Connect with us

Politics

Why Rep. Cori Bush’s Israel criticism drew a primary challenger

Published

on

[ad_1]


U.S. Rep. Cori Bush has broken the political mold in Missouri on a number of fronts.She’s the first Black woman to represent Missouri in Congress. She is the most high-profile person to come out of the Ferguson protest movement to be elected to office. And there’s another way that the St. Louis County Democrat has stood out from most of her counterparts: She’s been one of the few people in Missouri politics who has sharply criticized Israel’s monthlong bombing campaign in Gaza that has killed thousands of civilians.“I fight for all of humanity, be it Israeli or Palestinian or Black, white, in whichever country — I fight for every single person,” Bush said in an interview this week. “I have been the same person this whole time. My stance on Israel and Palestine and my stance on not wanting to support and fund human rights abuses from any country’s government has been the same for years.”Bush’s views on the longstanding Israeli-Palestinian conflict have come under intense scrutiny in the month since Hamas killed more than 1,400 Israelis and took about 240 hostages. She’s been one of the leading American political voices calling for a cease-fire — something she says is popular with the public, even though it’s not gaining significant momentum in Congress.She’s also drawn fierce criticism for some of her public statements, including calling for an end to “Israeli military occupation and apartheid.” And she’s decried Israel Defense Forces air and ground attacks, which Gaza officials say have killed more than 10,000 people. In a post on X, Bush wrote that she won’t be silent about what she labels “Israel’s ethnic cleansing campaign.”

Tristen Rouse

/

St. Louis Public RadioAttorney Marc Jacob, photographed Tuesday, has come out against U.S. Rep. Cori Bush, D-St. Louis County, in the aftermath of her publicly opposing Israel’s military campaign in Gaza.

Those comments spurred a letter from some St. Louis Jewish groups and leaders condemning the remarks. And Bush’s criticism of Israel is a reason why she’s facing a Democratic primary challenge from St. Louis County Prosecutor Wesley Bell — whom many of Bush’s supporters helped get elected to his post in 2018.“What I would say to those who have traditionally supported Cori Bush is that I believe you probably supported her because you believed that she held moral positions,” said Marc Jacob, a University City attorney who has family in Israel. “And I think what we’ve seen in the last month is that that’s starting to fall apart.”But Bush is also receiving support from across the 1st Congressional District, which includes St. Louis and some suburbs. Voters like St. Louis resident Jo Ely see Bush’s advocacy for the Palestinians when so many of her counterparts are backing Israeli military action as a courageous move that will stand the test of time.“When it comes to foreign policy issues, we don’t really pay attention until it’s glaring at us on our social media feeds or is in the news. But in my line of work, I often see the outcome of those policies,” said Ely, a social worker who assists refugees and immigrants. “Violence just creates more violence and trauma. And the physical and mental impact of that stay with so many people. And I appreciate that Cori is at least speaking out. And I wish more politicians would.”

Tristen Rouse

/

St. Louis Public RadioU.S. Rep. Cori Bush, D-St. Louis County, center, attends a memorial commemorating the ninth anniversary of Michael Brown Jr.’s killing by a police officer on Aug. 9 outside Canfield Apartments in Ferguson.

Forged in FergusonIn many respects, Bush’s activism for Palestinians came from her time in Ferguson. During an October press conference to promote a House resolution calling on the Biden administration to push for a cease-fire, Bush stated her “beliefs are rooted in my experiences as an activist in the movement to save Black lives.”Cassandra Butler, a political scientist who lives in Ferguson, recalls seeing Palestinians on social media platforms showing support for protesters who were outraged when a police officer shot and killed Michael Brown.“That commonality of truth telling or oppressed people wanting to be heard and seen, and their truth told, is common across the world,” Butler said. “African Americans are oppressed people. And Palestinians are oppressed people. We found that we had kinship there.”

Brian Munoz

/

St. Louis Public RadioLamya Abukanan, 23, of Ballwin, participates in a pro-Palestinian rally on Oct. 15 at Kiener Plaza in downtown St. Louis.

Omar Badran, an entrepreneur who lives in downtown St. Louis, said that many Palestinian Americans like himself participated in the protest movement after Brown’s death. Having a prominent political figure like Bush speak out for Palestinians is meaningful, he said, especially when other Missouri political leaders have defended Israel.“I think there is really a disconnect when it comes to the Congress and the wants and needs of the American people,” Badran said. “I feel like she’s always championing causes near and dear to her heart, whether it be popular or unpopular. And they always seem to fall on the right side of what’s best for the people, what’s best for the downtrodden, what’s best for the underserved communities.”Since the Oct. 7 attacks, Bush emerged as a leading advocate for a cease-fire in Gaza. Many of Bush’s congressional colleagues have rejected the idea, with Democratic Sen. Bernie Sanders saying on Sunday he’s not sure a cease-fire is possible “with an organization like Hamas, which is dedicated to turmoil and chaos and destroying the state of Israel.”Bush said calls for a cease-fire are popular, gaining support from prominent organizations like Amnesty International — and world leaders, including Pope Francis. Bush added that she’s calling for a cease-fire “to save lives.”“So our position is: Go as hard as you can to save as many lives as you can and to get our hostages home because the indiscriminate bombings even hurt our hostages,” Bush said.

Brian Munoz

/

St. Louis Public RadioNearly 200 people gather in support of Israel on Oct. 15 during a rally at the Jewish Federation of St. Louis in Creve Coeur.

Bush statements spark intense criticismBush argues that Israeli military actions in Gaza and the resulting displacement of Palestinian civilians in her view meet a United Nations definition of ethnic cleansing.“Part of my job is to actually speak to what is happening so we can actually get to the root so that we can actually fix the problem,” Bush said. “I am not going to sugarcoat anything, because the people of St. Louis did not send me to Congress to pacify people and to make people feel comfortable. They sent me to D.C. to make sure that I’m speaking for those who are marginalized and oppressed.”Her comments prompted some St. Louis-area Jewish leaders and organizations to write a letter calling Bush’s words “insensitive, incorrect, and fanning the flames of antisemitism.”Bush said “repeatedly that she supports the Jewish community, is listening to our fears and concerns, and stands against antisemitism. She then issues public statements that directly contradict what she told us in private,” the letter stated.“Talking about ethnic cleansing is literally like cutting to this most sensitive nerve for a lot of folks in the Jewish community,” said Amy Kuo Hammerman, the state policy advocate for Missouri for the National Council of Jewish Women. “And that’s hurtful and unnecessary. Like, even if you agree 100% with what she believes in regards to policy — and there are a lot of Jews who do — for someone who is constantly known for her refrain of, ‘Remember, your congresswoman loves you?’ We really didn’t feel the love.”

Brian Munoz

/

St. Louis Public RadioYael Shomroni, 63, on Wednesday outside her St. Louis County home. Shomroni approves of Bush’s advocacy in the Israel-Hamas war.

Bush noted in her interview this week that a letter came out on Tuesday from groups, including the Progressive Jews of St. Louis and Jewish Voice for Peace-St Louis, that are supportive of her push for a cease-fire. She added: “I should be able to love both communities, I should be able to love both and fight for both and push for security for both. And so, I will continue to do that.”“We’ve heard from Jewish constituents all across the district who do support the positions I’ve taken. I appreciate the diversity within the St. Louis Jewish community, and I’ll just continue to be engaged and I’ll continue to represent every single one of my constituents,” she said.St. Louis resident Isaac Pollack said he’s often found common ground with Bush on issues, including her support for public education and her fight against racial injustice. But the school administrator said some of her statements made him ask, “Where is my ally when I’ve tried to be a participant in the struggle in our city?”“It’s problematic, because the reason Israel exists is because, as Jews, we have a long memory,” said Pollack. “And we remember that every country that we’ve ever been welcomed into has eventually put us out. And that’s why Israel exists, because after the Holocaust, there needed to be a place where Jews could trust anywhere in the world that we could go to.”Yael Shomroni, a St. Louis County potter who is originally from Israel, said she supports Bush’s advocacy for Palestinians. And she rejected the idea that criticism of the Israeli government’s military actions is somehow out of bounds.“Cori, of course, condemned Hamas. Her biggest crime is calling for a cease-fire,” Shomroni said. “Bombing civilians isn’t going to bring the hostages back.”

Tristen Rouse

/

St. Louis Public RadioWesley Bell, St. Louis County prosecuting attorney, holds a fundraising event on Sept. 18 at a campaign volunteer’s home in Glendale.

Bell’s challengeBush easily fended off a primary challenger last year and cruised to reelection in the heavily Democratic district. Some of her supporters were stunned when Bell, the St. Louis County prosecutor, announced that he was abandoning his U.S. Senate bid and instead running in the 1st Congressional District.In an interview, Bell said that “in order to move this region forward, it absolutely requires us to work together.”“And so I think that our district deserves steady and more and more impactful leadership,” Bell said. “This is nothing personal against our congressperson. But I think that I’ve made a career of bringing people together, being transparent, and showing up.”
Bell said while there was more to his decision to run against Bush than her criticism of Israel, it did play a role.“Those statements were offensive to a lot of folks, a lot of her constituents,” Bell said. “What I hoped is that when the congressperson got into office, that there would be more growth into the role of governing. And I think those comments show a lack of understanding of the nuances and complexities of an issue that is literally hundreds of years in the making.”Bell said he hasn’t received any commitments that political groups supportive of Israel, such as the American Israel Public Affairs Committee or Democratic Majority for Israel, will back his campaign. He did release a list of endorsements that included a slew of local Jewish leaders, including some who supported Bush in the past.Bush said she was disappointed that Bell chose to challenge her. She said that when he was running for Senate, he asked for her endorsement — and questioned why he would do that if he was so upset over her long-standing criticism of Israel. Bell’s campaign said that he talked with Bush soon after he announced he was running for the Senate.First District residents, such as Sara Borusiewich of St. Louis, who works in sales, was pleased to see Bell drop out of the Senate race to run against Bush. Borusiewich said Bush’s statements about Israel contributed to her disillusionment with the two-term congresswoman — adding that she’s become way too divisive in turbulent times.“And that’s my biggest problem with her,” Borusiewich said. “We need a more unifying voice in the city of St. Louis.”Others saw Bell’s decision to run against Bush as laying the groundwork for an ugly and divisive campaign at a time when emotions are already high over the war.“It makes me angry that someone like Prosecutor Wesley Bell would decide to jump into this race … knowing that [Bush is] a champion on human rights,” said Neveen Ayesh of the Missouri chapter for American Muslims for Palestine. “Not just for Palestinians, but any humans.”Bush supporter Montague Simmons doesn’t see Bell’s challenge in a vacuum.The longtime St. Louis organizer noted that it’s coming at the same time that some Democratic organizations are going after members of Congress who are critical of Israel, like Rep. Rashida Tlaib of Michigan and Rep. Ilhan Omar of Minnesota.Simmons said that people like Bush are at the cutting edge of popular opinion and that Democrats who are opposing her are out of step with what people want.“And even though some of the people that are targeting them think of themselves as mainstream, they’re very much to the right of where a lot of folks are living,” Simmons said.

Michael B. Thomas

/

Special to St. Louis Public RadioU.S. Rep. Cori Bush, D-St. Louis County, celebrates victory during her Election Night watch party in August 2022 at House of Soul in downtown St. Louis.

Will Israel be decisive?Whether Bell can beat Bush next August could depend on whether her statements about Israel erode support from the racially diverse coalition that elected her to office. Other candidates — including state Sen. Brian Williams — may get into the race, which could split the anti-Bush vote. And if Bush opponents can’t persuade Black and white progressive voters to abandon her, they may have a tough path to victory in the August primary.Still, Olivette resident Mike Minoff, who works for a health insurance company, said it’s possible that Republican Jewish voters in the 1st District could turn out in large numbers to vote against Bush in the Democratic primary.“Hopefully the Jewish voters in our district who typically vote Republican are going to say: ‘This is such an important cause. I’d rather vote in this one for the candidate running against Cori Bush and miss out on my opportunity to vote for the Republican challenger for secretary of state or for governor or lieutenant governor, or whatever,’” Minoff said. “I need to make sure that my voice is heard on my House of Representatives vote.”Some voters who aren’t planning to vote for Bush, such as Overland resident Corbin Palakran, a truck driver, aren’t sure that Israel will be a determining factor in her reelection prospects. He said the only time he’s heard people in Overland talk about the Israeli-Hamas war is “because I started talking about it.”

[ad_2]

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Poll: Support for Missouri abortion rights amendment growing

Published

on

[ad_1]


A proposed constitutional amendment legalizing abortion in Missouri received support from more than half of respondents in a new poll from St. Louis University and YouGov.That’s a boost from a poll earlier this year, which could mean what’s known as Amendment 3 is in a solid position to pass in November.SLU/YouGov’s poll of 900 likely Missouri voters from Aug. 8-16 found that 52% of respondents would vote for Amendment 3, which would place constitutional protections for abortion up to fetal viability. Thirty-four percent would vote against the measure, while 14% aren’t sure.By comparison, the SLU/YouGov poll from February found that 44% of voters would back the abortion legalization amendment.St. Louis University political science professor Steven Rogers said 32% of Republicans and 53% of independents would vote for the amendment. That’s in addition to nearly 80% of Democratic respondents who would approve the measure. In the previous poll, 24% of Republicans supported the amendment.Rogers noted that neither Amendment 3 nor a separate ballot item raising the state’s minimum wage is helping Democratic candidates. GOP contenders for U.S. Senate, governor, lieutenant governor, treasurer and secretary of state all hold comfortable leads.“We are seeing this kind of crossover voting, a little bit, where there are voters who are basically saying, ‘I am going to the polls and I’m going to support a Republican candidate, but I’m also going to go to the polls and then I’m also going to try to expand abortion access and then raise the minimum wage,’” Rogers said.Republican gubernatorial nominee Mike Kehoe has a 51%-41% lead over Democrat Crystal Quade. And U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley is leading Democrat Lucas Kunce by 53% to 42%. Some GOP candidates for attorney general, secretary of state and treasurer have even larger leads over their Democratic rivals.

Brian Munoz

/

St. Louis Public RadioHundreds of demonstrators pack into a parking lot at Planned Parenthood of St. Louis and Southwest Missouri on June 24, 2022, during a demonstration following the Supreme Court’s reversal of a case that guaranteed the constitutional right to an abortion.

One of the biggest challenges for foes of Amendment 3 could be financial.Typically, Missouri ballot initiatives with well-funded and well-organized campaigns have a better chance of passing — especially if the opposition is underfunded and disorganized. Since the end of July, the campaign committee formed to pass Amendment 3 received more than $3 million in donations of $5,000 or more.That money could be used for television advertisements to improve the proposal’s standing further, Rogers said, as well as point out that Missouri’s current abortion ban doesn’t allow the procedure in the case of rape or incest.“Meanwhile, the anti side won’t have those resources to kind of try to make that counter argument as strongly, and they don’t have public opinion as strongly on their side,” Rogers said.There is precedent of a well-funded initiative almost failing due to opposition from socially conservative voters.In 2006, a measure providing constitutional protections for embryonic stem cell research nearly failed — even though a campaign committee aimed at passing it had a commanding financial advantage.Former state Sen. Bob Onder was part of the opposition campaign to that measure. He said earlier this month it is possible to create a similar dynamic in 2024 against Amendment 3, if social conservatives who oppose abortion rights can band together.“This is not about reproductive rights or care for miscarriages or IVF or anything else,” said Onder, the GOP nominee for Missouri’s 3rd Congressional District seat. “Missourians will learn that out-of-state special interests and dark money from out of state is lying to them and they will reject this amendment.”Quade said earlier this month that Missourians of all political ideologies are ready to roll back the state’s abortion ban.“Regardless of political party, we hear from folks who are tired of politicians being in their doctor’s offices,” Quade said. “They want politicians to mind their own business. So this is going to excite folks all across the political spectrum.”

[ad_2]

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Democrat Mark Osmack makes his case for Missouri treasurer

Published

on

[ad_1]


Mark Osmack has been out of the electoral fray for awhile, but he never completely abandoned his passion for Missouri politics.Osmack, a Valley Park native and U.S. Army veteran, previously ran for Missouri’s 2nd Congressional District seat and for state Senate. Now he’s the Democratic nominee for state treasurer after receiving a phone call from Missouri Democratic Party Chairman Russ Carnahan asking him to run.“There’s a lot of decision making and processing and evaluation that goes into it, which is something I am very passionate and interested in,” Osmack said this week on an episode of Politically Speaking.Osmack is squaring off against state Treasurer Vivek Malek, who was able to easily win a crowded GOP primary against several veteran lawmakers including House Budget Chairman Cody Smith and state Sen. Andrew Koenig.While Malek was able to attract big donations to his political action committee and pour his own money into the campaign, Osmack isn’t worried that he won’t be able to compete in November. Since Malek was appointed to his post, Osmack contends he hasn’t proven that he’s a formidable opponent in a general election.“His actions and his decision making so far in his roughly two year tenure in that office have been questionable,” Osmack said.Among other things, Osmack was critical of Malek for placing unclaimed property notices on video gaming machines which are usually found in gas stations or convenience stores. The legality of the machines has been questioned for some time.As Malek explained on his own episode of Politically Speaking, he wanted to make sure the unclaimed property program was as widely advertised as possible. But he acknowledged it was a mistake to put the decals close to the machines and ultimately decided to remove them.Osmack said: “This doesn’t even pass the common sense sniff test of, ‘Hey, should I put state stickers claiming you might have a billion dollars on a gambling machine that is not registered with the state of Missouri?’ If we’re gonna give kudos for him acknowledging the wrong thing, it never should have been done in the first place.”Osmack’s platform includes supporting programs providing school meals using Missouri agriculture products and making child care more accessible for the working class.He said the fact that Missouri has such a large surplus shows that it’s possible to create programs to make child care within reach for parents.“It is quite audacious for [Republicans] to brag about $8 billion, with a B, dollars in state surplus, while we offer next to no social services to include pre-K, daycare, or child care,” Osmack said.Here’s are some other topics Osmack discussed on the show:How he would handle managing the state’s pension systems and approving low-income housing tax credits. The state treasurer’s office is on boards overseeing both of those programs.Malek’s decision to cut off investments from Chinese companies. Osmack said that Missouri needs to be cautious about abandoning China as a business partner, especially since they’re a major consumer of the state’s agriculture products. “There’s a way to make this work where we are not supporting communist nations to the detriment of the United States or our allies, while also maintaining strong economic ties that benefit Missouri farmers,” he said.What it was like to witness the skirmish at the Missouri State Fair between U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley and Democratic challenger Lucas Kunce.Whether Kunce can get the support of influential groups like the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, which often channels money and staff to states with competitive Senate elections.

[ad_2]

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

As Illinois receives praise for its cannabis equity efforts, stakeholders work on system’s flaws

Published

on

[ad_1]


Medical marijuana patients can now purchase cannabis grown by small businesses as part of their allotment, Illinois’ top cannabis regulator said, but smaller, newly licensed cannabis growers are still seeking greater access to the state’s medical marijuana customers.Illinois legalized medicinal marijuana beginning in 2014, then legalized it for recreational use in 2020. While the 2020 law legalized cannabis use for any adult age 21 or older, it did not expand licensing for medical dispensaries.Patients can purchase marijuana as part of the medical cannabis program at dual-purpose dispensaries, which are licensed to serve both medical and recreational customers. But dual-purpose dispensaries are greatly outnumbered by dispensaries only licensed to sell recreationally, and there are no medical-only dispensaries in the state.As another part of the adult-use legalization law, lawmakers created a “craft grow” license category that was designed to give more opportunities to Illinoisans hoping to legally grow and sell marijuana. The smaller-scale grow operations were part of the 2020 law’s efforts to diversify the cannabis industry in Illinois.Prior to that, all cultivation centers in Illinois were large-scale operations dominated by large multi-state operators. The existing cultivators, mostly in operation since 2014, were allowed to grow recreational cannabis beginning in 2019.Until recently, dual-purpose dispensaries have been unsure as to whether craft-grown products, made by social equity licensees — those who have lived in a disproportionately impacted area or have been historically impacted by the war on drugs — can be sold medicinally as part of a patient’s medical allotment.Erin Johnson, the state’s cannabis regulation oversight officer, told Capitol News Illinois last month that her office has “been telling dispensaries, as they have been asking us” they can now sell craft-grown products to medical patients.“There was just a track and trace issue on our end, but never anything statutorily,” she said.

Dilpreet Raju

/

Capitol News IllinoisThe graphic shows how cannabis grown in Illinois gets from cultivation centers to customers.

No notice has been posted, but Johnson’s verbal guidance comes almost two years after the first craft grow business went online in Illinois.It allows roughly 150,000 medical patients, who dispensary owners say are the most consistent purchasers of marijuana, to buy products made by social equity businesses without paying recreational taxes. However — even as more dispensaries open — the number available to medical patients has not increased since 2018, something the Cannabis Regulation Oversight Office “desperately” wants to see changed. Johnson said Illinois is a limited license state, meaning “there are caps on everything” to help control the relatively new market.Berwyn Thompkins, who operates two cannabis businesses, said the rules limited options for patients and small businesses.“It’s about access,” Thompkins said. “Why wouldn’t we want all the patients — which the (adult-use) program was initially built around — why wouldn’t we want them to have access? They should have access to any dispensary.”Customers with a medical marijuana card pay a 1% tax on all marijuana products, whereas recreational customers pay retail taxes between roughly 20 and 40% on a given cannabis product, when accounting for local taxes.While Illinois has received praise for its equity-focused cannabis law, including through an independent study that showed more people of color own cannabis licenses than in any other state, some industry operators say they’ve experienced many unnecessary hurdles getting their businesses up and running.The state, in fact, announced last month that it had opened its 100th social equity dispensary.But Steve Olson, purchasing manager at a pair of dispensaries (including one dual-purpose dispensary) near Rockford, said small specialty license holders have been left in the lurch since the first craft grower opened in October 2022.“You would think that this would be something they’re (the government) trying to help out these social equity companies with, but they’re putting handcuffs on them in so many different spots,” he said. “One of them being this medical thing.”Olson said he contacted state agencies, including the Department of Financial and Professional Regulation, months ago about whether craft products can be sold to medical patients at their retail tax rate, but only heard one response: “They all say it was an oversight.”This potentially hurt social equity companies because they sell wholesale to dispensaries and may have been missing out on a consistent customer base through those medical dispensaries.Olson said the state’s attempts to provide licensees with a path to a successful business over the years, such as with corrective lotteries that granted more social equity licenses, have come up short.“It’s like they almost set up the social equity thing to fail so the big guys could come in and swoop up all these licenses,” Olson said. “I hate to feel like that but, if you look at it, it’s pretty black and white.”Olson said craft companies benefit from any type of retail sale.“If we sell it to medical patients or not, it’s a matter of, ‘Are we collecting the proper taxes?’ That’s all it is,” he said.State revenue from cannabis taxes, licensing costs and other fees goes into the Cannabis Regulation Fund, which is used to fund a host of programs, including cannabis offense expungement, the general revenue fund, and the R3 campaign aiming to uplift disinvested communities.For fiscal year 2024, nearly $256 million was paid out from Cannabis Regulation Fund for related initiatives, which includes almost $89 million transferred to the state’s general revenue fund and more than $20 million distributed to local governments, according to the Illinois Department of Revenue.Medical access still limitedThe state’s 55 medical dispensaries that predate the 2020 legalization law, mostly owned by publicly traded multistate operators that had been operating in Illinois since 2014 under the state’s medical marijuana program, were automatically granted a right to licenses to sell recreationally in January 2020. That gave them a dual-purpose license that no new entrants into the market can receive under current law.Since expanding their clientele in 2020, Illinois dispensaries have sold more than $6 billion worth of cannabis products through recreational transactions alone.Nearly two-thirds of dispensaries licensed to sell to medical patients are in the northeast counties of Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake and Will. Dual-purpose dispensaries only represent about 20 percent of the state’s dispensaries.While the state began offering recreational dispensary licenses since the adult-use legalization law passed, it has not granted a new medical dispensary license since 2018. That has allowed the established players to continue to corner the market on the state’s nearly 150,000 medical marijuana patients.But social equity licensees and advocates say there are more ways to level the playing field, including expanding access to medical sales.Johnson, who became the state’s top cannabis regulator in late 2022, expressed hope for movement during the fall veto session on House Bill 2911, which would expand medical access to all Illinois dispensaries.“We would like every single dispensary in Illinois to be able to serve medical patients,” Johnson said. “It’s something that medical patients have been asking for, for years.”Johnson said the bill would benefit patients and small businesses.“It’s something we desperately want to happen as a state system, because we want to make sure that medical patients are able to easily access what they need,” she said. “We also think it’s good for our social equity dispensaries, as they’re opening, to be able to serve medical patients.”Rep. Bob Morgan, D-Deerfield, who was the first statewide project coordinator for Illinois’ medical cannabis program prior to joining the legislature, wrote in an email to Capitol News Illinois that the state needs to be doing more for its patients.“Illinois is failing the state’s 150,000 medical cannabis patients with debilitating conditions. Too many are still denied the patient protections they deserve, including access to their medicine,” Morgan wrote, adding he would continue to work with stakeholders on further legislation.Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news service covering state government. It is distributed to hundreds of newspapers, radio and TV stations statewide. It is funded primarily by the Illinois Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation, along with major contributions from the Illinois Broadcasters Foundation and Southern Illinois Editorial Association.

[ad_2]

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending