Connect with us

Politics

Progressives take control with big wins in St. Louis election

Published

on

[ad_1]


Tuesday was a banner night for St. Louis’ progressive political faction.That group of candidates, who are generally aligned with St. Louis Mayor Tishaura Jones, won a majority of seats on the Board of Aldermen. That provides a clearer path for both Jones and Board President Megan Green to chart out a policy agenda for a city flush with cash — and massive challenges.“I think tonight voters chose progressive candidates … and people that they know are going to lead our city into our next era,” Jones said.Jones and her allies will now be under more pressure to create policies that will make the city better. “When I was campaigning, I was often asked: ‘What’s the ability to get this done at the board?’” said Alderman-elect Michael Browning of the 9th Ward. “And I would tell them: ‘Well, there’s a whole slate of candidates that’s running with me.’ And a lot of those candidates were elected tonight. So I’m very optimistic.”

Brian Munoz

/

St. Louis Public RadioBoard President Megan Green speaks to Michael Browning, alderman-elect for the St. Louis Board of Alderman’s new 9th Ward, on Tuesday.

Can progressives make city government function better?St. Louis has struggled for years with a high violent crime rate as well as rampant poverty and disinvestment. And the city government has often scrambled to provide services like trash collection to residents.“It is a challenge delivering city services, we need to improve on that,” said Alderman Shane Cohn of the 3rd Ward. “We’ve had our challenges with staffing with equipment and things of that nature. But I think at the end of the day, you know, people want to see action from our city government.”With a new police chief and more money from the federal American Rescue Plan, Jones and her allies will be expected to deliver on efforts to improve life in the city. And if they don’t, some of the aldermen who will be up for election in 2025 could face tougher challenges than Tuesday.“And I think you could see those folks who have a two year term, who won by a thin majority or a thin margin, not necessarily run on a mandate platform,” said Alderman Tom Oldenburg of the 2nd Ward, who is not part of the progressive group. “And you’ll have to see more compromise. And you could see a new board in two years.”

Brian Munoz

/

St. Louis Public RadioAlderman Bret Narayan, right, who was elected to the St. Louis Board of Aldermen’s new 4th Ward on Tuesday, chuckles while talking to Tyler Merkel, of Maplewood at Dewey IS Elementary School in Hi-Pointe.

Can the progressive faction stick together?One of the challenges of defining factions in St. Louis politics is that participants often shift depending on the issue. Alderman Bret Narayan of the 4th Ward, for instance, noted he approaches legislation by “looking at each individual issue and representing my constituents on that issue.”“I try to stay away from the broad labels and try to look at each issue, talk to my neighborhood about it, talk to the ward as a whole about it and figure out how we should proceed on any given issue,” Narayan said.Oldenburg said he expects some tension to emerge among the candidates who had both Jones and Green’s support on Tuesday.“While I think that there is a majority of folks who would identify as progressive, the Black Caucus still remains very strong, and there’s still no love lost between the caucus and white progressives,” Oldenburg said. “So I do believe that there’s still going to be a heck of a lot of compromise that has to take place down at the Board of Aldermen.”Jones, whose victory in 2021 was largely thanks to an alliance between Black voters and white progressives, isn’t expecting uniformity on everything. But she is hoping the tone will be less adversarial than it was when Board President Lewis Reed was in office.“It fortunately helps when you have a number of people who are like minded and who also want to see the city win again,” Jones said. “I don’t expect us to agree on everything. But I do expect us to, to disagree privately, and not put it out as a show for everybody to see.”

Brian Munoz

/

St. Louis Public RadioDaniela Velazquez, who won in the St. Louis Board of Aldermen’s 6th Ward, speaks to supporters on Tuesday at Mann Elementary School in Tower Grove South.

How will the city handle major financial decisions?In addition to having lots of money from the American Rescue Plan and a settlement over the departure of the St. Louis Rams, Jones and her aldermanic allies will now have a new stream of revenue from a 3% tax on recreational marijuana which was approved Tuesday.“I anticipate that’s going to be hotly debated,” Narayan said of the marijuana money.Some newly-elected aldermen want to use the marijuana tax to shore up the St. Louis’ public health effort or pay city workers more. Alderwoman-elect Alisha Sonnier of the 7th Ward wants to examine whether the city uses the funds to right historical wrongs against Black people.“Being that we know that it was people of color and Black people that were disproportionately targeted by the war on drugs, I think that it should be something to explore what that looks like to invest into reparations and equity in our city,” Sonnier said. “I hope that we are willing to invest some of that money into real sustainable resources for the unhoused parts of our communities and for affordable housing. I would love to see some of that money go into expanding our universal basic income.”Others are looking farther into the future. Alderwoman-elect Daniela Velazquez of the 6th Ward also wants to make sure some of the money is saved so the city can deal with less bountiful financial times.“I’m a believer that we should use some of the surplus money from the Rams settlement for an endowment for the city to give us some kind of income on a long-term basis,” Velazquez said.

Brian Munoz

/

St. Louis Public RadioBoard of Alderman President Megan Green presides over a meeting of the board in January at City Hall in downtown St. Louis.

Will the city overhaul its charter?Voters narrowly passed an initiative setting up a charter commission every 10 years. It’s something that departing Alderwoman Annie Rice said was in a serious need of an upgrade for the city to operate properly.“Proposition C will give us a path to move forward both now and every 10 years into the future,” Rice said. “And that’s the momentum that the city of St. Louis needs.”Jones said she’s enthused about the charter commission, as it could excise some rather antiquated provisions.“Like people should be committed to an insane asylum or work off their debts at the Workhouse, or how every elected official is referred to in the charter as ‘he or him.’ And we know that’s not the case nowadays,” Jones said. “So I’m excited to see what kind of work our charter commission is going to do.”

Brian Munoz

/

St. Louis Public RadioAlderman Tom Oldenburg said that his colleagues, and likely city voters, should not require two elections if only two candidates file in a race.

Can turnout improve for city elections that don’t feature a mayoral contest?Because of St. Louis’ recently-enacted approval voting system, Tuesday’s elections were far more consequential than previous April contests. Before Proposition D passed several years ago, city voters for the most part decided aldermanic and citywide elections in the March Democratic primaries.Turnout was about 18 percent for this election, which is a bit higher than the March 2019 primary that featured a competitive race for Board of Aldermanic president. Considering Green was unopposed on Tuesday, turnout was not necessarily bad from a historical perspective.“We actually did see an uptick in participation in the cycle,” Cohn said.Some have suggested that citywide and aldermanic races could have more participation if they coincided with state-based primaries in August and November of even-numbered years.And there could be at least one change coming to how city elections are done. Oldenburg said there’s widespread momentum to only have one election when two candidates file for an aldermanic or citywide contest. Under the current guidelines, those two contenders have to run against each other twice — once in a primary and the other in the general.“And I think everyone agrees that needs to be fixed,” Oldenburg said. “Does it need to go back to the voters to get fixed? Probably.”

[ad_2]

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Poll: Support for Missouri abortion rights amendment growing

Published

on

[ad_1]


A proposed constitutional amendment legalizing abortion in Missouri received support from more than half of respondents in a new poll from St. Louis University and YouGov.That’s a boost from a poll earlier this year, which could mean what’s known as Amendment 3 is in a solid position to pass in November.SLU/YouGov’s poll of 900 likely Missouri voters from Aug. 8-16 found that 52% of respondents would vote for Amendment 3, which would place constitutional protections for abortion up to fetal viability. Thirty-four percent would vote against the measure, while 14% aren’t sure.By comparison, the SLU/YouGov poll from February found that 44% of voters would back the abortion legalization amendment.St. Louis University political science professor Steven Rogers said 32% of Republicans and 53% of independents would vote for the amendment. That’s in addition to nearly 80% of Democratic respondents who would approve the measure. In the previous poll, 24% of Republicans supported the amendment.Rogers noted that neither Amendment 3 nor a separate ballot item raising the state’s minimum wage is helping Democratic candidates. GOP contenders for U.S. Senate, governor, lieutenant governor, treasurer and secretary of state all hold comfortable leads.“We are seeing this kind of crossover voting, a little bit, where there are voters who are basically saying, ‘I am going to the polls and I’m going to support a Republican candidate, but I’m also going to go to the polls and then I’m also going to try to expand abortion access and then raise the minimum wage,’” Rogers said.Republican gubernatorial nominee Mike Kehoe has a 51%-41% lead over Democrat Crystal Quade. And U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley is leading Democrat Lucas Kunce by 53% to 42%. Some GOP candidates for attorney general, secretary of state and treasurer have even larger leads over their Democratic rivals.

Brian Munoz

/

St. Louis Public RadioHundreds of demonstrators pack into a parking lot at Planned Parenthood of St. Louis and Southwest Missouri on June 24, 2022, during a demonstration following the Supreme Court’s reversal of a case that guaranteed the constitutional right to an abortion.

One of the biggest challenges for foes of Amendment 3 could be financial.Typically, Missouri ballot initiatives with well-funded and well-organized campaigns have a better chance of passing — especially if the opposition is underfunded and disorganized. Since the end of July, the campaign committee formed to pass Amendment 3 received more than $3 million in donations of $5,000 or more.That money could be used for television advertisements to improve the proposal’s standing further, Rogers said, as well as point out that Missouri’s current abortion ban doesn’t allow the procedure in the case of rape or incest.“Meanwhile, the anti side won’t have those resources to kind of try to make that counter argument as strongly, and they don’t have public opinion as strongly on their side,” Rogers said.There is precedent of a well-funded initiative almost failing due to opposition from socially conservative voters.In 2006, a measure providing constitutional protections for embryonic stem cell research nearly failed — even though a campaign committee aimed at passing it had a commanding financial advantage.Former state Sen. Bob Onder was part of the opposition campaign to that measure. He said earlier this month it is possible to create a similar dynamic in 2024 against Amendment 3, if social conservatives who oppose abortion rights can band together.“This is not about reproductive rights or care for miscarriages or IVF or anything else,” said Onder, the GOP nominee for Missouri’s 3rd Congressional District seat. “Missourians will learn that out-of-state special interests and dark money from out of state is lying to them and they will reject this amendment.”Quade said earlier this month that Missourians of all political ideologies are ready to roll back the state’s abortion ban.“Regardless of political party, we hear from folks who are tired of politicians being in their doctor’s offices,” Quade said. “They want politicians to mind their own business. So this is going to excite folks all across the political spectrum.”

[ad_2]

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Democrat Mark Osmack makes his case for Missouri treasurer

Published

on

[ad_1]


Mark Osmack has been out of the electoral fray for awhile, but he never completely abandoned his passion for Missouri politics.Osmack, a Valley Park native and U.S. Army veteran, previously ran for Missouri’s 2nd Congressional District seat and for state Senate. Now he’s the Democratic nominee for state treasurer after receiving a phone call from Missouri Democratic Party Chairman Russ Carnahan asking him to run.“There’s a lot of decision making and processing and evaluation that goes into it, which is something I am very passionate and interested in,” Osmack said this week on an episode of Politically Speaking.Osmack is squaring off against state Treasurer Vivek Malek, who was able to easily win a crowded GOP primary against several veteran lawmakers including House Budget Chairman Cody Smith and state Sen. Andrew Koenig.While Malek was able to attract big donations to his political action committee and pour his own money into the campaign, Osmack isn’t worried that he won’t be able to compete in November. Since Malek was appointed to his post, Osmack contends he hasn’t proven that he’s a formidable opponent in a general election.“His actions and his decision making so far in his roughly two year tenure in that office have been questionable,” Osmack said.Among other things, Osmack was critical of Malek for placing unclaimed property notices on video gaming machines which are usually found in gas stations or convenience stores. The legality of the machines has been questioned for some time.As Malek explained on his own episode of Politically Speaking, he wanted to make sure the unclaimed property program was as widely advertised as possible. But he acknowledged it was a mistake to put the decals close to the machines and ultimately decided to remove them.Osmack said: “This doesn’t even pass the common sense sniff test of, ‘Hey, should I put state stickers claiming you might have a billion dollars on a gambling machine that is not registered with the state of Missouri?’ If we’re gonna give kudos for him acknowledging the wrong thing, it never should have been done in the first place.”Osmack’s platform includes supporting programs providing school meals using Missouri agriculture products and making child care more accessible for the working class.He said the fact that Missouri has such a large surplus shows that it’s possible to create programs to make child care within reach for parents.“It is quite audacious for [Republicans] to brag about $8 billion, with a B, dollars in state surplus, while we offer next to no social services to include pre-K, daycare, or child care,” Osmack said.Here’s are some other topics Osmack discussed on the show:How he would handle managing the state’s pension systems and approving low-income housing tax credits. The state treasurer’s office is on boards overseeing both of those programs.Malek’s decision to cut off investments from Chinese companies. Osmack said that Missouri needs to be cautious about abandoning China as a business partner, especially since they’re a major consumer of the state’s agriculture products. “There’s a way to make this work where we are not supporting communist nations to the detriment of the United States or our allies, while also maintaining strong economic ties that benefit Missouri farmers,” he said.What it was like to witness the skirmish at the Missouri State Fair between U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley and Democratic challenger Lucas Kunce.Whether Kunce can get the support of influential groups like the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, which often channels money and staff to states with competitive Senate elections.

[ad_2]

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

As Illinois receives praise for its cannabis equity efforts, stakeholders work on system’s flaws

Published

on

[ad_1]


Medical marijuana patients can now purchase cannabis grown by small businesses as part of their allotment, Illinois’ top cannabis regulator said, but smaller, newly licensed cannabis growers are still seeking greater access to the state’s medical marijuana customers.Illinois legalized medicinal marijuana beginning in 2014, then legalized it for recreational use in 2020. While the 2020 law legalized cannabis use for any adult age 21 or older, it did not expand licensing for medical dispensaries.Patients can purchase marijuana as part of the medical cannabis program at dual-purpose dispensaries, which are licensed to serve both medical and recreational customers. But dual-purpose dispensaries are greatly outnumbered by dispensaries only licensed to sell recreationally, and there are no medical-only dispensaries in the state.As another part of the adult-use legalization law, lawmakers created a “craft grow” license category that was designed to give more opportunities to Illinoisans hoping to legally grow and sell marijuana. The smaller-scale grow operations were part of the 2020 law’s efforts to diversify the cannabis industry in Illinois.Prior to that, all cultivation centers in Illinois were large-scale operations dominated by large multi-state operators. The existing cultivators, mostly in operation since 2014, were allowed to grow recreational cannabis beginning in 2019.Until recently, dual-purpose dispensaries have been unsure as to whether craft-grown products, made by social equity licensees — those who have lived in a disproportionately impacted area or have been historically impacted by the war on drugs — can be sold medicinally as part of a patient’s medical allotment.Erin Johnson, the state’s cannabis regulation oversight officer, told Capitol News Illinois last month that her office has “been telling dispensaries, as they have been asking us” they can now sell craft-grown products to medical patients.“There was just a track and trace issue on our end, but never anything statutorily,” she said.

Dilpreet Raju

/

Capitol News IllinoisThe graphic shows how cannabis grown in Illinois gets from cultivation centers to customers.

No notice has been posted, but Johnson’s verbal guidance comes almost two years after the first craft grow business went online in Illinois.It allows roughly 150,000 medical patients, who dispensary owners say are the most consistent purchasers of marijuana, to buy products made by social equity businesses without paying recreational taxes. However — even as more dispensaries open — the number available to medical patients has not increased since 2018, something the Cannabis Regulation Oversight Office “desperately” wants to see changed. Johnson said Illinois is a limited license state, meaning “there are caps on everything” to help control the relatively new market.Berwyn Thompkins, who operates two cannabis businesses, said the rules limited options for patients and small businesses.“It’s about access,” Thompkins said. “Why wouldn’t we want all the patients — which the (adult-use) program was initially built around — why wouldn’t we want them to have access? They should have access to any dispensary.”Customers with a medical marijuana card pay a 1% tax on all marijuana products, whereas recreational customers pay retail taxes between roughly 20 and 40% on a given cannabis product, when accounting for local taxes.While Illinois has received praise for its equity-focused cannabis law, including through an independent study that showed more people of color own cannabis licenses than in any other state, some industry operators say they’ve experienced many unnecessary hurdles getting their businesses up and running.The state, in fact, announced last month that it had opened its 100th social equity dispensary.But Steve Olson, purchasing manager at a pair of dispensaries (including one dual-purpose dispensary) near Rockford, said small specialty license holders have been left in the lurch since the first craft grower opened in October 2022.“You would think that this would be something they’re (the government) trying to help out these social equity companies with, but they’re putting handcuffs on them in so many different spots,” he said. “One of them being this medical thing.”Olson said he contacted state agencies, including the Department of Financial and Professional Regulation, months ago about whether craft products can be sold to medical patients at their retail tax rate, but only heard one response: “They all say it was an oversight.”This potentially hurt social equity companies because they sell wholesale to dispensaries and may have been missing out on a consistent customer base through those medical dispensaries.Olson said the state’s attempts to provide licensees with a path to a successful business over the years, such as with corrective lotteries that granted more social equity licenses, have come up short.“It’s like they almost set up the social equity thing to fail so the big guys could come in and swoop up all these licenses,” Olson said. “I hate to feel like that but, if you look at it, it’s pretty black and white.”Olson said craft companies benefit from any type of retail sale.“If we sell it to medical patients or not, it’s a matter of, ‘Are we collecting the proper taxes?’ That’s all it is,” he said.State revenue from cannabis taxes, licensing costs and other fees goes into the Cannabis Regulation Fund, which is used to fund a host of programs, including cannabis offense expungement, the general revenue fund, and the R3 campaign aiming to uplift disinvested communities.For fiscal year 2024, nearly $256 million was paid out from Cannabis Regulation Fund for related initiatives, which includes almost $89 million transferred to the state’s general revenue fund and more than $20 million distributed to local governments, according to the Illinois Department of Revenue.Medical access still limitedThe state’s 55 medical dispensaries that predate the 2020 legalization law, mostly owned by publicly traded multistate operators that had been operating in Illinois since 2014 under the state’s medical marijuana program, were automatically granted a right to licenses to sell recreationally in January 2020. That gave them a dual-purpose license that no new entrants into the market can receive under current law.Since expanding their clientele in 2020, Illinois dispensaries have sold more than $6 billion worth of cannabis products through recreational transactions alone.Nearly two-thirds of dispensaries licensed to sell to medical patients are in the northeast counties of Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake and Will. Dual-purpose dispensaries only represent about 20 percent of the state’s dispensaries.While the state began offering recreational dispensary licenses since the adult-use legalization law passed, it has not granted a new medical dispensary license since 2018. That has allowed the established players to continue to corner the market on the state’s nearly 150,000 medical marijuana patients.But social equity licensees and advocates say there are more ways to level the playing field, including expanding access to medical sales.Johnson, who became the state’s top cannabis regulator in late 2022, expressed hope for movement during the fall veto session on House Bill 2911, which would expand medical access to all Illinois dispensaries.“We would like every single dispensary in Illinois to be able to serve medical patients,” Johnson said. “It’s something that medical patients have been asking for, for years.”Johnson said the bill would benefit patients and small businesses.“It’s something we desperately want to happen as a state system, because we want to make sure that medical patients are able to easily access what they need,” she said. “We also think it’s good for our social equity dispensaries, as they’re opening, to be able to serve medical patients.”Rep. Bob Morgan, D-Deerfield, who was the first statewide project coordinator for Illinois’ medical cannabis program prior to joining the legislature, wrote in an email to Capitol News Illinois that the state needs to be doing more for its patients.“Illinois is failing the state’s 150,000 medical cannabis patients with debilitating conditions. Too many are still denied the patient protections they deserve, including access to their medicine,” Morgan wrote, adding he would continue to work with stakeholders on further legislation.Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news service covering state government. It is distributed to hundreds of newspapers, radio and TV stations statewide. It is funded primarily by the Illinois Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation, along with major contributions from the Illinois Broadcasters Foundation and Southern Illinois Editorial Association.

[ad_2]

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending