Connect with us

Politics

Washington Park mayor and village trustees clash over meetings

Published

on

[ad_1]


Editor’s note: This story was originally published in the Belleville News-Democrat.Washington Park trustees say Mayor Leonard Moore has been locking them out of a building where they want to meet to conduct village business.“When we call special meetings, he doesn’t attend and won’t open the door for us to hold a meeting,” said longtime Trustee Ferris Williams, speaking for all six board members.Moore says trustees are welcome to attend regular meetings scheduled monthly in the building — Washington Park Senior Center — but can’t use it at other times because it is temporarily housing the police department.“We have prisoners in and out of the building. We have important information in there. That is our one and only location for all of these things. No one will have free will to go in and out of there as they please,” Moore said.The dispute is just a snapshot of the contentious nature of village government in Washington Park. The mayor and the six trustees don’t get along, and point fingers at each other about who’s to blame.If it sounds familiar, a similar dispute with a few of the same cast of characters happened two years ago. It ended up in court.There’s been another election since then, and some of the board members have changed since the 2021 dispute. Former allies of Moore are no longer on the board, with three new trustees replacing them.Now it’s basically the six trustees — Carlene Tucker, Geneva Dotson, Ferris Williams, Mary McKinney, James Madkins and Juliette Gosa – on one side, versus Moore on the other.And between the two sides is Washington Park Village Attorney Mark Peebles. He works on behalf of the town, and is the official, legal representative for its government.Peebles said he wishes he could do something to bring the trustees and mayor together to work out whatever personal differences they have with each other.“I just feel like right now, things are not moving in a positive, constructive way,” he said in an interview with the BND. “If there’s anything that I can do in my capacity as village attorney to help move it forward, I would certainly do it. I don’t have a vote. All I can do is just give advice.“I’d like to see if there is any common ground between the elected officials where they can come together and deal with some issues that are pressing in the village right now.”When you listen to both sides today, it is hard to imagine them coming together.Trustees, mayor fight over meeting agenda

Carolyn P. Smith

/

Belleville News-Democrat trustees Washington Park’s Village Board protested against newly-elected Mayor Leonard Moore.Washington Park’s Village Board trustees protest against newly-elected Mayor Leonard Moore in 2021 in Washington Park.

The six trustees say the mayor wants to run the city his way and not work with them.“We’ve tried to put items on the agenda and Mayor Leonard Moore is not allowing any items we want on the agenda to be put on the agenda,” Trustee Juliette Gosa said. “We are elected board members and we have a right to put items on the agenda.”Moore says the trustees don’t want to do things the right way. “When the six of them come to the regularly scheduled meetings, they try to override my agenda that was already posted properly,” Moore said. “They stand up and object to everything on the agenda to disrupt the flow and not deal with city business.”And trustees don’t even attend all the regularly scheduled meetings, held on the third Tuesday of each month, Moore said.That’s because “there’s no point in going. He sets these things up and says it’s my way or the highway,” Eric Evans, a lawyer who represented the six trustees, said in an interview with the BND. Evans passed away in early July.Trustees said they call separate special meetings and are forced to meet at local churches because the mayor won’t let them use a government building. They complain that the mayor does not attend those special sessions.Moore said they can call special meetings if they want, but he is not obligated to attend nor are any of their actions official.“…No decisions can be made, and they can’t pass anything,” he said. “Resolutions or whatever have to be signed by the clerk and the president of the board (the mayor) at a regular meeting.”Evans disagreed, saying the trustees can call separate meetings and take actions.“He views it that he is the boss and everybody works for him,” Evans said. “The board can call a meeting as long as they follow certain procedures, which they did. His response was ‘Well, I’m going to lock you out.’ Well, you can’t do that.”In response to a BND question about the trustees’ special meetings, Peebles said he believes two trustees can call a meeting, if they so choose. “I’ve seen some of the agendas and they look like they comply with the law, but I have no idea whether they have been noticed properly under the Open Meetings Act,“ he said. “If they are not, any actions that are taken at those meetings are not valid.”The list of grievances and the mayor’s responseBesides the meeting situation, the six trustees have a list of grievances about the mayor. Here is a sampling:The trustees say Moore has kept them in the dark about village business, from finances to grant applications. “The mayor is not informing us about anything that is going on in the village or with village business,” Williams said. “We don’t know how much is coming in or going out.”The trustees allege the village ended up losing a $500,000 government grant for a summer youth employment program because the mayor didn’t work with Treasurer Carla Randolph to get it.Some trustees are concerned that some police cars were moved off of village property and onto a residents’ land. The trustees say Moore has not explained why.The trustees say Moore is keeping his wife, Debbie Moore, on as the village clerk in Washington Park, even though “he knows we don’t want this.” Moore is a former trustee who lost her seat in the April election.Moore disputed the trustees’ allegations and grievances, and addressed each one in a BND interview.He said he doesn’t keep the trustees in the dark about village business. He said the trustees, before every regular meeting, get a statement on village bank accounts down to the penny. The account statements are included in their agenda packets available before every regular monthly meeting. “They see whatever money is going out and coming in,” Moore said. The packets are available every Friday before the Tuesday monthly meetings.Concerning the village clerk, the mayor said he has the right to appoint whoever he chooses and that is what he did.Moore said the trustees’ statements about the jobs grant are spurious: He did not lose the grant. He said he did not accept the grant money — $500,000 — because the village would have been required to spend all of it employing local youth within 30 days. “The $500,000 grant will be available for us to use next year for the summer youth program,” he said. “We know what to do now. We applied for the grant too late to be able to spend it all in the required time. Everything I do is going to be above board.” (Randolph confirmed the grant was approved but by the time they received approval there was not enough time to spend it.)Moore said the old police cars were moved from village property because they were a nuisance. “People were complaining about them being an eyesore” he said. “They were moved to a yard where they are under surveillance. Now, that area is clean. We’re going to make the area where the cars were into a park like it used to be.”Court order issued in 2021 disputeThis isn’t the first time the mayor and the board of trustees have been battling over how to run the village. Three of the current trustees filed suit against Moore two years ago over a number of complaints.St. Clair County Circuit Court Associate Judge Julie Katz issued an order that said the parties in the lawsuit are ‘’strongly encouraged to work together for the betterment of the Washington Park community … to consider team building exercises, ideally led by a trained professional … to form subcommittees, and utilize these subcommittees in a constructive manner to more efficiently accomplish city business … to agree on a process whereby proposed agenda items which were not taken up at a meeting be given priority at the next meeting.”But two years later, the trustees and the mayor are still going at it. The trustees say they are trying to do their jobs for the citizens of the town, but the mayor is not working with them. “We would be behind him 100 percent if he was representing the Village of Washington Park,” said Madkins, one of the trustees. “His leadership is mostly for family and friends, but not for the citizens.” Moore said he is following the law and trying to do what’s right as he leads the village. “The blame goes to so-called politics and politicians with personal agendas rather than the people’s agenda,” he said. For Peebles, the village attorney, the entire situation is frustrating, especially since the community has so many issues that need to be addressed. “One or two meetings a month is not going to accomplish much. I think the mayor and the board need to find some common ground,” he said. “This is just not in the best interests of the residents of Washington Park – all of the elected officials disagreeing and not holding meetings. I don’t know what the answer is.’’

[ad_2]

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Poll: Support for Missouri abortion rights amendment growing

Published

on

[ad_1]


A proposed constitutional amendment legalizing abortion in Missouri received support from more than half of respondents in a new poll from St. Louis University and YouGov.That’s a boost from a poll earlier this year, which could mean what’s known as Amendment 3 is in a solid position to pass in November.SLU/YouGov’s poll of 900 likely Missouri voters from Aug. 8-16 found that 52% of respondents would vote for Amendment 3, which would place constitutional protections for abortion up to fetal viability. Thirty-four percent would vote against the measure, while 14% aren’t sure.By comparison, the SLU/YouGov poll from February found that 44% of voters would back the abortion legalization amendment.St. Louis University political science professor Steven Rogers said 32% of Republicans and 53% of independents would vote for the amendment. That’s in addition to nearly 80% of Democratic respondents who would approve the measure. In the previous poll, 24% of Republicans supported the amendment.Rogers noted that neither Amendment 3 nor a separate ballot item raising the state’s minimum wage is helping Democratic candidates. GOP contenders for U.S. Senate, governor, lieutenant governor, treasurer and secretary of state all hold comfortable leads.“We are seeing this kind of crossover voting, a little bit, where there are voters who are basically saying, ‘I am going to the polls and I’m going to support a Republican candidate, but I’m also going to go to the polls and then I’m also going to try to expand abortion access and then raise the minimum wage,’” Rogers said.Republican gubernatorial nominee Mike Kehoe has a 51%-41% lead over Democrat Crystal Quade. And U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley is leading Democrat Lucas Kunce by 53% to 42%. Some GOP candidates for attorney general, secretary of state and treasurer have even larger leads over their Democratic rivals.

Brian Munoz

/

St. Louis Public RadioHundreds of demonstrators pack into a parking lot at Planned Parenthood of St. Louis and Southwest Missouri on June 24, 2022, during a demonstration following the Supreme Court’s reversal of a case that guaranteed the constitutional right to an abortion.

One of the biggest challenges for foes of Amendment 3 could be financial.Typically, Missouri ballot initiatives with well-funded and well-organized campaigns have a better chance of passing — especially if the opposition is underfunded and disorganized. Since the end of July, the campaign committee formed to pass Amendment 3 received more than $3 million in donations of $5,000 or more.That money could be used for television advertisements to improve the proposal’s standing further, Rogers said, as well as point out that Missouri’s current abortion ban doesn’t allow the procedure in the case of rape or incest.“Meanwhile, the anti side won’t have those resources to kind of try to make that counter argument as strongly, and they don’t have public opinion as strongly on their side,” Rogers said.There is precedent of a well-funded initiative almost failing due to opposition from socially conservative voters.In 2006, a measure providing constitutional protections for embryonic stem cell research nearly failed — even though a campaign committee aimed at passing it had a commanding financial advantage.Former state Sen. Bob Onder was part of the opposition campaign to that measure. He said earlier this month it is possible to create a similar dynamic in 2024 against Amendment 3, if social conservatives who oppose abortion rights can band together.“This is not about reproductive rights or care for miscarriages or IVF or anything else,” said Onder, the GOP nominee for Missouri’s 3rd Congressional District seat. “Missourians will learn that out-of-state special interests and dark money from out of state is lying to them and they will reject this amendment.”Quade said earlier this month that Missourians of all political ideologies are ready to roll back the state’s abortion ban.“Regardless of political party, we hear from folks who are tired of politicians being in their doctor’s offices,” Quade said. “They want politicians to mind their own business. So this is going to excite folks all across the political spectrum.”

[ad_2]

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Democrat Mark Osmack makes his case for Missouri treasurer

Published

on

[ad_1]


Mark Osmack has been out of the electoral fray for awhile, but he never completely abandoned his passion for Missouri politics.Osmack, a Valley Park native and U.S. Army veteran, previously ran for Missouri’s 2nd Congressional District seat and for state Senate. Now he’s the Democratic nominee for state treasurer after receiving a phone call from Missouri Democratic Party Chairman Russ Carnahan asking him to run.“There’s a lot of decision making and processing and evaluation that goes into it, which is something I am very passionate and interested in,” Osmack said this week on an episode of Politically Speaking.Osmack is squaring off against state Treasurer Vivek Malek, who was able to easily win a crowded GOP primary against several veteran lawmakers including House Budget Chairman Cody Smith and state Sen. Andrew Koenig.While Malek was able to attract big donations to his political action committee and pour his own money into the campaign, Osmack isn’t worried that he won’t be able to compete in November. Since Malek was appointed to his post, Osmack contends he hasn’t proven that he’s a formidable opponent in a general election.“His actions and his decision making so far in his roughly two year tenure in that office have been questionable,” Osmack said.Among other things, Osmack was critical of Malek for placing unclaimed property notices on video gaming machines which are usually found in gas stations or convenience stores. The legality of the machines has been questioned for some time.As Malek explained on his own episode of Politically Speaking, he wanted to make sure the unclaimed property program was as widely advertised as possible. But he acknowledged it was a mistake to put the decals close to the machines and ultimately decided to remove them.Osmack said: “This doesn’t even pass the common sense sniff test of, ‘Hey, should I put state stickers claiming you might have a billion dollars on a gambling machine that is not registered with the state of Missouri?’ If we’re gonna give kudos for him acknowledging the wrong thing, it never should have been done in the first place.”Osmack’s platform includes supporting programs providing school meals using Missouri agriculture products and making child care more accessible for the working class.He said the fact that Missouri has such a large surplus shows that it’s possible to create programs to make child care within reach for parents.“It is quite audacious for [Republicans] to brag about $8 billion, with a B, dollars in state surplus, while we offer next to no social services to include pre-K, daycare, or child care,” Osmack said.Here’s are some other topics Osmack discussed on the show:How he would handle managing the state’s pension systems and approving low-income housing tax credits. The state treasurer’s office is on boards overseeing both of those programs.Malek’s decision to cut off investments from Chinese companies. Osmack said that Missouri needs to be cautious about abandoning China as a business partner, especially since they’re a major consumer of the state’s agriculture products. “There’s a way to make this work where we are not supporting communist nations to the detriment of the United States or our allies, while also maintaining strong economic ties that benefit Missouri farmers,” he said.What it was like to witness the skirmish at the Missouri State Fair between U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley and Democratic challenger Lucas Kunce.Whether Kunce can get the support of influential groups like the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, which often channels money and staff to states with competitive Senate elections.

[ad_2]

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

As Illinois receives praise for its cannabis equity efforts, stakeholders work on system’s flaws

Published

on

[ad_1]


Medical marijuana patients can now purchase cannabis grown by small businesses as part of their allotment, Illinois’ top cannabis regulator said, but smaller, newly licensed cannabis growers are still seeking greater access to the state’s medical marijuana customers.Illinois legalized medicinal marijuana beginning in 2014, then legalized it for recreational use in 2020. While the 2020 law legalized cannabis use for any adult age 21 or older, it did not expand licensing for medical dispensaries.Patients can purchase marijuana as part of the medical cannabis program at dual-purpose dispensaries, which are licensed to serve both medical and recreational customers. But dual-purpose dispensaries are greatly outnumbered by dispensaries only licensed to sell recreationally, and there are no medical-only dispensaries in the state.As another part of the adult-use legalization law, lawmakers created a “craft grow” license category that was designed to give more opportunities to Illinoisans hoping to legally grow and sell marijuana. The smaller-scale grow operations were part of the 2020 law’s efforts to diversify the cannabis industry in Illinois.Prior to that, all cultivation centers in Illinois were large-scale operations dominated by large multi-state operators. The existing cultivators, mostly in operation since 2014, were allowed to grow recreational cannabis beginning in 2019.Until recently, dual-purpose dispensaries have been unsure as to whether craft-grown products, made by social equity licensees — those who have lived in a disproportionately impacted area or have been historically impacted by the war on drugs — can be sold medicinally as part of a patient’s medical allotment.Erin Johnson, the state’s cannabis regulation oversight officer, told Capitol News Illinois last month that her office has “been telling dispensaries, as they have been asking us” they can now sell craft-grown products to medical patients.“There was just a track and trace issue on our end, but never anything statutorily,” she said.

Dilpreet Raju

/

Capitol News IllinoisThe graphic shows how cannabis grown in Illinois gets from cultivation centers to customers.

No notice has been posted, but Johnson’s verbal guidance comes almost two years after the first craft grow business went online in Illinois.It allows roughly 150,000 medical patients, who dispensary owners say are the most consistent purchasers of marijuana, to buy products made by social equity businesses without paying recreational taxes. However — even as more dispensaries open — the number available to medical patients has not increased since 2018, something the Cannabis Regulation Oversight Office “desperately” wants to see changed. Johnson said Illinois is a limited license state, meaning “there are caps on everything” to help control the relatively new market.Berwyn Thompkins, who operates two cannabis businesses, said the rules limited options for patients and small businesses.“It’s about access,” Thompkins said. “Why wouldn’t we want all the patients — which the (adult-use) program was initially built around — why wouldn’t we want them to have access? They should have access to any dispensary.”Customers with a medical marijuana card pay a 1% tax on all marijuana products, whereas recreational customers pay retail taxes between roughly 20 and 40% on a given cannabis product, when accounting for local taxes.While Illinois has received praise for its equity-focused cannabis law, including through an independent study that showed more people of color own cannabis licenses than in any other state, some industry operators say they’ve experienced many unnecessary hurdles getting their businesses up and running.The state, in fact, announced last month that it had opened its 100th social equity dispensary.But Steve Olson, purchasing manager at a pair of dispensaries (including one dual-purpose dispensary) near Rockford, said small specialty license holders have been left in the lurch since the first craft grower opened in October 2022.“You would think that this would be something they’re (the government) trying to help out these social equity companies with, but they’re putting handcuffs on them in so many different spots,” he said. “One of them being this medical thing.”Olson said he contacted state agencies, including the Department of Financial and Professional Regulation, months ago about whether craft products can be sold to medical patients at their retail tax rate, but only heard one response: “They all say it was an oversight.”This potentially hurt social equity companies because they sell wholesale to dispensaries and may have been missing out on a consistent customer base through those medical dispensaries.Olson said the state’s attempts to provide licensees with a path to a successful business over the years, such as with corrective lotteries that granted more social equity licenses, have come up short.“It’s like they almost set up the social equity thing to fail so the big guys could come in and swoop up all these licenses,” Olson said. “I hate to feel like that but, if you look at it, it’s pretty black and white.”Olson said craft companies benefit from any type of retail sale.“If we sell it to medical patients or not, it’s a matter of, ‘Are we collecting the proper taxes?’ That’s all it is,” he said.State revenue from cannabis taxes, licensing costs and other fees goes into the Cannabis Regulation Fund, which is used to fund a host of programs, including cannabis offense expungement, the general revenue fund, and the R3 campaign aiming to uplift disinvested communities.For fiscal year 2024, nearly $256 million was paid out from Cannabis Regulation Fund for related initiatives, which includes almost $89 million transferred to the state’s general revenue fund and more than $20 million distributed to local governments, according to the Illinois Department of Revenue.Medical access still limitedThe state’s 55 medical dispensaries that predate the 2020 legalization law, mostly owned by publicly traded multistate operators that had been operating in Illinois since 2014 under the state’s medical marijuana program, were automatically granted a right to licenses to sell recreationally in January 2020. That gave them a dual-purpose license that no new entrants into the market can receive under current law.Since expanding their clientele in 2020, Illinois dispensaries have sold more than $6 billion worth of cannabis products through recreational transactions alone.Nearly two-thirds of dispensaries licensed to sell to medical patients are in the northeast counties of Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake and Will. Dual-purpose dispensaries only represent about 20 percent of the state’s dispensaries.While the state began offering recreational dispensary licenses since the adult-use legalization law passed, it has not granted a new medical dispensary license since 2018. That has allowed the established players to continue to corner the market on the state’s nearly 150,000 medical marijuana patients.But social equity licensees and advocates say there are more ways to level the playing field, including expanding access to medical sales.Johnson, who became the state’s top cannabis regulator in late 2022, expressed hope for movement during the fall veto session on House Bill 2911, which would expand medical access to all Illinois dispensaries.“We would like every single dispensary in Illinois to be able to serve medical patients,” Johnson said. “It’s something that medical patients have been asking for, for years.”Johnson said the bill would benefit patients and small businesses.“It’s something we desperately want to happen as a state system, because we want to make sure that medical patients are able to easily access what they need,” she said. “We also think it’s good for our social equity dispensaries, as they’re opening, to be able to serve medical patients.”Rep. Bob Morgan, D-Deerfield, who was the first statewide project coordinator for Illinois’ medical cannabis program prior to joining the legislature, wrote in an email to Capitol News Illinois that the state needs to be doing more for its patients.“Illinois is failing the state’s 150,000 medical cannabis patients with debilitating conditions. Too many are still denied the patient protections they deserve, including access to their medicine,” Morgan wrote, adding he would continue to work with stakeholders on further legislation.Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news service covering state government. It is distributed to hundreds of newspapers, radio and TV stations statewide. It is funded primarily by the Illinois Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation, along with major contributions from the Illinois Broadcasters Foundation and Southern Illinois Editorial Association.

[ad_2]

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending