Connect with us

Politics

Missouri House speaker’s attorneys criticize ethics probe

Published

on




Private attorneys hired by the top Republican in the Missouri House demanded on Tuesday that the ethics investigation into their client be formally dismissed.House Speaker Dean Plocher has still not publicly commented on the allegations of ethical misconduct that have hung over his final year in the legislature, or the later accusations that he pressured witnesses and obstructed the House Ethics Committee investigation.On Tuesday, he dispatched his attorneys — Lowell Pearson and David Steelman — to discredit the inquiry and criticize the Republican lawmaker appointed by Plocher to lead the ethics committee, state Rep. Hannah Kelly of Mountain View.In a letter to Kelly, and later at a hastily called press conference in the Capitol basement, Plocher’s defenders argued the investigation should have never occurred in the first place. The letter included affidavits from some of the key players in the scandals that have swirled around Plocher arguing in his defense.“This investigation was mishandled from the start,” Pearson and Steelman’s letter read.Since late last year, Plocher has faced an investigation, as well as calls for his resignation, over his unsuccessful push for the House to sign an $800,000 contract with a private software company outside the normal bidding process; alleged threats of retaliation against nonpartisan legislative staff who raised red flags about that contract; purportedly firing a potential whistleblower; and filing years of false expense reports for travelalready paid for by his campaign.Last week, the ethics committee voted 6-2 to reject a report recommending a formal letter of disapproval for Plocher, that he hire an accounting professional to manage his expense reports moving forward and that he refrain from retaliation against any legislator or House employee who cooperated with the committee.After the report was defeated, it became a public document.Kelly has subsequently said the investigation was severely hindered because of Plocher’s efforts to undermine the committee’s work. Specifically, Plocher refused to speak to an attorney hired by the committee to gather evidence and would not sign subpoenas to compel witnesses to testify.In addition to the delays, Kelly also accused Plocher of making efforts to “threaten witnesses, block our investigation and prevent this process from reaching its natural conclusion.”On Tuesday, Steelman pushed back on that narrative, claiming the hiring of the attorney was “unlawful” and that it was the committee — not the speaker — who chose to drag out the process.“It was a drummed-up exercise trying to get rid of a speaker,” Steelman said of the investigation.Steelman, an ex-state lawmaker and former member of the University of Missouri Board of Curators, told reporters the reason Plocher refused to sign subpoenas was because they were designed to compel both him and his chief of staff, Rod Jetton, to testify.Both were willing to testify without a subpoena, Steelman said.That wasn’t the reason cited in rejecting the supboenas in the three letters from the speaker’s office to the committee in March and April. And in one of those letters, Plocher’s general counsel noted the committee initially sought five subpoenas.Asked Tuesday why Plocher didn’t recuse himself from the start, or at least when subpoena requests started showing up to his office, Steelman said the speaker recused himself “when it mattered.”Steelman accused the ethics committee of failing to follow its own rules, including in how it hired an outside attorney. He suggested that it’s possible the speaker’s office could refuse to pay the attorney for her work if she was hired unlawfully.A spokesman for the speaker’s office did not respond to a request for comment on whether the roughly $14,700 in legal fees will be paid.Ultimately, Steelman said the ethics committee must reconvene and finish its work — which he believes means dismissing the complaint and declaring Plocher exonerated.No ethics committee hearings have been held since the report was released to the public.Kelly has not commented publicly, beyond a post on social media declaring that “because of the efforts by the speaker to threaten witnesses, block our investigation and prevent this process from reaching its natural conclusion, there is nothing more that can be done.”“The report speaks for itself,” Kelly wrote last week, “as do the votes of the committee members.”Plocher is running for the GOP nomination for Missouri secretary of state. He currently leads his seven Republican opponents by a wide margin in fundraising, with more than $1.3 million cash on hand between his campaign account and allied political action committee.But nearly all of that was raised before the litany of scandals became public last fall that have dominated his last year as speaker of the Missouri House.After taking in nearly $400,000 for his campaign and PAC in 2023, he raised just $15,000 this year.This story originally was published in The Missouri Independent, part of the States Newsroom.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Petition to legalize abortion in Missouri turns in signatures

Published

on




A petition seeking to place abortion rights in the Missouri Constitution collected more than double the number of signatures needed to place the issue on the ballot.Missourians for Constitutional Freedom said the group turned in more than 380,000 signatures to the secretary of state’s office on Friday. The number needed to place a proposed constitutional amendment on the ballot is roughly 171,000.Speaking to a group of supporters at the Capitol on Friday morning, Kennedy Moore with Abortion Action Missouri said signatures were gathered in all of Missouri’s 114 counties.“That shows that Missourians in every corner of the Show-Me State don’t want to be subjected to abortion bans,” Moore said. “They don’t want to live in a state that restricts access to and puts medical decisions in the hands of politicians.”For a proposed amendment to make it onto the ballot, signatures must be collected by 8% of legal voters in six of Missouri’s eight congressional districts. The group said it achieved that threshold in six districts.Now, the signatures go to the secretary of state’s office to be verified.Tori Schafer with the ACLU of Missouri said there should not be any hiccups over the signatures in the coming weeks because “we clearly followed the law.”“We are of course preparing for anything, and we’re confident that any attacks that we experienced are politically motivated and we’ll win again in court,” Schafer said.

Sarah Kellogg

/

St. Louis Public Radio Tori Schafer, with the ACLU of Missouri, speaks to supporters of an initiative petition that seeks to enshrine abortion rights in the state constitution on Friday.

The proposed petitions faced multiple lawsuits that ultimately shortened the length of time the organization had to collect signatures.One of the suits was over the amendment’s fiscal note, where the auditor and secretary of state’s office disagreed over who had the authority to finalize the note.Attorney General Andrew Bailey’s office refused to approve the note created by Auditor Scott Fitzpatrick issued on the petition. Bailey’s office wanted Fitzpatrick to redo it to say the abortion ban would cost Missouri billions of dollars.Both a Cole County circuit judge and the Missouri Supreme Court ruled against Bailey.The other lawsuit was over the wording of the ballot language initially issued by Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft.The Missouri Western Court of Appeals ruled that Ashcroft’s summaries contained politically partisan language. The court also upheld, with few changes, a revised summary written by Cole County Circuit Judge Jon Beetem.“In March of 2023, we filed this amendment to end our state’s abortion ban, and immediately we were met with political attacks. State officials used the legal system to delay us from collecting signatures,” Schafer said.Unless Ashcroft expedites the signature counting process, Missourians will likely vote on the issue in November if the issue is placed on the ballot.

Sarah Kellogg

/

St. Louis Public Radio A “Decline to Sign” sign hangs on the office door of Sen. Nick Schroer, R-Defiance. Schroer participated this week in a filibuster of over 40 hours in an effort to bring forward a resolution that if passed by voters, would make it harder to amend Missouri’s constitution. The filibuster ended without that resolution being taken up.

The prospect of abortion rights being on the ballot spurred anti-abortion activists to try to stop people from signing the petition.“In our Decline to Sign Campaign, Missouri Right to Life has educated and activated countless Missourians to fight the battle to ‘Keep Missouri Pro-Life!'” Missouri Right to Life said in a statement.It has also renewed calls for the passage of a proposed constitutional amendment that would make it harder to change Missouri’s constitution.This week, a faction of state senators filibustered for more than 40 hours in an attempt to bring forward and pass a resolution that would require any proposed constitutional amendment to win both a simple majority of voters and a majority in each of Missouri’s eight congressional districts to take effect.“Here we are today, in the midst of one of the longest filibusters that this chamber has seen this year in order to bring to fruition our efforts to protect the constitution of this state from the abortionists who are trying to enshrine the institution of death into the constitution,” Sen. Bill Eigel, R-Weldon Spring, said.Ultimately, the filibuster ended before that resolution passed. There are two weeks left in the 2024 legislative session.The deadline to turn in signatures for proposed constitutional amendments or state law changes is May 5.Other groups that have turned in their signatures include one advocating for a state law change to raise the minimum wage and another that seeks to legalize sports betting.



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Congressman Alford says the U.S. must continue to support Taiwan

Published

on




It’s been over a week since Congress put the finishing touches on a foreign aid package to help Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan.And while much of the attention and focus is around opposition to providing military assistance to Ukraine and Israel, there’s been less debate about helping Taiwan blunt any potential invasion from China.U.S. Rep. Mark Alford, R-Cass County, recently traveled to Taiwan as part of a bipartisan delegation. In an interview earlier this week on the Politically Speaking Hour on St. Louis on the Air, Alford stressed that both Congress and the executive branch need to remain focused on stemming China’s growing influence.“I know we don’t officially recognize them as a nation, but they are very independent-minded people, a beautiful island that needs our help,” Alford said. “They need our help in deterring the Communist Chinese from further aggression.”China has long maintained that Taiwan is part of its territory, even though Taiwan is a representative democratic republic compared to China’s one-party communist state.When asked if the $8 billion in aid to Taiwan could provide an inference that the United States considers the island to be an independent country, Alford replied, “I think that’s always a possibility.”Recent polling shows that the vast majority of Taiwanese respondents prefer the status quo, as opposed to reunification with China or a declaration of independence.“We do have key provisions of the Taiwan Relations Act, which include making available to Taiwan the defense articles and services that they need to maintain a sufficient self defense capability,” Alford said. “That’s what we’ve agreed to, and we need to live up to that capability, no matter what lies down the road. It’s the same as President Reagan said, peace through strength.”China is nearly 60 times larger in terms of population than Taiwan — which Alford acknowledged would make any Chinese potential invasion daunting to combat.He added that it makes sense to aid the Taiwanese when China is trying to expand its reach around the globe.“They are building investments through the Belt and Road Initiative in our hemisphere. They are intent on having an influence,” Alford said. “They’re building ports, airports, seaports, roadways, and bridges to where they can exert pressure on these nations, and supplant us as a leading economic and world power.”Alford voted for Israel aid but against Ukraine assistanceMembers of the House had the opportunity to vote on whether to aid Ukraine, Taiwan and Israel separately. Alford backed military assistance for Israel but voted against aiding Ukraine.Some Republicans, including former President Donald Trump, suggested that aid to Ukraine should come in the form of a loan. But there’s been no such push to make aid to Israel or Taiwan a loan even though the governments in both countries could hypothetically pay for military equipment themselves.

Rep. Alford joins the Politically Speaking Hour on St. Louis on the Air

Alford said aiding Taiwan makes sense, but a war with China could have a devastating impact on the world economy. He also said it was important to aid Israel because “they are a leader, a beacon of hope and freedom and democracy in the Mideast.”“I believe that they are God’s chosen people, that this is their land, they are willing to live in harmony if those other people who are in that land are willing to live alongside them as well,” Alford said. “But that has been the issue. They do not want Israel to be there. They do not want the State of Israel to exist.”Alford has been against Ukrainian aid because he said U.S. military personnel can’t provide a clear case about what “victory looks like.”“Taxpayers should not be continuing to fund this mission until we know what victory is defined as,” he said.“St. Louis on the Air” brings you the stories of St. Louis and the people who live, work and create in our region. The show is produced by Ulaa Kuziez, Miya Norfleet, Emily Woodbury, Danny Wicentowski, Elaine Cha and Alex Heuer. The audio engineer is Aaron Doerr, and the production intern is Roshae Hemmings. Send questions and comments about this story to talk@stlpr.org.Send questions and comments about this story to feedback@stlpublicradio.org.



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Bailey’s Missouri trans tip line flooded with pro-trans support

Published

on




A tip line created by Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey to collect complaints about gender-affirming care received thousands of responses before it was shut down in April 2023.At the time, Bailey’s office provided little explanation beyond suggesting that the service had been hacked by “far left activists…trying to impede parents’ ability to shed light on what happened to their children.”But records obtained by St. Louis Public Radio through a Sunshine Request show a different story playing out in the short-lived tip line: Its first 48 hours of existence cover thousands of pages and more than 400 emails. Despite Bailey’s call for the public to provide accounts of abuse at the Washington University Transgender Center at St. Louis Children’s Hospital, the majority of the tip line’s first replies defended gender-affirming care, praised the clinic and instead used the provided form to submit complaints about Bailey and the tip line itself.Becky Hormuth, a teacher and mother of a 17-year-old trans child, made one of the first replies that came into the tip line on March 23, 2023. In her message, she wrote that Bailey was “trying to bully and dismiss the rights my husband and I have as parents.”Looking back on her response a year ago, Hormuth said she was fearful that the tip line would become a tool used by Republican lawmakers in their efforts to end trans care in Missouri. She saw it as a potential danger.“I was afraid of it, not just for our family and my child in general, but for all transgender individuals in Missouri,” she told St. Louis on the Air. “I felt like it was a hunt to find evidence of something that was unfounded….It’s harming my family.”The tip line lasted only a month, ending on April 21, 2023 — but Bailey’s efforts were followed weeks later by a trans care ban passed by Missouri’s Republican-majority legislature. Although that law seemingly included an exception for trans minors already receiving care, in August, Washington University announced it would no longer provide gender-affirming care to patients under 18, citing “unsustainable liability for health-care professionals” triggered by the new law.One of those patients turned away from the clinic was Hormuth’s son, Levi. He now travels to Illinois to receive gender-affirming care like testosterone.When he and his mother found out about the clinic closing its doors to trans kids, “we kind of broke down,” Levi recalled. “My mom, she immediately started calling into places outside of the state, because nobody in state would take anybody more or take new patients. So we had to resort to Illinois. And that took more extra time to get into that clinic. It was emotional and scary and horrible to go through. But we were able to adapt.”Bailey’s investigation of the clinic is ongoing. His office did not respond to questions from St. Louis on the Air about the total number of respondents to the tip line or what role the complaints have in the investigation.Although they do not contain evidence of hacking, the records of the tip line’s first 48 hours appear to confirm reports of activists trying to jam the service with trolling, jokes and insults directed at Bailey. One March 23 email began with the script of the 2007 animated film “Bee Movie” and continued for more than 2,800 pages.To hear more about Andrew Bailey’s trans tip line and how it affected trans people and families, listen to St. Louis on the Air on Apple Podcast or Spotify or by clicking the play button below.

Records reveal responses to Andrew Bailey’s trans tip line

“St. Louis on the Air” brings you the stories of St. Louis and the people who live, work and create in our region. The show is produced by Miya Norfleet, Emily Woodbury, Danny Wicentowski, Elaine Cha and Alex Heuer. Roshae Hemmings is our production assistant. The audio engineer is Aaron Doerr. Send questions and comments about this story to talk@stlpr.org.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending