Politics
Missouri legislature facing contentious issues as it resumes
[ad_1]
Bills restricting foreign ownership of Missouri farmland and establishing an open enrollment program for public schools, as well as a resolution that would make the state’s constitution harder to amend, are just some of the measures that the House passed before lawmakers left for a weeklong break.The Senate also has passed legislation, including a multifaceted education bill to establish greater transparency requirements for schools and ban the teaching of certain concepts that often have been cast under the umbrella term of critical race theory.However, for any of these bills to reach Gov. Mike Parson’s desk, they must pass both chambers. And while the legislature has run so far without major breakdowns, ideological disagreements on bills such as those targeting transgender rights and taking control of the St. Louis police department and circuit attorney’s office could obstruct productivity.For Senate Minority Leader John Rizzo, D-Independence, the reason the Senate has run well up to this point has to do with how some members have been treated.“I do believe it was functioning, because they kept giving the conservative caucus guys what they wanted, right? They were paying a ransom every day to keep the Senate functioning,” Rizzo said.Before this session began, the conservative caucus, which routinely held up legislation last year, announced its disbandment, with its members saying they hoped to unite under a single majority Republican caucus.Sen. Bill Eigel, R-Weldon Spring, who was part of the former caucus, said the current strategy has not led to the results those members had hoped for.“You have to wonder if the more diplomatic approach that the conservatives took in the first half didn’t ultimately lead to any policy successes, well, then we might have to change tactics as we head into it back in Jefferson City,” Eigel said.Eigel disagreed with the notion that the caucus has been catered to, saying many of its priorities have not passed the Senate yet, like changes to the initiative ballot petition process and personal property tax cuts.“I’m looking at what the stated priorities of the Republican caucus were coming into this year, none of them have yet been accomplished. So, I think there’s a lot of pressure as we move into the second half,” Eigel said.Senators left for spring break a day early after they were unable to move forward on legislation that would bar transgender minors from receiving gender-affirming health care. That bill is expected to be debated this week.Since adjournment, members of the former caucus, as well as some new senators, put out a statement condemning a lack of action and have taken to social media to express their discontent.Senate floor leader Cindy O’Laughlin, R-Shelbina, said she does not intend to force an end to Democratic filibustering on the bill, despite calls from some senators to do so.“People don’t have to agree with me, they don’t have to vote with me, they don’t even have to like me,” O’Laughlin said. “But I think they do have to respect the position in the fact that the caucus put me in this position. And so I’m not going to let individual senators tell me how to run the floor.”O’Laughlin said she does ultimately expect the Senate to pass the ban on transition health care for minors.“The Democrats understand that on this particular issue, while maybe they don’t agree with basically what our entire caucus believes, they understand that we are going to pass the bill, whatever the final form of that is,” O’Laughlin said.Medicaid expansion for new mothersIn the original version of the bipartisan-backed Senate bill, new moms who receive care through MO HealthNet or the Show-Me Healthy Babies program would be able to keep that coverage for a full year after giving birth. Currently, that coverage only lasts for 60 days postpartum.However, the bill went through several changes before it passed the Senate, including provisions that some say could prevent the program from gaining federal approval.One of the changes made includes a stipulation that the bill cannot move forward until the number of ineligible Medicaid participants removed from the program exceeds the number of people projected to enroll in the new program — around 5,000. Another change involves a provision that would bar people who had an abortion from using the program.Eigel was the architect of some of those changes and said he believed they made the legislation a Medicaid reform bill as opposed to a Medicaid expansion bill.Rep. LaKeySha Bosley, D-St. Louis, who has her own version of the bill, said she is hopeful that the legislature will be able to pass a version without those Senate additions.“If there’s anything else added to it, we’re going to lose our federal standing. … And we’ll continue to lose lives,” Bosley said.Additionally, House floor leader Jon Patterson, R-Lee’s Summit, expressed reservations over the Senate modifications.“It would be my preference that we have something that’s clean, that would not put us out of compliance,” Patterson said.But even if the House does pass a version of the bill, Rizzo pointed out it has to go back to the Senate.“Let’s say they strip away the poison pill that the conservative caucus put in it, it’s got to go back to the floor. And when it goes back to the floor, when you take the thing away that they wanted, there’s going to be a problem,” Rizzo said.Passing the annual budgetParson outlined record state spending because of a massive surplus during his annual State of the State address. Many of his proposals, such as widening portions of Interstate 70, received bipartisan support.Now, months later, the first draft of the budget could be out as early as this week.Rep. Deb. Lavender, D-Manchester, who serves on the budget committee, thinks there will be a difference between what Parson wants the budget to look like and the amount of spending House Budget Chair Rep. Cody Smith, R-Carthage, is willing to approve.Lavender said some of the biggest changes could come in education spending.“I think we’re gonna see some of that in community support for our schools,” Lavender said, “not just the foundation formula, but money then for pre-K, money for child care.”Patterson said he expects Smith to produce a budget that’s “fiscally conservative but leaves areas where we can work with the governor on his proposal.”However, House Minority Leader Crystal Quade, D-Springfield, expects to see a difference between the House’s budget under Smith and the Senate’s budget under Appropriations Chair Sen. Lincoln Hough, R-Springfield.“We have in the House a conservative member in charge of the budget, who only wants to cut spending, that’s what he’s trained to do. And so now we’re in a situation where we have excess money that needs to be spent,” Quade said.Last year, Eigel and other members of the conservative caucus criticized the amount of spending in the budget. He said that this year’s budget, with many of Parson’s proposals receiving support across the aisle, is also concerning.“I think we’ve got a big problem. And right now, there doesn’t seem to be any fiscal restraint from any source of leadership in the legislature or the governor’s office,” Eigel said.Another area of spending is around child care. Discussion on what that looks like could ramp up in the following weeks, coinciding with budget discussions.“In rural Missouri there’s a huge shortage of just being able to find places for child care, and in the urban areas of course, too, but even more so in the rural parts of the state. So that’s kind of No. 1 for me, I would love to see more around that,” Quade said.Police control and circuit attorney takeoverTwo of the longest debates over legislation in the House so far dealt with matters specific to St. Louis.House lawmakers have passed a bill that would take control of the St. Louis police department away from the city and put it under a state-appointed board.They also approved a bill that would allow for the governor to appoint a special prosecutor to address violent crime in cities that meet a specific homicide case threshold.Currently, St. Louis is the only city that meets that threshold, and the bill is widely seen as targeting St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner. Gardner is currently facing an attempt from Attorney General Andrew Bailey to remove her from office.Patterson said that if that bill is the only thing the legislature passes, he would consider the session a success.“I think what you’ve seen in the city of St. Louis is that they need help prosecuting crimes,” Patterson said. “And so if we can get this bill done, we can do something about crime in the city of St. Louis. I think that would be a good thing for the state.”Bosley disagrees and said there is always going to be an attack on St. Louis from lawmakers in Jefferson City.“It’s a minority-majority city. There’s always an attempt to try to tell the citizens of St. Louis what they can and can’t do,” Bosley said.An amendment that did not make it into the prosecutor bill would bar minors from carrying firearms on public property without adult supervision. Patterson said there could be a path to deal with that issue.“I think what you’ll see is that we would like to address juvenile crime in a comprehensive package, and so you might see something in there,” Patterson said. “But we’re all in agreement that we do not want teenagers walking around the city of St. Louis, or any city, with guns.”However, if any of those measures include restrictions on firearms, O’Laughlin will not support them.“People want to say the reason that we have crime is we have too many guns, so we will lock down on who can own firearms. Well, people should be able to protect themselves, their property, their families,” O’Laughlin said.Sports bettingMissouri hasn’t legalized sports betting, putting it in the minority among surrounding states.Both the House and Senate have legislation that could be brought up for debate on the floor. However, any sports betting bill that makes it to the Senate floor will likely face attempts to add language that would authorize video gaming terminals.Those machines are all over the state in areas like truck stops but are unregulated.Sen. Denny Hoskins’ bill that addressed both sports betting and the terminals was defeated in committee, while a different bill just on sports betting has advanced.
[ad_2]
Source link
Politics
Poll: Support for Missouri abortion rights amendment growing
[ad_1]
A proposed constitutional amendment legalizing abortion in Missouri received support from more than half of respondents in a new poll from St. Louis University and YouGov.That’s a boost from a poll earlier this year, which could mean what’s known as Amendment 3 is in a solid position to pass in November.SLU/YouGov’s poll of 900 likely Missouri voters from Aug. 8-16 found that 52% of respondents would vote for Amendment 3, which would place constitutional protections for abortion up to fetal viability. Thirty-four percent would vote against the measure, while 14% aren’t sure.By comparison, the SLU/YouGov poll from February found that 44% of voters would back the abortion legalization amendment.St. Louis University political science professor Steven Rogers said 32% of Republicans and 53% of independents would vote for the amendment. That’s in addition to nearly 80% of Democratic respondents who would approve the measure. In the previous poll, 24% of Republicans supported the amendment.Rogers noted that neither Amendment 3 nor a separate ballot item raising the state’s minimum wage is helping Democratic candidates. GOP contenders for U.S. Senate, governor, lieutenant governor, treasurer and secretary of state all hold comfortable leads.“We are seeing this kind of crossover voting, a little bit, where there are voters who are basically saying, ‘I am going to the polls and I’m going to support a Republican candidate, but I’m also going to go to the polls and then I’m also going to try to expand abortion access and then raise the minimum wage,’” Rogers said.Republican gubernatorial nominee Mike Kehoe has a 51%-41% lead over Democrat Crystal Quade. And U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley is leading Democrat Lucas Kunce by 53% to 42%. Some GOP candidates for attorney general, secretary of state and treasurer have even larger leads over their Democratic rivals.
Brian Munoz
/
St. Louis Public RadioHundreds of demonstrators pack into a parking lot at Planned Parenthood of St. Louis and Southwest Missouri on June 24, 2022, during a demonstration following the Supreme Court’s reversal of a case that guaranteed the constitutional right to an abortion.
One of the biggest challenges for foes of Amendment 3 could be financial.Typically, Missouri ballot initiatives with well-funded and well-organized campaigns have a better chance of passing — especially if the opposition is underfunded and disorganized. Since the end of July, the campaign committee formed to pass Amendment 3 received more than $3 million in donations of $5,000 or more.That money could be used for television advertisements to improve the proposal’s standing further, Rogers said, as well as point out that Missouri’s current abortion ban doesn’t allow the procedure in the case of rape or incest.“Meanwhile, the anti side won’t have those resources to kind of try to make that counter argument as strongly, and they don’t have public opinion as strongly on their side,” Rogers said.There is precedent of a well-funded initiative almost failing due to opposition from socially conservative voters.In 2006, a measure providing constitutional protections for embryonic stem cell research nearly failed — even though a campaign committee aimed at passing it had a commanding financial advantage.Former state Sen. Bob Onder was part of the opposition campaign to that measure. He said earlier this month it is possible to create a similar dynamic in 2024 against Amendment 3, if social conservatives who oppose abortion rights can band together.“This is not about reproductive rights or care for miscarriages or IVF or anything else,” said Onder, the GOP nominee for Missouri’s 3rd Congressional District seat. “Missourians will learn that out-of-state special interests and dark money from out of state is lying to them and they will reject this amendment.”Quade said earlier this month that Missourians of all political ideologies are ready to roll back the state’s abortion ban.“Regardless of political party, we hear from folks who are tired of politicians being in their doctor’s offices,” Quade said. “They want politicians to mind their own business. So this is going to excite folks all across the political spectrum.”
[ad_2]
Source link
Politics
Democrat Mark Osmack makes his case for Missouri treasurer
[ad_1]
Mark Osmack has been out of the electoral fray for awhile, but he never completely abandoned his passion for Missouri politics.Osmack, a Valley Park native and U.S. Army veteran, previously ran for Missouri’s 2nd Congressional District seat and for state Senate. Now he’s the Democratic nominee for state treasurer after receiving a phone call from Missouri Democratic Party Chairman Russ Carnahan asking him to run.“There’s a lot of decision making and processing and evaluation that goes into it, which is something I am very passionate and interested in,” Osmack said this week on an episode of Politically Speaking.Osmack is squaring off against state Treasurer Vivek Malek, who was able to easily win a crowded GOP primary against several veteran lawmakers including House Budget Chairman Cody Smith and state Sen. Andrew Koenig.While Malek was able to attract big donations to his political action committee and pour his own money into the campaign, Osmack isn’t worried that he won’t be able to compete in November. Since Malek was appointed to his post, Osmack contends he hasn’t proven that he’s a formidable opponent in a general election.“His actions and his decision making so far in his roughly two year tenure in that office have been questionable,” Osmack said.Among other things, Osmack was critical of Malek for placing unclaimed property notices on video gaming machines which are usually found in gas stations or convenience stores. The legality of the machines has been questioned for some time.As Malek explained on his own episode of Politically Speaking, he wanted to make sure the unclaimed property program was as widely advertised as possible. But he acknowledged it was a mistake to put the decals close to the machines and ultimately decided to remove them.Osmack said: “This doesn’t even pass the common sense sniff test of, ‘Hey, should I put state stickers claiming you might have a billion dollars on a gambling machine that is not registered with the state of Missouri?’ If we’re gonna give kudos for him acknowledging the wrong thing, it never should have been done in the first place.”Osmack’s platform includes supporting programs providing school meals using Missouri agriculture products and making child care more accessible for the working class.He said the fact that Missouri has such a large surplus shows that it’s possible to create programs to make child care within reach for parents.“It is quite audacious for [Republicans] to brag about $8 billion, with a B, dollars in state surplus, while we offer next to no social services to include pre-K, daycare, or child care,” Osmack said.Here’s are some other topics Osmack discussed on the show:How he would handle managing the state’s pension systems and approving low-income housing tax credits. The state treasurer’s office is on boards overseeing both of those programs.Malek’s decision to cut off investments from Chinese companies. Osmack said that Missouri needs to be cautious about abandoning China as a business partner, especially since they’re a major consumer of the state’s agriculture products. “There’s a way to make this work where we are not supporting communist nations to the detriment of the United States or our allies, while also maintaining strong economic ties that benefit Missouri farmers,” he said.What it was like to witness the skirmish at the Missouri State Fair between U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley and Democratic challenger Lucas Kunce.Whether Kunce can get the support of influential groups like the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, which often channels money and staff to states with competitive Senate elections.
[ad_2]
Source link
Politics
As Illinois receives praise for its cannabis equity efforts, stakeholders work on system’s flaws
[ad_1]
Medical marijuana patients can now purchase cannabis grown by small businesses as part of their allotment, Illinois’ top cannabis regulator said, but smaller, newly licensed cannabis growers are still seeking greater access to the state’s medical marijuana customers.Illinois legalized medicinal marijuana beginning in 2014, then legalized it for recreational use in 2020. While the 2020 law legalized cannabis use for any adult age 21 or older, it did not expand licensing for medical dispensaries.Patients can purchase marijuana as part of the medical cannabis program at dual-purpose dispensaries, which are licensed to serve both medical and recreational customers. But dual-purpose dispensaries are greatly outnumbered by dispensaries only licensed to sell recreationally, and there are no medical-only dispensaries in the state.As another part of the adult-use legalization law, lawmakers created a “craft grow” license category that was designed to give more opportunities to Illinoisans hoping to legally grow and sell marijuana. The smaller-scale grow operations were part of the 2020 law’s efforts to diversify the cannabis industry in Illinois.Prior to that, all cultivation centers in Illinois were large-scale operations dominated by large multi-state operators. The existing cultivators, mostly in operation since 2014, were allowed to grow recreational cannabis beginning in 2019.Until recently, dual-purpose dispensaries have been unsure as to whether craft-grown products, made by social equity licensees — those who have lived in a disproportionately impacted area or have been historically impacted by the war on drugs — can be sold medicinally as part of a patient’s medical allotment.Erin Johnson, the state’s cannabis regulation oversight officer, told Capitol News Illinois last month that her office has “been telling dispensaries, as they have been asking us” they can now sell craft-grown products to medical patients.“There was just a track and trace issue on our end, but never anything statutorily,” she said.
Dilpreet Raju
/
Capitol News IllinoisThe graphic shows how cannabis grown in Illinois gets from cultivation centers to customers.
No notice has been posted, but Johnson’s verbal guidance comes almost two years after the first craft grow business went online in Illinois.It allows roughly 150,000 medical patients, who dispensary owners say are the most consistent purchasers of marijuana, to buy products made by social equity businesses without paying recreational taxes. However — even as more dispensaries open — the number available to medical patients has not increased since 2018, something the Cannabis Regulation Oversight Office “desperately” wants to see changed. Johnson said Illinois is a limited license state, meaning “there are caps on everything” to help control the relatively new market.Berwyn Thompkins, who operates two cannabis businesses, said the rules limited options for patients and small businesses.“It’s about access,” Thompkins said. “Why wouldn’t we want all the patients — which the (adult-use) program was initially built around — why wouldn’t we want them to have access? They should have access to any dispensary.”Customers with a medical marijuana card pay a 1% tax on all marijuana products, whereas recreational customers pay retail taxes between roughly 20 and 40% on a given cannabis product, when accounting for local taxes.While Illinois has received praise for its equity-focused cannabis law, including through an independent study that showed more people of color own cannabis licenses than in any other state, some industry operators say they’ve experienced many unnecessary hurdles getting their businesses up and running.The state, in fact, announced last month that it had opened its 100th social equity dispensary.But Steve Olson, purchasing manager at a pair of dispensaries (including one dual-purpose dispensary) near Rockford, said small specialty license holders have been left in the lurch since the first craft grower opened in October 2022.“You would think that this would be something they’re (the government) trying to help out these social equity companies with, but they’re putting handcuffs on them in so many different spots,” he said. “One of them being this medical thing.”Olson said he contacted state agencies, including the Department of Financial and Professional Regulation, months ago about whether craft products can be sold to medical patients at their retail tax rate, but only heard one response: “They all say it was an oversight.”This potentially hurt social equity companies because they sell wholesale to dispensaries and may have been missing out on a consistent customer base through those medical dispensaries.Olson said the state’s attempts to provide licensees with a path to a successful business over the years, such as with corrective lotteries that granted more social equity licenses, have come up short.“It’s like they almost set up the social equity thing to fail so the big guys could come in and swoop up all these licenses,” Olson said. “I hate to feel like that but, if you look at it, it’s pretty black and white.”Olson said craft companies benefit from any type of retail sale.“If we sell it to medical patients or not, it’s a matter of, ‘Are we collecting the proper taxes?’ That’s all it is,” he said.State revenue from cannabis taxes, licensing costs and other fees goes into the Cannabis Regulation Fund, which is used to fund a host of programs, including cannabis offense expungement, the general revenue fund, and the R3 campaign aiming to uplift disinvested communities.For fiscal year 2024, nearly $256 million was paid out from Cannabis Regulation Fund for related initiatives, which includes almost $89 million transferred to the state’s general revenue fund and more than $20 million distributed to local governments, according to the Illinois Department of Revenue.Medical access still limitedThe state’s 55 medical dispensaries that predate the 2020 legalization law, mostly owned by publicly traded multistate operators that had been operating in Illinois since 2014 under the state’s medical marijuana program, were automatically granted a right to licenses to sell recreationally in January 2020. That gave them a dual-purpose license that no new entrants into the market can receive under current law.Since expanding their clientele in 2020, Illinois dispensaries have sold more than $6 billion worth of cannabis products through recreational transactions alone.Nearly two-thirds of dispensaries licensed to sell to medical patients are in the northeast counties of Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake and Will. Dual-purpose dispensaries only represent about 20 percent of the state’s dispensaries.While the state began offering recreational dispensary licenses since the adult-use legalization law passed, it has not granted a new medical dispensary license since 2018. That has allowed the established players to continue to corner the market on the state’s nearly 150,000 medical marijuana patients.But social equity licensees and advocates say there are more ways to level the playing field, including expanding access to medical sales.Johnson, who became the state’s top cannabis regulator in late 2022, expressed hope for movement during the fall veto session on House Bill 2911, which would expand medical access to all Illinois dispensaries.“We would like every single dispensary in Illinois to be able to serve medical patients,” Johnson said. “It’s something that medical patients have been asking for, for years.”Johnson said the bill would benefit patients and small businesses.“It’s something we desperately want to happen as a state system, because we want to make sure that medical patients are able to easily access what they need,” she said. “We also think it’s good for our social equity dispensaries, as they’re opening, to be able to serve medical patients.”Rep. Bob Morgan, D-Deerfield, who was the first statewide project coordinator for Illinois’ medical cannabis program prior to joining the legislature, wrote in an email to Capitol News Illinois that the state needs to be doing more for its patients.“Illinois is failing the state’s 150,000 medical cannabis patients with debilitating conditions. Too many are still denied the patient protections they deserve, including access to their medicine,” Morgan wrote, adding he would continue to work with stakeholders on further legislation.Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news service covering state government. It is distributed to hundreds of newspapers, radio and TV stations statewide. It is funded primarily by the Illinois Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation, along with major contributions from the Illinois Broadcasters Foundation and Southern Illinois Editorial Association.
[ad_2]
Source link
-
Politics10 months ago
Prenzler ‘reconsidered’ campaign donors, accepts vendor funds
-
Business2 years ago
Fields Foods to open new grocery in Pagedale in March
-
Board Bills2 years ago
2022-2023 Board Bill 168 — City’s Capital Fund
-
Entertainment2 years ago
St.Louis Man Sounds Just Like Whitley Hewsten, Plans on Performing At The Shayfitz Arena.
-
Business2 years ago
We Live Here Auténtico! | The Hispanic Chamber | Community and Connection Central
-
Board Bills5 months ago
2024-2025 Board Bill 80 — Prohibiting Street Takeovers
-
Board Bills2 years ago
2022-2023 Board Bill 189 — Public Works and Improvement Program at the Airport
-
Local News2 years ago
VIDEO: St. Louis Visitor Has Meltdown on TikTok Over Gunshots