Connect with us

Local News

Veteran Journalist Says Israel’s Actions Are a ‘War Crime,’ Not a Genocide | St. Louis Metro News | St. Louis

Published

on

[ad_1]


click to enlarge Courtesy St. Louis Jewish Book Fair Martin Fletcher is a longtime Middle East correspondent and the former NBC Tel Aviv bureau chief. For Martin Fletcher, the war between Israel and Hamas could hardly have gotten more personal. Within the last week, two of his extended family members, Judith and Natalie Raanan, were released by Hamas. It was a relief for the family, which saw three other members killed by the terrorist organization in the October 7 attacks even as others are still being held hostage.

There are few more qualified than Fletcher — a longtime Middle East correspondent and former NBC Tel Aviv bureau chief — to understand the situation inside the divided country, and he’ll soon be in St. Louis to open the Jewish Book Festival on Sunday, November 5, and discuss both the conflict and his new book Teachers: The Ones I Can’t Forget.

Fletcher spoke with the RFT yesterday by phone from New York City to share his perspective on what’s happening these days in Gaza. This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

What has it been like to have something you covered professionally hit so close to home?

It’s been a rollercoaster of emotion. You know, on the one hand, I’m on NBC and MSNBC, and all the different stations, many times a day. So I’m trying to be cool and professional and analyze strategically what’s going on. At the same time, knowing that my wife was crying full time the first week, for instance, and trying to balance the personal emotions and the professional, it’s difficult.

What can you tell us about covering Israel from within? What can we not understand not having been in your shoes?

I think probably a lot of people have been in my shoes. So many Jews visit Israel, and have family. They’re connected in some way and feel strongly about the question. On the other hand, there’s a whole other group of people whose rights need to be met. There’s always a contradiction. People always ask, “Which side is right, which side is wrong?” The problem is no one’s wrong. They’re both right. Not in what they do but in terms of their needs.

It seems like it’s hard for people to balance empathy for both peoples.

The difficulty of balancing both sides is something that most people share. If you’re rabidly Zionist, if you’re rabidly anti-Zionist, you’re never going to agree, and it’s not a matter of rational persuasion. You know, anti-Zionism definitely does bleed into antisemitism; you can certainly be against Israel and love the Jews. But in many cases, one roughly bleeds into the other. It is the same with the Arabs, the same pattern; there’s a lot of antipathy toward some Arabs. 

From the year 632, since the days of Mohammed, the followers of the Quran read the same things in the Quran, which is to kill the Jews, kill the Jews behind the trees in the stones — there’s many different quotations. Mostly, over the centuries, Jews and Muslims have lived in relative peace side by side. But when the Muslim Brotherhood was founded in Egypt — and Hamas is an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood — they just went back to the original Quran and well, Muhammad said that’s what we’re going to do. So they’re living in a time of literally 630 AD. How can you balance that with the Jewish desire to have a state of their own? Looking for balance is basically impossible. 

Going back so far, you think that’s just history. That’s so far away, we have to deal with the realities of today. I would have said exactly that, until the seventh of October, when suddenly you realize, “Wait a minute, that phrase ‘never again,’ after the Holocaust ‘never again,’ now it’s actually happening.” When a group of people come and slaughter, murderer, cut off their heads, torture, rape and kill 1,400 Jews in a day, you have to think, “Well, maybe.”

Aren’t the Israelis perpetrating something akin to why we say “never again”?

I think the answer to that question is that there’s a difference between genocide, what happened to the Jews, and what has happened to Palestinians, which I would say is tragedy. Genocide is when you deliberately sit down and massacre a nation. That’s what genocide is. That’s what happened to the Jews, 6 million. So is Israel committing genocide against the Palestinians? The answer is no. They’re not setting out to massacre the Palestinians or to eliminate the Palestinian nation, but fighting a war against Hamas, which is inside the civilian population. Israel is doing what they think they have to do, and what’s happening to the Palestinian civilians is an absolute tragedy. But it’s a tragic consequence of the genocide that Hamas wants to commit on the Jews.

What Israel is doing in Gaza is a humanitarian disaster. It is a war crime, but it’s not against and it’s not aimed against the civilians. They’re not trying to kill civilians. That’s why they told the civilians to leave the north and go to the south to get out of the way to empty the battlefields so that they can fight Hamas. I think about 700,000 Palestinians have gone south from the north. At the same time, 200,000 Israelis inside Israel have also left their homes in the south on Israeli government recommendation, for the same reason: to clear the battlefield. I think genocide is when you deliberately set out to stamp out a nation. Tragedy is the terrible consequence of war.

The New York Timestook heat after reporting that an Israeli rocket had hit the hospital in Gaza, which later turned out to be false. As a journalist, how do you balance reporting something quickly and knowing that you might be inflaming tensions around the world if you’re incorrect?

The fact that the New York Times corrected its site, and also so did the BBC, is excellent. It took them one week to do it, so that’s a problem. Many other organizations, including the AP, did not correct themselves. 

It’s this question of rushing to judgment — simply rushing to quote the first source that came up, which was Hamas. We threw out any possibility of knowing, said, “Israel did it, and there are 500 dead.” I mean, they said that within minutes, and when we suddenly saw the pictures, there’s a “Wait a minute, that’s a car park, all those cars were burned. There’s no huge damage to the buildings nearby.” You can see that. So what’s the story here? There’s obviously a question right away from anybody who actually wanted to look, and so I did, that wasn’t from above. It wasn’t an Israeli rocket: There would have been a huge crater; there would have been a lot more damage. And how come 500 people were in the compound? However many were killed, whatever the final number turns out to be, 500 is obviously way too many. 

But let me just say the answer to the wider question, this thing about journalism. In the world of social media, it’s all about getting the first eyeballs, right? It’s all about getting that first click. When there’s news, people rush to see what’s going on. They click on probably the first or second story that comes up, and they read it, and that’s their information. So all the news organizations are competing now to be first, when before it was really a matter of, “Yes, being first is very important. But more important is to be accurate.” This race between being first and being accurate is a contradiction, and it leads to these kinds of mistakes, when you just use the first source available. In this case, the source was Hamas, which is a totally unreliable source.

By the way, I teach writing, and I talked about this with one of the people I’m working with. What I emphasize is that you don’t make a career by getting it right: That’s your job. But you can lose a career by getting it wrong.

Catch Martin Fletcher at 7 p.m. on Sunday, November 5, at the Jewish Community Center (2 Millstone Campus Drive) as part of the St. Louis Jewish Book Festival. Tickets are $40. More information at jccstl.com/arts-ideas/st-louis-jewish-book-festival.

Email the author at [email protected]

Subscribe to Riverfront Times newsletters.Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | Or sign up for our RSS Feed

[ad_2]

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Local News

Fenton Man Charged in Sword Attack on Roommate

Published

on

[ad_1]

A warrant is out for a Fenton man’s arrest after he allegedly attacked his roommate with a sword. 

Police say that on Sunday, Angelus Scott spoke openly about “slicing his roommate’s head” before he grabbed a sword, raised it up and then swung it down at the roommate. 

The roommate grabbed Scott’s hand in time to prevent injury. When police arrived at the scene, they found the weapon used in the assault. 

The sword in question was a katana, which is a Japanese sword recognizable for its curved blade. 

This isn’t the first time a samurai-style sword has been used to violent effect in St. Louis. In 2018, a man hearing voices slaughtered his ex-boyfriend with a samurai sword. His mother said he suffered from schizoaffective disorder.

As for Scott, 35, the St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office was charged yesterday with two felonies, assault first degree and armed criminal action. The warrant for his arrest says he is to be held on $200,000 bond.

Subscribe to Riverfront Times newsletters.Follow us: Apple News |  Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | Or sign up for our RSS Feed

[ad_2]

Source link

Continue Reading

Local News

Caught on Video, Sheriff Says He’s Ready to ‘Turn It All Over’ to Deputy

Published

on

[ad_1]

Video of St. Louis Sheriff Vernon Betts taken by a former deputy suggests that the sheriff has a successor in mind to hand the reins of the department over to, even as Betts is in an increasingly heated campaign for reelection. 

“I ain’t here for all this rigmarole,” Betts says in the video while seated behind his desk at the Carnahan Courthouse. “The Lord sent me here to turn this department around and I’m doing the best I can and I think I’ve done a good job. I’ve got about eight months and I’m going to qualify for my fourth pension.”

He goes on, “Right now I can walk up out of here and live happily ever after and forget about all this…and live like a king.”

The sheriff then says his wife has been in Atlanta looking at houses and that the other deputy in the room, Donald Hawkins, is someone Betts has been training “to turn it all over to him.”

Asked about the video, Betts tells the RFT, “My future plans are to win reelection on August 6th by a wide margin and to continue my mission as the top elected law enforcement official to make St. Louis safer and stronger. Serving the people of St. Louis with integrity, honor and professional law enforcement qualifications is a sacred responsibility, and I intend to complete that mission.”

The video of Betts was taken by Barbara Chavers, who retired from the sheriff’s office in 2016 after 24 years of service. Chavers now works security at Schnucks at Grand and Gravois. Betts’ brother Howard works security there, too.

Chavers tells the RFT that she was summoned to Betts’ office last week after Betts’ brother made the sheriff aware that she was supporting Montgomery. It was no secret: Chavers had filmed a Facebook live video in which she said she was supporting Betts’ opponent Alfred Montgomery in the election this fall. “Make the judges safe,” she says in the video, standing in front of a large Montgomery sign on Gravois Avenue. “They need a sheriff who is going to make their courtrooms safe.”

In his office, even as Chavers made clear she was filming him, Betts told Chavers he was “flabbergasted” and “stunned” she was supporting Montgomery. 

“I don’t know what I did that would make you go against the preacher man,” he says, referring to himself. He then refers to Montgomery as “ungodly.” 

Betts goes on to say that not long ago, he was walking in his neighborhood on St. Louis Avenue near 20th Street when suddenly Montgomery pulled up in his car and, according to Betts, shouted, “You motherfucker, you this, you that. You’re taking my signs down.”

Montgomery tells the RFT that he’s never interacted with Betts outside of candidate forums and neighborhood meetings. 

“I don’t think anyone with good sense would do something like that to a sitting sheriff,” Montgomery says.

Montgomery has had campaign signs missing and on at least two occasions has obtained video of people tearing them down. (Chavers notes that the sign that she filmed her original Facebook video in front of is itself now missing.)

One man who lives near Columbus Square says that he recently put out two Montgomery signs, which later went missing. “If they keep taking them, I’ll keep putting them up,” he said. 

Betts says he has nothing to do with the missing signs. In the video Chavers filmed in Betts’ office, Betts says that his campaign isn’t in a spot where it needs to resort to tearing down opponents’ signs.

“If you sit here long enough, a man is getting ready to come across the street from City Hall bringing me $500, today,” Betts says. “I’m getting that kind of support. I don’t need to tear down signs.”

Subscribe to Riverfront Times newsletters.Follow us: Apple News |  Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | Or sign up for our RSS Feed

[ad_2]

Source link

Continue Reading

Local News

St. Louis to Develop First Citywide Transportation Plan in Decades

Published

on

[ad_1]

The City of St. Louis is working to develop its first citywide mobility plan in decades, Mayor Tishaura Jones’ office announced Tuesday. This plan seeks to make it easier for everyone — drivers, pedestrians, bikers and public transit users — to safely commute within the city.

The plan will bring together other city projects like the Brickline Greenway, Future64, the MetroLink Green Line, and more, “while establishing new priorities for a safer, more efficient and better-maintained transportation network across the City,” according to the release. 

The key elements in the plan will be public engagement, the development of a safety action plan, future infrastructure priorities and transportation network mapping, according to Jones’ office.

The overarching goals are to create a vision for citywide mobility, plan a mixture of short and long-term mobility projects and to develop improved communication tools with the public to receive transportation updates. In recent years, both people who use public transit and cyclists have been outspoken about the difficulties — and dangers — of navigating St. Louis streets, citing both cuts to public transit and traffic violence.

To garner public input and participation for the plan, Jones’ office said there will be community meetings, focus groups and a survey for residents to share their concerns. The city will also be establishing a Community Advisory Committee. Those interested in learning more should check out at tmp-stl.com/

“Everyone deserves to feel safe when getting around St. Louis, whether they’re driving, biking, walking or taking public transit,” Jones said in a news release. “Creating a comprehensive transportation and mobility plan allows us to make intentional and strategic investments so that moving around St. Louis for jobs, education, and entertainment becomes easier, safer and more enjoyable.”

Subscribe to Riverfront Times newsletters.Follow us: Apple News |  Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | Or sign up for our RSS Feed

[ad_2]

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending