Connect with us

Politics

What would Bost and Bailey do for Illinois’ 12th District?

Published

on

[ad_1]


The GOP congressional primary between U.S. Rep. Mike Bost and former gubernatorial nominee Darren Bailey represents a test of southern Illinois’ conservative makeup.On the campaign trail and in interviews, the two candidates focus much of their time discussing national issues. Both have directed lots of attention to the U.S.-Mexico border.“No. 1 priority is closing our border and making sure that we are secure with the millions of people who have come undocumented into our country,” Bailey said.
Bost said of the border: “That is the biggest issue right now — as it should be.”On local issues, the two have comparable but diverging paths to advancing the interests of constituents of Illinois and the 12th Congressional District, which stretches from Metro East towns like O’Fallon and Shiloh to the southernmost tip of the state near the Kentucky and Missouri borders.For example, the candidates agree that agriculture and military issues are some of the most pressing for southern Illinois.Scott Air Force Base is the biggest employer in the district. Because of Scott, the 12th is home to more than 52,000 veterans, according to data from the U.S. Census Bureau. That makes up 8.91% of the district’s population 18 and older — the most of any Illinois congressional district.Agriculture, the candidates said, is the second-largest industry in the district and key to their candidacies.

Eric Lee

/

St. Louis Public RadioU.S. Rep. Mike Bost, R-Murphysboro, speaks to supporters during a campaign event last month at Eckert’s Country Restaurant in Belleville.

What are Bost’s local issues?A fundamental campaign pitch for Bost to constituents is his chairmanship of the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs.The Marine veteran said he’d like to continue the committee’s oversight on issues like sexual harassment within the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Recently, House Republicans accused Veterans Affairs Secretary Denis McDonough of ignoring claims of sexual harassment and employee intimidation, the Military Times reported.The committee will also need to work out details of the PACT Act, Bost said. Congress passed the health care legislation in August 2022 that spends nearly $800 billion for veterans exposed to toxic substances in the military. Skyrocketing demand for benefits has left the Department of Veterans Affairs swamped.Also, while military housing is not an issue that is controlled by the Veterans’ Affairs Committee, Bost said he supports increasing the Basic Housing Allowance military members receive from the Department of Defense to buy or rent while in service.Previously, the allowance covered 100% of troops’ projected housing costs. However, that funding level dropped to 95% since 2015. Enlisted military members said an increase would go a long way in helping them afford adequate housing in the current real estate market.With military recruitment on the decline, paying military members more is a must, Bost said.“It still boils down to if the private sector is going to pay more money, you’re going to be down on recruitment,” Bost said.

Eric Lee

/

St. Louis Public RadioU.S. Rep. Mike Bost, R-Murphysboro, speaks to supporters during a campaign event last month in Belleville.

Eric Lee

/

St. Louis Public RadioStickers for U.S. Rep. Mike Bost, R-Murphysboro, on a table during a campaign event last month in Belleville.

The five-term congressman also serves on the House Agriculture Committee and House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee.Bost said Congress needs to pass a new Farm Bill. In November, the House and Senate extended the old one until September 2025. It was supposed to expire at the end of 2023.Bost said he’d like Congress to expand the program — dubbed Title One — that sends crop support payments to farmers during rough years.Some farmers have said reference prices, the amount that triggers payments under Title One, are far too low. Other agricultural economists have said it’s a waste and doesn’t make a big difference for farmers’ bottom lines.Bost would also like to move a migrant work program for the agricultural industry from under the oversight of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.The H-2A visa program allows migrant workers to travel to the U.S. for temporary work. Over the years, it’s become more popular in the U.S., as farmers and industrial agriculture struggle to find local employees.The move to the USDA would lighten the load for DHS, Bost said, and would better prepare the program to work on a timeframe for specific crops.“We’d have the law set up so it works with industry,” Bost said.And as part of the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, Bost said he’d like to use money from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Act, which he voted against, to widen and modernize various locks and levees of the Mississippi River north of Alton.The locks in his district are wide enough to allow barges to pass through without breaking the massive ships apart, he said. However, the locks farther north slow down supply chains and the movement of valuable freight because they’re smaller and older.“This would modernize them for faster transportation and greater payload to be moved the lock at any given time,” Bost said.

Eric Lee

/

St. Louis Public RadioDarren Bailey, right, former GOP gubernatorial nominee and state representative, speaks with a potential voter during a campaign event last month at Spike’s Public House in Millstadt.

What are Bailey’s local issues?Bailey said the economy and public safety are his top priorities.“The biggest driving factor for those right now is illegal immigration,” Bailey said.Recent polling has shown that immigration and the southern border has become an increasingly importantissue for many voters — especially Republicans.If elected, Bailey said he’d like to serve on the Agriculture Committee, Education and Workforce Committee and Energy and Commerce Committee.He served on roughly the same committees during his time in Springfield as a state representative from 2019 to 2021 and state senator from 2021 to 2023.The Clay County farmer said he’d be a natural fit on the Agriculture Committee. Asked about specific priorities for the Farm Bill or other agricultural initiatives, he said he’d like to start with education and advocacy. Specifically, he thinks more people should know that farmers don’t just work for federal subsidies.“A lot of people think that, for instance, farmers farm for government payments,” Bailey said. “That’s simply not true.”About 82% of the Farm Bill allocates money for nutrition programs — mainly for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, according to the Congressional Research Service. SNAP, formerly known as food stamps, provides government funding for lower-income households to buy food.In some GOP circles — which include key Bailey endorser Illinois U.S. Rep. Mary Miller — lawmakers want to make it harder for Americans to receive SNAP benefits. They argue that increasing the maximum age for work requirements could help raise Americans out of poverty.“Expecting able-bodied individuals to work isn’t just reasonable — it’s essential,” Bailey said. “While we need to extend a hand to those in need, we also owe it to our citizens to ensure that every dollar is spent with precision and prudence.”

Eric Lee

/

St. Louis Public RadioDarren Bailey, former GOP gubernatorial nominee and state representative, speaks during a campaign event last month in Millstadt.

Eric Lee

/

St. Louis Public RadioA man gestures in front of a voting registration banner during a campaign event for Darren Bailey, former GOP gubernatorial nominee and state representative, last month in Millstadt.

No one should go hungry in this country, he said. However, he said he’s always looking for a place to make cuts in the budget because there’s waste everywhere in government. He would also like to avoid creating new programs.“We don’t have to grow government and hire more people,” Bailey said.He said he feels the Energy Committee would be another logical choice for the district because of its ties to oil drilling and coal processing. Bailey is critical of the direction that the Illinois legislature and Gov. J.B. Pritzker’s administration have taken the state regarding energy. In 2021, the legislature passed and Pritzker signed the Climate and Equitable Jobs Act, which will require the state to be 100% carbon free by 2045.He said he’d like to explore legislation that opens up exporting coal from southern Illinois to foreign countries and increased fracking for oil.“It’s common sense stuff: We have to have oil,” Bailey said. “We have to have reliable energy.”The Education Committee is also something he’s passionate about after serving on his local school board in Louisville, Illinois, before entering the state legislature.While he doesn’t want to serve on the Veterans’ Affairs or Armed Services committees, Bailey said he wouldn’t have supported the National Defense Authorization Act in December 2021 that required military members to be vaccinated for COVID-19.One year later, the omnibus spending bill dropped the vaccine mandate. At the time, the requirement forced more than 8,400 troops out of the military, according to the Associated Press.That contributed to the military’s recruiting downturn, Bailey said.“I see a massive failure there,” he said.

Brian Munoz

/

St. Louis Public RadioA Donald Trump supporter cheers as the former president speaks in June 2022 at a “Save America!” Rally at the Adams County Fairgrounds near Quincy.

Trump endorsement of BostFormer President Donald Trump endorsed Bost over Bailey in February, saying Bost had represented the people of southern Illinois well.“While I like and respect Darren Bailey, and was proud to campaign for him in 2022, Mike Bost was one of the first House committee chairmen to endorse my campaign, and Mike was a stalwart supporter of our America First agenda during my record-setting administration,” Trump posted on his social media platform.In response to the endorsement, Bost said he’d do what he could to get Trump back in the White House.“It’s not the news that Darren Bailey wanted to receive,” John Shaw, a political science professor at Southern Illinois University Carbondale told the Belleville News-Democrat. “I’m reluctant to say it’s the ballgame.”Bailey equated the endorsement to a farmer needing rain in a drought.“The crops might not be as good as they could have been, but I got to work a little harder and make it up somewhere,” he said.Trump’s endorsement is not the only factor that makes Bailey an underdog in this race. Bost holds a comfortable fundraising and spending advantage.The latest reports from the Federal Elections Commission show Bost has nearly a 6-1 advantage in fundraising and more than 4-1 advantage in spending, according to data released at the end of 2023.Early voting began on Feb. 8, and in-person voting is March 19.

[ad_2]

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Poll: Support for Missouri abortion rights amendment growing

Published

on

[ad_1]


A proposed constitutional amendment legalizing abortion in Missouri received support from more than half of respondents in a new poll from St. Louis University and YouGov.That’s a boost from a poll earlier this year, which could mean what’s known as Amendment 3 is in a solid position to pass in November.SLU/YouGov’s poll of 900 likely Missouri voters from Aug. 8-16 found that 52% of respondents would vote for Amendment 3, which would place constitutional protections for abortion up to fetal viability. Thirty-four percent would vote against the measure, while 14% aren’t sure.By comparison, the SLU/YouGov poll from February found that 44% of voters would back the abortion legalization amendment.St. Louis University political science professor Steven Rogers said 32% of Republicans and 53% of independents would vote for the amendment. That’s in addition to nearly 80% of Democratic respondents who would approve the measure. In the previous poll, 24% of Republicans supported the amendment.Rogers noted that neither Amendment 3 nor a separate ballot item raising the state’s minimum wage is helping Democratic candidates. GOP contenders for U.S. Senate, governor, lieutenant governor, treasurer and secretary of state all hold comfortable leads.“We are seeing this kind of crossover voting, a little bit, where there are voters who are basically saying, ‘I am going to the polls and I’m going to support a Republican candidate, but I’m also going to go to the polls and then I’m also going to try to expand abortion access and then raise the minimum wage,’” Rogers said.Republican gubernatorial nominee Mike Kehoe has a 51%-41% lead over Democrat Crystal Quade. And U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley is leading Democrat Lucas Kunce by 53% to 42%. Some GOP candidates for attorney general, secretary of state and treasurer have even larger leads over their Democratic rivals.

Brian Munoz

/

St. Louis Public RadioHundreds of demonstrators pack into a parking lot at Planned Parenthood of St. Louis and Southwest Missouri on June 24, 2022, during a demonstration following the Supreme Court’s reversal of a case that guaranteed the constitutional right to an abortion.

One of the biggest challenges for foes of Amendment 3 could be financial.Typically, Missouri ballot initiatives with well-funded and well-organized campaigns have a better chance of passing — especially if the opposition is underfunded and disorganized. Since the end of July, the campaign committee formed to pass Amendment 3 received more than $3 million in donations of $5,000 or more.That money could be used for television advertisements to improve the proposal’s standing further, Rogers said, as well as point out that Missouri’s current abortion ban doesn’t allow the procedure in the case of rape or incest.“Meanwhile, the anti side won’t have those resources to kind of try to make that counter argument as strongly, and they don’t have public opinion as strongly on their side,” Rogers said.There is precedent of a well-funded initiative almost failing due to opposition from socially conservative voters.In 2006, a measure providing constitutional protections for embryonic stem cell research nearly failed — even though a campaign committee aimed at passing it had a commanding financial advantage.Former state Sen. Bob Onder was part of the opposition campaign to that measure. He said earlier this month it is possible to create a similar dynamic in 2024 against Amendment 3, if social conservatives who oppose abortion rights can band together.“This is not about reproductive rights or care for miscarriages or IVF or anything else,” said Onder, the GOP nominee for Missouri’s 3rd Congressional District seat. “Missourians will learn that out-of-state special interests and dark money from out of state is lying to them and they will reject this amendment.”Quade said earlier this month that Missourians of all political ideologies are ready to roll back the state’s abortion ban.“Regardless of political party, we hear from folks who are tired of politicians being in their doctor’s offices,” Quade said. “They want politicians to mind their own business. So this is going to excite folks all across the political spectrum.”

[ad_2]

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Democrat Mark Osmack makes his case for Missouri treasurer

Published

on

[ad_1]


Mark Osmack has been out of the electoral fray for awhile, but he never completely abandoned his passion for Missouri politics.Osmack, a Valley Park native and U.S. Army veteran, previously ran for Missouri’s 2nd Congressional District seat and for state Senate. Now he’s the Democratic nominee for state treasurer after receiving a phone call from Missouri Democratic Party Chairman Russ Carnahan asking him to run.“There’s a lot of decision making and processing and evaluation that goes into it, which is something I am very passionate and interested in,” Osmack said this week on an episode of Politically Speaking.Osmack is squaring off against state Treasurer Vivek Malek, who was able to easily win a crowded GOP primary against several veteran lawmakers including House Budget Chairman Cody Smith and state Sen. Andrew Koenig.While Malek was able to attract big donations to his political action committee and pour his own money into the campaign, Osmack isn’t worried that he won’t be able to compete in November. Since Malek was appointed to his post, Osmack contends he hasn’t proven that he’s a formidable opponent in a general election.“His actions and his decision making so far in his roughly two year tenure in that office have been questionable,” Osmack said.Among other things, Osmack was critical of Malek for placing unclaimed property notices on video gaming machines which are usually found in gas stations or convenience stores. The legality of the machines has been questioned for some time.As Malek explained on his own episode of Politically Speaking, he wanted to make sure the unclaimed property program was as widely advertised as possible. But he acknowledged it was a mistake to put the decals close to the machines and ultimately decided to remove them.Osmack said: “This doesn’t even pass the common sense sniff test of, ‘Hey, should I put state stickers claiming you might have a billion dollars on a gambling machine that is not registered with the state of Missouri?’ If we’re gonna give kudos for him acknowledging the wrong thing, it never should have been done in the first place.”Osmack’s platform includes supporting programs providing school meals using Missouri agriculture products and making child care more accessible for the working class.He said the fact that Missouri has such a large surplus shows that it’s possible to create programs to make child care within reach for parents.“It is quite audacious for [Republicans] to brag about $8 billion, with a B, dollars in state surplus, while we offer next to no social services to include pre-K, daycare, or child care,” Osmack said.Here’s are some other topics Osmack discussed on the show:How he would handle managing the state’s pension systems and approving low-income housing tax credits. The state treasurer’s office is on boards overseeing both of those programs.Malek’s decision to cut off investments from Chinese companies. Osmack said that Missouri needs to be cautious about abandoning China as a business partner, especially since they’re a major consumer of the state’s agriculture products. “There’s a way to make this work where we are not supporting communist nations to the detriment of the United States or our allies, while also maintaining strong economic ties that benefit Missouri farmers,” he said.What it was like to witness the skirmish at the Missouri State Fair between U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley and Democratic challenger Lucas Kunce.Whether Kunce can get the support of influential groups like the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, which often channels money and staff to states with competitive Senate elections.

[ad_2]

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

As Illinois receives praise for its cannabis equity efforts, stakeholders work on system’s flaws

Published

on

[ad_1]


Medical marijuana patients can now purchase cannabis grown by small businesses as part of their allotment, Illinois’ top cannabis regulator said, but smaller, newly licensed cannabis growers are still seeking greater access to the state’s medical marijuana customers.Illinois legalized medicinal marijuana beginning in 2014, then legalized it for recreational use in 2020. While the 2020 law legalized cannabis use for any adult age 21 or older, it did not expand licensing for medical dispensaries.Patients can purchase marijuana as part of the medical cannabis program at dual-purpose dispensaries, which are licensed to serve both medical and recreational customers. But dual-purpose dispensaries are greatly outnumbered by dispensaries only licensed to sell recreationally, and there are no medical-only dispensaries in the state.As another part of the adult-use legalization law, lawmakers created a “craft grow” license category that was designed to give more opportunities to Illinoisans hoping to legally grow and sell marijuana. The smaller-scale grow operations were part of the 2020 law’s efforts to diversify the cannabis industry in Illinois.Prior to that, all cultivation centers in Illinois were large-scale operations dominated by large multi-state operators. The existing cultivators, mostly in operation since 2014, were allowed to grow recreational cannabis beginning in 2019.Until recently, dual-purpose dispensaries have been unsure as to whether craft-grown products, made by social equity licensees — those who have lived in a disproportionately impacted area or have been historically impacted by the war on drugs — can be sold medicinally as part of a patient’s medical allotment.Erin Johnson, the state’s cannabis regulation oversight officer, told Capitol News Illinois last month that her office has “been telling dispensaries, as they have been asking us” they can now sell craft-grown products to medical patients.“There was just a track and trace issue on our end, but never anything statutorily,” she said.

Dilpreet Raju

/

Capitol News IllinoisThe graphic shows how cannabis grown in Illinois gets from cultivation centers to customers.

No notice has been posted, but Johnson’s verbal guidance comes almost two years after the first craft grow business went online in Illinois.It allows roughly 150,000 medical patients, who dispensary owners say are the most consistent purchasers of marijuana, to buy products made by social equity businesses without paying recreational taxes. However — even as more dispensaries open — the number available to medical patients has not increased since 2018, something the Cannabis Regulation Oversight Office “desperately” wants to see changed. Johnson said Illinois is a limited license state, meaning “there are caps on everything” to help control the relatively new market.Berwyn Thompkins, who operates two cannabis businesses, said the rules limited options for patients and small businesses.“It’s about access,” Thompkins said. “Why wouldn’t we want all the patients — which the (adult-use) program was initially built around — why wouldn’t we want them to have access? They should have access to any dispensary.”Customers with a medical marijuana card pay a 1% tax on all marijuana products, whereas recreational customers pay retail taxes between roughly 20 and 40% on a given cannabis product, when accounting for local taxes.While Illinois has received praise for its equity-focused cannabis law, including through an independent study that showed more people of color own cannabis licenses than in any other state, some industry operators say they’ve experienced many unnecessary hurdles getting their businesses up and running.The state, in fact, announced last month that it had opened its 100th social equity dispensary.But Steve Olson, purchasing manager at a pair of dispensaries (including one dual-purpose dispensary) near Rockford, said small specialty license holders have been left in the lurch since the first craft grower opened in October 2022.“You would think that this would be something they’re (the government) trying to help out these social equity companies with, but they’re putting handcuffs on them in so many different spots,” he said. “One of them being this medical thing.”Olson said he contacted state agencies, including the Department of Financial and Professional Regulation, months ago about whether craft products can be sold to medical patients at their retail tax rate, but only heard one response: “They all say it was an oversight.”This potentially hurt social equity companies because they sell wholesale to dispensaries and may have been missing out on a consistent customer base through those medical dispensaries.Olson said the state’s attempts to provide licensees with a path to a successful business over the years, such as with corrective lotteries that granted more social equity licenses, have come up short.“It’s like they almost set up the social equity thing to fail so the big guys could come in and swoop up all these licenses,” Olson said. “I hate to feel like that but, if you look at it, it’s pretty black and white.”Olson said craft companies benefit from any type of retail sale.“If we sell it to medical patients or not, it’s a matter of, ‘Are we collecting the proper taxes?’ That’s all it is,” he said.State revenue from cannabis taxes, licensing costs and other fees goes into the Cannabis Regulation Fund, which is used to fund a host of programs, including cannabis offense expungement, the general revenue fund, and the R3 campaign aiming to uplift disinvested communities.For fiscal year 2024, nearly $256 million was paid out from Cannabis Regulation Fund for related initiatives, which includes almost $89 million transferred to the state’s general revenue fund and more than $20 million distributed to local governments, according to the Illinois Department of Revenue.Medical access still limitedThe state’s 55 medical dispensaries that predate the 2020 legalization law, mostly owned by publicly traded multistate operators that had been operating in Illinois since 2014 under the state’s medical marijuana program, were automatically granted a right to licenses to sell recreationally in January 2020. That gave them a dual-purpose license that no new entrants into the market can receive under current law.Since expanding their clientele in 2020, Illinois dispensaries have sold more than $6 billion worth of cannabis products through recreational transactions alone.Nearly two-thirds of dispensaries licensed to sell to medical patients are in the northeast counties of Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake and Will. Dual-purpose dispensaries only represent about 20 percent of the state’s dispensaries.While the state began offering recreational dispensary licenses since the adult-use legalization law passed, it has not granted a new medical dispensary license since 2018. That has allowed the established players to continue to corner the market on the state’s nearly 150,000 medical marijuana patients.But social equity licensees and advocates say there are more ways to level the playing field, including expanding access to medical sales.Johnson, who became the state’s top cannabis regulator in late 2022, expressed hope for movement during the fall veto session on House Bill 2911, which would expand medical access to all Illinois dispensaries.“We would like every single dispensary in Illinois to be able to serve medical patients,” Johnson said. “It’s something that medical patients have been asking for, for years.”Johnson said the bill would benefit patients and small businesses.“It’s something we desperately want to happen as a state system, because we want to make sure that medical patients are able to easily access what they need,” she said. “We also think it’s good for our social equity dispensaries, as they’re opening, to be able to serve medical patients.”Rep. Bob Morgan, D-Deerfield, who was the first statewide project coordinator for Illinois’ medical cannabis program prior to joining the legislature, wrote in an email to Capitol News Illinois that the state needs to be doing more for its patients.“Illinois is failing the state’s 150,000 medical cannabis patients with debilitating conditions. Too many are still denied the patient protections they deserve, including access to their medicine,” Morgan wrote, adding he would continue to work with stakeholders on further legislation.Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news service covering state government. It is distributed to hundreds of newspapers, radio and TV stations statewide. It is funded primarily by the Illinois Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation, along with major contributions from the Illinois Broadcasters Foundation and Southern Illinois Editorial Association.

[ad_2]

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending