Connect with us

Politics

New Athens man goes after officials who block him on Facebook

Published

on

[ad_1]


Editor’s note: This story was originally published in the Belleville News-Democrat.Gene Triefenbach is a local activist known for using strong terms to voice his opinion, whether promoting marijuana legalization or objecting to increased water and sewer rates.Now the New Athens man is taking aim at officials who try to block him or remove his posts from government Facebook pages.“If you are (a government page administrator), you can say in the next comment, ‘This man is wrong,’ but you can’t say, ‘I am going to stifle you,’” Triefenbach said. “And that’s what they’ve done, and that’s what they feel comfortable doing.”Triefenbach was speaking of New Athens Mayor Joe Behnken, who administered a community Facebook page that is no longer active; and page administrators for Village of Marissa Emergency Management Agency, Illinois Sen. Christopher Belt (D-Swansea) and New Athens Fire Co. #1.Triefenbach was blocked and had comments removed from all four pages before he was reinstated.“They violated my right to free speech,” he said.In the New Athens case, Mayor Behnken maintained that Triefenbach broke the page’s rule against “foul and abusive language.” The village’s insurance company later paid him a $30,000 settlement to keep it out of court.Triefenbach is still in talks with two of the other government entities that blocked him on Facebook.Limited leewayVirginia’s Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in 2019 that the interactive portion of a government official’s Facebook page is a “public forum,” and people can’t be blocked for posting their opinions.Subsequent cases have “refined” the law to allow officials to remove comments or block people under specific circumstances, according to Ed Yohnka, spokesman for the ACLU of Illinois.“A public entity can block all comments if that’s what they want to do,” he said. “Alternately, they can block some comments if the reason for blocking them is clear, consistent rules that are applied to everyone.”Yohnka gave the example of rules against profanity or personal attacks that are unfounded or unwarranted.“What you can’t do is selectively block comments simply because you don’t like what the person says or it doesn’t agree with the majority opinion,” Yohnka said. “That is not allowed (by government officials).”This is in contrast to citizens who don’t hold public office. They can remove comments from their pages or unfriend people for any reason or no reason, according to Facebook.COVID disagreementTriefenbach is a retiree who formerly worked as a lobbyist and car salesman, sold marijuana and volunteered with the ACLU of Eastern Missouri. The Marissa native moved to New Athens two years ago.During the COVID-19 pandemic, Triefenbach criticized New Athens officials for allegedly allowing local bars and restaurants to continue operating, despite a temporary state ban.Triefenbach posted comments on a public Facebook page called New Athens Concerned Citizens, which wasn’t an “official” village page, but it was administered by Mayor Behnken.“It was the defacto communication tool for the village of New Athens,” Triefenbach said. “If there was a boil order, storm warning, announcement of whether the Village Hall was open or closed, all that was posted on this page.”One of Triefenbach’s posts in 2020 included a reference to a man “pissing off the porch” of a bar across the street from his house, according to Behnken, who removed the comment and blocked him from the page.“It’s not about what I feel is right,” the mayor said last week. “It’s what is appropriate for a Facebook page that has decorum and civility.”Behnken said he also blocked 49 other people for breaking the rule against foul and abusive language. Triefenbach alleges that many were blocked for trying to advertise a Black Lives Matter rally.Triefenbach’s attorney, Patrick Sullivan, of Belleville, notified the village that his client was contemplating a lawsuit and maintained his civil rights had been violated. Behnken turned the case over to the village’s insurance company, which paid the $30,000 settlement.Several New Athens residents demanded that Behnken resign, saying he wasted taxpayer money, according to minutes of the Village Board meeting on Dec. 20, 2021.This week, the mayor said the settlement didn’t cost the village any money and it wasn’t an admission of guilt.“The insurance companies recognize the fact that threats on constitutional grounds are exceedingly expensive to defend, and what they do is weigh the (settlement) costs against going to court,” he said. “Furthermore, I believe they feel that federal judges are not happy having their dockets crowded by malicious, nuisance lawsuits.”None of the other 49 people blocked from the Facebook page took legal action against the village, according to Behnken.The mayor turned the New Athens Concerned Citizens page over to another administrator, who later deactivated it. A private page called New Athens Community essentially replaced it.There are now three other community Facebook pages, including New Athens EXTREMELY Concerned Citizens, New Athens Community Building and New Athens Concerned Citizens That Aren’t Racist.Landfill commentTriefenbach has long argued that a Marissa landfill has caused cancer among village residents. He referred to that issue in a 2021 comment that was posted in reaction to a storm warning on the Village of Marissa Emergency Management Agency Facebook page.“I pointed out to them, ‘Hey, nobody’s ever died in Marissa because of a storm, but everybody in my block, where my house was in Marissa before I sold it, every house has had somebody with cancer, and three of them on the block has had somebody die,’” Triefenbach said.The comment was removed, and Triefenbach was blocked from the page. He was later reinstated after talking to Mayor Chad Easton, who wasn’t the administrator who blocked him.Last week, Easton said he couldn’t comment on the specific case because Triefenbach’s attorney had approached officials about possible litigation, but he agreed to speak in general terms on the issue of public access to village Facebook pages.“My position is that everybody is entitled to free speech and being able to post on government media sites without persecution or retribution,” the mayor said.Post on pain killersTriefenbach has posted several comments on Sen. Belt’s Facebook page, demanding action on what he sees as a problem with doctors refusing to prescribe pain medication for fear of legal jeopardy related to the opioid crisis. He also has communicated with staffers by phone and private message.Triefenbach said his wife, Christine Meggs, suffers from excruciating pain caused by cancer surgery.“I told Christopher Belt, and he blocked me for it (in March), and he took my message down that no one should have to watch their loved one die screaming in pain,” Triefenbach said. “It’s bad enough watching them die, period.”Triefenbach was reinstated on Belt’s Facebook page last week.Triefenbach said he personally knows of New Athens-area residents who have begun taking illegal and dangerous “fake” drugs to treat pain because of their inability to get prescriptions.“It’s got to stop, and it’s got to stop right away,” he said. “This isn’t a dress rehearsal. When people are dead, they’re dead.”Triefenbach said he’s weighing his legal options after being blocked on Belt’s Facebook page, but his main goal is getting legislation passed to give doctors in Illinois more protection when they prescribe pain medication.Belt employee Brandy Renfro responded by email to a BND request for a phone interview with the senator or staff member last week, stating that no one was available to comment on Triefenbach’s case.“The individual you inquired about is not blocked from the Senator’s page,” she wrote.Triefenbach said New Athens Fire Co. #1 blocked him from its Facebook page several years ago after he posted a comment questioning why residents weren’t allowed to walk their dogs on the village’s levy during a flood, given that officials claimed the levy was safe.According to Triefenbach, he took no legal action because the fire chief reinstated him the same day.Teri Maddox is a reporter and editor with the Belleville News-Democrat, a news partner of St. Louis Public Radio.

[ad_2]

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Poll: Support for Missouri abortion rights amendment growing

Published

on

[ad_1]


A proposed constitutional amendment legalizing abortion in Missouri received support from more than half of respondents in a new poll from St. Louis University and YouGov.That’s a boost from a poll earlier this year, which could mean what’s known as Amendment 3 is in a solid position to pass in November.SLU/YouGov’s poll of 900 likely Missouri voters from Aug. 8-16 found that 52% of respondents would vote for Amendment 3, which would place constitutional protections for abortion up to fetal viability. Thirty-four percent would vote against the measure, while 14% aren’t sure.By comparison, the SLU/YouGov poll from February found that 44% of voters would back the abortion legalization amendment.St. Louis University political science professor Steven Rogers said 32% of Republicans and 53% of independents would vote for the amendment. That’s in addition to nearly 80% of Democratic respondents who would approve the measure. In the previous poll, 24% of Republicans supported the amendment.Rogers noted that neither Amendment 3 nor a separate ballot item raising the state’s minimum wage is helping Democratic candidates. GOP contenders for U.S. Senate, governor, lieutenant governor, treasurer and secretary of state all hold comfortable leads.“We are seeing this kind of crossover voting, a little bit, where there are voters who are basically saying, ‘I am going to the polls and I’m going to support a Republican candidate, but I’m also going to go to the polls and then I’m also going to try to expand abortion access and then raise the minimum wage,’” Rogers said.Republican gubernatorial nominee Mike Kehoe has a 51%-41% lead over Democrat Crystal Quade. And U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley is leading Democrat Lucas Kunce by 53% to 42%. Some GOP candidates for attorney general, secretary of state and treasurer have even larger leads over their Democratic rivals.

Brian Munoz

/

St. Louis Public RadioHundreds of demonstrators pack into a parking lot at Planned Parenthood of St. Louis and Southwest Missouri on June 24, 2022, during a demonstration following the Supreme Court’s reversal of a case that guaranteed the constitutional right to an abortion.

One of the biggest challenges for foes of Amendment 3 could be financial.Typically, Missouri ballot initiatives with well-funded and well-organized campaigns have a better chance of passing — especially if the opposition is underfunded and disorganized. Since the end of July, the campaign committee formed to pass Amendment 3 received more than $3 million in donations of $5,000 or more.That money could be used for television advertisements to improve the proposal’s standing further, Rogers said, as well as point out that Missouri’s current abortion ban doesn’t allow the procedure in the case of rape or incest.“Meanwhile, the anti side won’t have those resources to kind of try to make that counter argument as strongly, and they don’t have public opinion as strongly on their side,” Rogers said.There is precedent of a well-funded initiative almost failing due to opposition from socially conservative voters.In 2006, a measure providing constitutional protections for embryonic stem cell research nearly failed — even though a campaign committee aimed at passing it had a commanding financial advantage.Former state Sen. Bob Onder was part of the opposition campaign to that measure. He said earlier this month it is possible to create a similar dynamic in 2024 against Amendment 3, if social conservatives who oppose abortion rights can band together.“This is not about reproductive rights or care for miscarriages or IVF or anything else,” said Onder, the GOP nominee for Missouri’s 3rd Congressional District seat. “Missourians will learn that out-of-state special interests and dark money from out of state is lying to them and they will reject this amendment.”Quade said earlier this month that Missourians of all political ideologies are ready to roll back the state’s abortion ban.“Regardless of political party, we hear from folks who are tired of politicians being in their doctor’s offices,” Quade said. “They want politicians to mind their own business. So this is going to excite folks all across the political spectrum.”

[ad_2]

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Democrat Mark Osmack makes his case for Missouri treasurer

Published

on

[ad_1]


Mark Osmack has been out of the electoral fray for awhile, but he never completely abandoned his passion for Missouri politics.Osmack, a Valley Park native and U.S. Army veteran, previously ran for Missouri’s 2nd Congressional District seat and for state Senate. Now he’s the Democratic nominee for state treasurer after receiving a phone call from Missouri Democratic Party Chairman Russ Carnahan asking him to run.“There’s a lot of decision making and processing and evaluation that goes into it, which is something I am very passionate and interested in,” Osmack said this week on an episode of Politically Speaking.Osmack is squaring off against state Treasurer Vivek Malek, who was able to easily win a crowded GOP primary against several veteran lawmakers including House Budget Chairman Cody Smith and state Sen. Andrew Koenig.While Malek was able to attract big donations to his political action committee and pour his own money into the campaign, Osmack isn’t worried that he won’t be able to compete in November. Since Malek was appointed to his post, Osmack contends he hasn’t proven that he’s a formidable opponent in a general election.“His actions and his decision making so far in his roughly two year tenure in that office have been questionable,” Osmack said.Among other things, Osmack was critical of Malek for placing unclaimed property notices on video gaming machines which are usually found in gas stations or convenience stores. The legality of the machines has been questioned for some time.As Malek explained on his own episode of Politically Speaking, he wanted to make sure the unclaimed property program was as widely advertised as possible. But he acknowledged it was a mistake to put the decals close to the machines and ultimately decided to remove them.Osmack said: “This doesn’t even pass the common sense sniff test of, ‘Hey, should I put state stickers claiming you might have a billion dollars on a gambling machine that is not registered with the state of Missouri?’ If we’re gonna give kudos for him acknowledging the wrong thing, it never should have been done in the first place.”Osmack’s platform includes supporting programs providing school meals using Missouri agriculture products and making child care more accessible for the working class.He said the fact that Missouri has such a large surplus shows that it’s possible to create programs to make child care within reach for parents.“It is quite audacious for [Republicans] to brag about $8 billion, with a B, dollars in state surplus, while we offer next to no social services to include pre-K, daycare, or child care,” Osmack said.Here’s are some other topics Osmack discussed on the show:How he would handle managing the state’s pension systems and approving low-income housing tax credits. The state treasurer’s office is on boards overseeing both of those programs.Malek’s decision to cut off investments from Chinese companies. Osmack said that Missouri needs to be cautious about abandoning China as a business partner, especially since they’re a major consumer of the state’s agriculture products. “There’s a way to make this work where we are not supporting communist nations to the detriment of the United States or our allies, while also maintaining strong economic ties that benefit Missouri farmers,” he said.What it was like to witness the skirmish at the Missouri State Fair between U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley and Democratic challenger Lucas Kunce.Whether Kunce can get the support of influential groups like the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, which often channels money and staff to states with competitive Senate elections.

[ad_2]

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

As Illinois receives praise for its cannabis equity efforts, stakeholders work on system’s flaws

Published

on

[ad_1]


Medical marijuana patients can now purchase cannabis grown by small businesses as part of their allotment, Illinois’ top cannabis regulator said, but smaller, newly licensed cannabis growers are still seeking greater access to the state’s medical marijuana customers.Illinois legalized medicinal marijuana beginning in 2014, then legalized it for recreational use in 2020. While the 2020 law legalized cannabis use for any adult age 21 or older, it did not expand licensing for medical dispensaries.Patients can purchase marijuana as part of the medical cannabis program at dual-purpose dispensaries, which are licensed to serve both medical and recreational customers. But dual-purpose dispensaries are greatly outnumbered by dispensaries only licensed to sell recreationally, and there are no medical-only dispensaries in the state.As another part of the adult-use legalization law, lawmakers created a “craft grow” license category that was designed to give more opportunities to Illinoisans hoping to legally grow and sell marijuana. The smaller-scale grow operations were part of the 2020 law’s efforts to diversify the cannabis industry in Illinois.Prior to that, all cultivation centers in Illinois were large-scale operations dominated by large multi-state operators. The existing cultivators, mostly in operation since 2014, were allowed to grow recreational cannabis beginning in 2019.Until recently, dual-purpose dispensaries have been unsure as to whether craft-grown products, made by social equity licensees — those who have lived in a disproportionately impacted area or have been historically impacted by the war on drugs — can be sold medicinally as part of a patient’s medical allotment.Erin Johnson, the state’s cannabis regulation oversight officer, told Capitol News Illinois last month that her office has “been telling dispensaries, as they have been asking us” they can now sell craft-grown products to medical patients.“There was just a track and trace issue on our end, but never anything statutorily,” she said.

Dilpreet Raju

/

Capitol News IllinoisThe graphic shows how cannabis grown in Illinois gets from cultivation centers to customers.

No notice has been posted, but Johnson’s verbal guidance comes almost two years after the first craft grow business went online in Illinois.It allows roughly 150,000 medical patients, who dispensary owners say are the most consistent purchasers of marijuana, to buy products made by social equity businesses without paying recreational taxes. However — even as more dispensaries open — the number available to medical patients has not increased since 2018, something the Cannabis Regulation Oversight Office “desperately” wants to see changed. Johnson said Illinois is a limited license state, meaning “there are caps on everything” to help control the relatively new market.Berwyn Thompkins, who operates two cannabis businesses, said the rules limited options for patients and small businesses.“It’s about access,” Thompkins said. “Why wouldn’t we want all the patients — which the (adult-use) program was initially built around — why wouldn’t we want them to have access? They should have access to any dispensary.”Customers with a medical marijuana card pay a 1% tax on all marijuana products, whereas recreational customers pay retail taxes between roughly 20 and 40% on a given cannabis product, when accounting for local taxes.While Illinois has received praise for its equity-focused cannabis law, including through an independent study that showed more people of color own cannabis licenses than in any other state, some industry operators say they’ve experienced many unnecessary hurdles getting their businesses up and running.The state, in fact, announced last month that it had opened its 100th social equity dispensary.But Steve Olson, purchasing manager at a pair of dispensaries (including one dual-purpose dispensary) near Rockford, said small specialty license holders have been left in the lurch since the first craft grower opened in October 2022.“You would think that this would be something they’re (the government) trying to help out these social equity companies with, but they’re putting handcuffs on them in so many different spots,” he said. “One of them being this medical thing.”Olson said he contacted state agencies, including the Department of Financial and Professional Regulation, months ago about whether craft products can be sold to medical patients at their retail tax rate, but only heard one response: “They all say it was an oversight.”This potentially hurt social equity companies because they sell wholesale to dispensaries and may have been missing out on a consistent customer base through those medical dispensaries.Olson said the state’s attempts to provide licensees with a path to a successful business over the years, such as with corrective lotteries that granted more social equity licenses, have come up short.“It’s like they almost set up the social equity thing to fail so the big guys could come in and swoop up all these licenses,” Olson said. “I hate to feel like that but, if you look at it, it’s pretty black and white.”Olson said craft companies benefit from any type of retail sale.“If we sell it to medical patients or not, it’s a matter of, ‘Are we collecting the proper taxes?’ That’s all it is,” he said.State revenue from cannabis taxes, licensing costs and other fees goes into the Cannabis Regulation Fund, which is used to fund a host of programs, including cannabis offense expungement, the general revenue fund, and the R3 campaign aiming to uplift disinvested communities.For fiscal year 2024, nearly $256 million was paid out from Cannabis Regulation Fund for related initiatives, which includes almost $89 million transferred to the state’s general revenue fund and more than $20 million distributed to local governments, according to the Illinois Department of Revenue.Medical access still limitedThe state’s 55 medical dispensaries that predate the 2020 legalization law, mostly owned by publicly traded multistate operators that had been operating in Illinois since 2014 under the state’s medical marijuana program, were automatically granted a right to licenses to sell recreationally in January 2020. That gave them a dual-purpose license that no new entrants into the market can receive under current law.Since expanding their clientele in 2020, Illinois dispensaries have sold more than $6 billion worth of cannabis products through recreational transactions alone.Nearly two-thirds of dispensaries licensed to sell to medical patients are in the northeast counties of Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake and Will. Dual-purpose dispensaries only represent about 20 percent of the state’s dispensaries.While the state began offering recreational dispensary licenses since the adult-use legalization law passed, it has not granted a new medical dispensary license since 2018. That has allowed the established players to continue to corner the market on the state’s nearly 150,000 medical marijuana patients.But social equity licensees and advocates say there are more ways to level the playing field, including expanding access to medical sales.Johnson, who became the state’s top cannabis regulator in late 2022, expressed hope for movement during the fall veto session on House Bill 2911, which would expand medical access to all Illinois dispensaries.“We would like every single dispensary in Illinois to be able to serve medical patients,” Johnson said. “It’s something that medical patients have been asking for, for years.”Johnson said the bill would benefit patients and small businesses.“It’s something we desperately want to happen as a state system, because we want to make sure that medical patients are able to easily access what they need,” she said. “We also think it’s good for our social equity dispensaries, as they’re opening, to be able to serve medical patients.”Rep. Bob Morgan, D-Deerfield, who was the first statewide project coordinator for Illinois’ medical cannabis program prior to joining the legislature, wrote in an email to Capitol News Illinois that the state needs to be doing more for its patients.“Illinois is failing the state’s 150,000 medical cannabis patients with debilitating conditions. Too many are still denied the patient protections they deserve, including access to their medicine,” Morgan wrote, adding he would continue to work with stakeholders on further legislation.Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news service covering state government. It is distributed to hundreds of newspapers, radio and TV stations statewide. It is funded primarily by the Illinois Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation, along with major contributions from the Illinois Broadcasters Foundation and Southern Illinois Editorial Association.

[ad_2]

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending