Connect with us

Politics

Missouri Gov. Parson touts legacy in final State of the State

Published

on

[ad_1]


Updated at 7 p.m. Jan. 24 with reaction from legislatorsWith his time in office coming to an end in less than a year, Missouri Gov. Mike Parson spent his final State of the State speech recounting his tenure in office — a roughly five-year period that he says transformed the way the state looked at transportation policy and reshaped how the government responded to a multitude of crises.“In every decision we make, we must look to the effects on the next generations and the ability for them to achieve their American Dream,” Parson said Wednesday. “In every decision, we must put people first. It’s a simple idea that has been our guiding principle since the very beginning. And that’s our final commitment to you. Until our final day we’ll continue to put people first.”During his speech, Parson pointed out that the state has paid down $600 million worth of debt and that he had signed several tax cuts into law.He also noted that the state’s unemployment rate remains paltry at around 2.1%, which he said was the lowest figure ever recorded in Missouri history.“Actually, it has been so low that our problem is not creating jobs but filling jobs,” Parson said. “Since becoming governor, we’ve added more than 110,000 jobs to our economy and closed out the year ranked 15th nationally for job creation.”Parson’s State of the State address coincided with the release of his proposed $52.7 billion budget, which for the most part shows a relatively normal financial priorities after several years of significant revenue growth and a bounty of federal funds.One key aspect of his budgetary plan is a 3.2% pay raise for state employees as well as a higher boost for state workers in places like juvenile detention centers and mental health facilities.“When I became governor, state government was quickly becoming underappreciated, understaffed, and underpaid,” Parson said. “That’s why we approved three historic pay increases to recruit and retain quality talent across state government — raising team member pay by over 20% since 2018.”Parson also pointed out that he’s appointed more than 100 judges and filled an unprecedented five statewide office vacancies. He’s also made three picks to the Missouri Supreme Court to make it majority female for the first time. And he picked Gabe Gore, who attended Wednesday’s speech, to become St. Louis circuit attorney; Parson said the “level of professionalism between the circuit attorney’s office, metro police, the courts, the attorney general’s office, and our office is greater than I have ever experienced.”He added that he’s worked through the state’s clemency backlog, which he said showed that his administration is embracing the concept of giving second chances to people.“When I became governor, we also inherited nearly 4,000 pending clemency applications. While I’m a law and order governor, 4,000 people in limbo waiting for an answer is not how we do good business,” Parson said. “Whether approved or denied, we set out to provide answers. Today, I’m proud to announce that the clemency backlog we inherited has been totally cleared for the first time in decades.”

Eric Lee

/

St. Louis Public RadioThe Missouri Capitol on Wednesday in Jefferson City. Gov. Mike Parson delivered his last State of the State address on Wednesday.

Transportation movementOne of the big focuses of Parson’s speech was his record on infrastructure and workforce development — two broad priorities that have been a key part of his gubernatorial messaging since he was sworn into office in June 2018.In addition to recounting how lawmakers made a historic investment in expanding the number of lanes on Interstate 70, he said his budget will lay the groundwork to expand Interstate 44 — something that’s been a priority for lawmakers in south central and southwest Missouri.Parson said U.S. Rep. Sam Graves, R-Tarkio, who heads the House Transportation Committee, told him the state will receive over $90 million in additional funds to put toward projects on I-70. With these additional funds and those savings, Parson then announced the establishment of the I-44 Improvement Fund.“This fund will build on the nearly $150 million already included in the current [state transportation plan],” Parson said. “That’s right, we aren’t just laying the foundation to expand and improve one interstate across our state but two interstates.”Parson reiterated his desire to pass tax credits to help child care centers, something that was a priority in his 2023 State of the State speech but failed to get over the legislative finish line.He said those “programs will help improve access and affordability for families seeking child care across the state of Missouri.”“When it comes to preparing Missourians for the workforce, we know we are on solid ground. The biggest thing we can do is simply continue,” Parson said. “But today our state is in critical need of quality early learning programs. Business leaders estimate that lack of early learning programs is costing our state over $1 billion annually. And over 85% of Missourians believe early childhood learning supports a child’s success, parents’ success and business success.”

Eric Lee

/

St. Louis Public RadioMissouri Gov. Mike Parson shakes hands with legislators ahead of his State of the State address to a joint session of the House and Senate on Wednesday in Jefferson City.

A long public service careerParson used his speech to reflect on his lengthy career in public service, which began as Polk County sheriff and continued as a member of the Missouri House and Senate. He became lieutenant governor in 2016 – and ultimately ascended to the governorship after Eric Greitens left office under a cloud of scandal.“After serving six sessions in the House, six sessions in the Senate, two sessions as lieutenant governor, and now my sixth and final session as your 57th governor, I am expected to say this is a bittersweet moment,” Parson said. “But while the view from this dais facing all of you is a fine sight to see, it’s no comparison to the view of the Polk County fields behind the windshield of my John Deere tractor. But look, I promise to think of all of you — on occasion.”While Parson’s relationship with the legislature was an improvement from the stormy discord under the Greitens administration, he did have to contend with criticism — particularly from some members of his own party.Some legislators have decried how the state budget went up during his tenure. And even though the GOP has large majorities in both chambers, infighting within the Missouri GOP caucus often stymied some of the governor’s priorities.He’s also been criticized by Democrats for his decision to sign legislation that banned most abortions in the state and for supporting restrictions on transgender minors obtaining puberty blockers and hormone therapy. And he faced numerous challenges steering the state through the COVID-19 pandemic.

Gov. Parson’s 2024 State of the State Address

Parson didn’t address any of his critics directly, but he did note that his administration wasn’t always universally beloved.“Have there been critics? Sure, but critics are a dime a dozen,” Parson said. “One thing I’ve learned in life, you’ll never be criticized by someone doing more than you. It will always be the person doing less who makes the most noise. Through all the criticism, we never stopped working for the people of Missouri.”He highlighted the state’s ban on most abortions, which went into effect after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022.“When I came to Jefferson City, nearly 8,000 elective abortions were performed annually in Missouri,” Parson said. “As I stand before you today, I’m proud to report that number is zero.”Whether that statistic remains the same in the future is in flux, as proponents of abortion rights are seeking to put a constitutional amendment before voters that would legalize abortion up to fetal viability.After ticking off various accomplishments of his administration, Parson then said: “No one and I mean no one has gone to bat for the people of Missouri like this administration and you. And today we have won.”Legislators react to speechOn multiple occasions during Parson’s speech, House Democrats were the first to stand up and applaud proposed policies.After the address, House Minority Leader Crystal Quade, D-Springfield, who’s running for governor, said Parson offered several strong proposals that House Democrats can get behind.That includes expanding access to child care, a topic on which Quade said she’s encountered resistance from Republicans.“We’re glad the governor understands that ensuring parents have safe and affordable child care options is vital for those parents to be able to work, provide for their families and help grow our economy,” Quade said.Other proposals from Parson that Quade praised included $120 million in additional funding to the state’s K-12 foundation formula, $1.5 billion for broadband infrastructure and $7.2 million for combating maternal mortality.“We want to see bills on these issues hit the governor’s desk, and we’ll do our part to make that happen,” Quade said.But Quade said the dysfunction caused by far-right Republicans means prospects are not good for the legislature to pass anything important this session.“Just like in D.C., a small group of GOP extremists are holding the legislative process hostage in an attempt to bully through legislation that’s unpopular with most lawmakers and definitely most Missourians,” Quade said.Despite agreeing with many of Parson’s proposals, Quade disagreed with his comments on abortion, in which the governor celebrated the lack of abortions happening in Missouri.“Where this speech fell flat is absolutely around women’s access to reproductive health care,” Quade said. “That is going to be on the ballot this fall. We’re very excited about that, and we know absolutely it is going to pass.”Some lawmakers from both parties were disappointed by what Parson didn’t talk about in the speech.Sen. Bill Eigel, R-St. Charles County, who also is running for governor, said Parson should have used some of his address to push for a ballot initiative to make the Missouri Constitution more difficult to amend.“I’m really disappointed that we didn’t hear one word about initiative petition reform coming from the governor tonight,” Eigel said.Some of Eigel’s GOP colleagues from a faction known as the Freedom Caucus have held up the governor’s appointments over the issue. That move prompted Senate leaders Tuesday to strip those lawmakers of committee chairmanships and vice chairmanships.Eigel also continued his criticism of Parson for allowing the budget to increase under his watch.And while Parson’s budget will increase employee pay, Rep. Raychel Proudie, D-Ferguson, said that isn’t a big enough boost to persuade people to work for or stay in the state’s Children’s Division, which has struggled for years to attract and retain employees. Most recently, the agency’s St. Louis branch has dealt with a shortage of child abuse and neglect investigators, which in turn created a backlog of cases.Proudie, a member of the House Budget Committee and the ranking member of the Children and Families Committee, said she’ll push to get a bigger pay increase for Children’s Division employees. Currently, the starting salary for child abuse investigators is around $43,000.“If I can go down by the local Walmart and get tuition assistance and health care and other things on Day One,” Proudie said, “why am I going to work at such a hard job and be overworked and overburdened for $40,000?”

[ad_2]

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Poll: Support for Missouri abortion rights amendment growing

Published

on

[ad_1]


A proposed constitutional amendment legalizing abortion in Missouri received support from more than half of respondents in a new poll from St. Louis University and YouGov.That’s a boost from a poll earlier this year, which could mean what’s known as Amendment 3 is in a solid position to pass in November.SLU/YouGov’s poll of 900 likely Missouri voters from Aug. 8-16 found that 52% of respondents would vote for Amendment 3, which would place constitutional protections for abortion up to fetal viability. Thirty-four percent would vote against the measure, while 14% aren’t sure.By comparison, the SLU/YouGov poll from February found that 44% of voters would back the abortion legalization amendment.St. Louis University political science professor Steven Rogers said 32% of Republicans and 53% of independents would vote for the amendment. That’s in addition to nearly 80% of Democratic respondents who would approve the measure. In the previous poll, 24% of Republicans supported the amendment.Rogers noted that neither Amendment 3 nor a separate ballot item raising the state’s minimum wage is helping Democratic candidates. GOP contenders for U.S. Senate, governor, lieutenant governor, treasurer and secretary of state all hold comfortable leads.“We are seeing this kind of crossover voting, a little bit, where there are voters who are basically saying, ‘I am going to the polls and I’m going to support a Republican candidate, but I’m also going to go to the polls and then I’m also going to try to expand abortion access and then raise the minimum wage,’” Rogers said.Republican gubernatorial nominee Mike Kehoe has a 51%-41% lead over Democrat Crystal Quade. And U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley is leading Democrat Lucas Kunce by 53% to 42%. Some GOP candidates for attorney general, secretary of state and treasurer have even larger leads over their Democratic rivals.

Brian Munoz

/

St. Louis Public RadioHundreds of demonstrators pack into a parking lot at Planned Parenthood of St. Louis and Southwest Missouri on June 24, 2022, during a demonstration following the Supreme Court’s reversal of a case that guaranteed the constitutional right to an abortion.

One of the biggest challenges for foes of Amendment 3 could be financial.Typically, Missouri ballot initiatives with well-funded and well-organized campaigns have a better chance of passing — especially if the opposition is underfunded and disorganized. Since the end of July, the campaign committee formed to pass Amendment 3 received more than $3 million in donations of $5,000 or more.That money could be used for television advertisements to improve the proposal’s standing further, Rogers said, as well as point out that Missouri’s current abortion ban doesn’t allow the procedure in the case of rape or incest.“Meanwhile, the anti side won’t have those resources to kind of try to make that counter argument as strongly, and they don’t have public opinion as strongly on their side,” Rogers said.There is precedent of a well-funded initiative almost failing due to opposition from socially conservative voters.In 2006, a measure providing constitutional protections for embryonic stem cell research nearly failed — even though a campaign committee aimed at passing it had a commanding financial advantage.Former state Sen. Bob Onder was part of the opposition campaign to that measure. He said earlier this month it is possible to create a similar dynamic in 2024 against Amendment 3, if social conservatives who oppose abortion rights can band together.“This is not about reproductive rights or care for miscarriages or IVF or anything else,” said Onder, the GOP nominee for Missouri’s 3rd Congressional District seat. “Missourians will learn that out-of-state special interests and dark money from out of state is lying to them and they will reject this amendment.”Quade said earlier this month that Missourians of all political ideologies are ready to roll back the state’s abortion ban.“Regardless of political party, we hear from folks who are tired of politicians being in their doctor’s offices,” Quade said. “They want politicians to mind their own business. So this is going to excite folks all across the political spectrum.”

[ad_2]

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Democrat Mark Osmack makes his case for Missouri treasurer

Published

on

[ad_1]


Mark Osmack has been out of the electoral fray for awhile, but he never completely abandoned his passion for Missouri politics.Osmack, a Valley Park native and U.S. Army veteran, previously ran for Missouri’s 2nd Congressional District seat and for state Senate. Now he’s the Democratic nominee for state treasurer after receiving a phone call from Missouri Democratic Party Chairman Russ Carnahan asking him to run.“There’s a lot of decision making and processing and evaluation that goes into it, which is something I am very passionate and interested in,” Osmack said this week on an episode of Politically Speaking.Osmack is squaring off against state Treasurer Vivek Malek, who was able to easily win a crowded GOP primary against several veteran lawmakers including House Budget Chairman Cody Smith and state Sen. Andrew Koenig.While Malek was able to attract big donations to his political action committee and pour his own money into the campaign, Osmack isn’t worried that he won’t be able to compete in November. Since Malek was appointed to his post, Osmack contends he hasn’t proven that he’s a formidable opponent in a general election.“His actions and his decision making so far in his roughly two year tenure in that office have been questionable,” Osmack said.Among other things, Osmack was critical of Malek for placing unclaimed property notices on video gaming machines which are usually found in gas stations or convenience stores. The legality of the machines has been questioned for some time.As Malek explained on his own episode of Politically Speaking, he wanted to make sure the unclaimed property program was as widely advertised as possible. But he acknowledged it was a mistake to put the decals close to the machines and ultimately decided to remove them.Osmack said: “This doesn’t even pass the common sense sniff test of, ‘Hey, should I put state stickers claiming you might have a billion dollars on a gambling machine that is not registered with the state of Missouri?’ If we’re gonna give kudos for him acknowledging the wrong thing, it never should have been done in the first place.”Osmack’s platform includes supporting programs providing school meals using Missouri agriculture products and making child care more accessible for the working class.He said the fact that Missouri has such a large surplus shows that it’s possible to create programs to make child care within reach for parents.“It is quite audacious for [Republicans] to brag about $8 billion, with a B, dollars in state surplus, while we offer next to no social services to include pre-K, daycare, or child care,” Osmack said.Here’s are some other topics Osmack discussed on the show:How he would handle managing the state’s pension systems and approving low-income housing tax credits. The state treasurer’s office is on boards overseeing both of those programs.Malek’s decision to cut off investments from Chinese companies. Osmack said that Missouri needs to be cautious about abandoning China as a business partner, especially since they’re a major consumer of the state’s agriculture products. “There’s a way to make this work where we are not supporting communist nations to the detriment of the United States or our allies, while also maintaining strong economic ties that benefit Missouri farmers,” he said.What it was like to witness the skirmish at the Missouri State Fair between U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley and Democratic challenger Lucas Kunce.Whether Kunce can get the support of influential groups like the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, which often channels money and staff to states with competitive Senate elections.

[ad_2]

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

As Illinois receives praise for its cannabis equity efforts, stakeholders work on system’s flaws

Published

on

[ad_1]


Medical marijuana patients can now purchase cannabis grown by small businesses as part of their allotment, Illinois’ top cannabis regulator said, but smaller, newly licensed cannabis growers are still seeking greater access to the state’s medical marijuana customers.Illinois legalized medicinal marijuana beginning in 2014, then legalized it for recreational use in 2020. While the 2020 law legalized cannabis use for any adult age 21 or older, it did not expand licensing for medical dispensaries.Patients can purchase marijuana as part of the medical cannabis program at dual-purpose dispensaries, which are licensed to serve both medical and recreational customers. But dual-purpose dispensaries are greatly outnumbered by dispensaries only licensed to sell recreationally, and there are no medical-only dispensaries in the state.As another part of the adult-use legalization law, lawmakers created a “craft grow” license category that was designed to give more opportunities to Illinoisans hoping to legally grow and sell marijuana. The smaller-scale grow operations were part of the 2020 law’s efforts to diversify the cannabis industry in Illinois.Prior to that, all cultivation centers in Illinois were large-scale operations dominated by large multi-state operators. The existing cultivators, mostly in operation since 2014, were allowed to grow recreational cannabis beginning in 2019.Until recently, dual-purpose dispensaries have been unsure as to whether craft-grown products, made by social equity licensees — those who have lived in a disproportionately impacted area or have been historically impacted by the war on drugs — can be sold medicinally as part of a patient’s medical allotment.Erin Johnson, the state’s cannabis regulation oversight officer, told Capitol News Illinois last month that her office has “been telling dispensaries, as they have been asking us” they can now sell craft-grown products to medical patients.“There was just a track and trace issue on our end, but never anything statutorily,” she said.

Dilpreet Raju

/

Capitol News IllinoisThe graphic shows how cannabis grown in Illinois gets from cultivation centers to customers.

No notice has been posted, but Johnson’s verbal guidance comes almost two years after the first craft grow business went online in Illinois.It allows roughly 150,000 medical patients, who dispensary owners say are the most consistent purchasers of marijuana, to buy products made by social equity businesses without paying recreational taxes. However — even as more dispensaries open — the number available to medical patients has not increased since 2018, something the Cannabis Regulation Oversight Office “desperately” wants to see changed. Johnson said Illinois is a limited license state, meaning “there are caps on everything” to help control the relatively new market.Berwyn Thompkins, who operates two cannabis businesses, said the rules limited options for patients and small businesses.“It’s about access,” Thompkins said. “Why wouldn’t we want all the patients — which the (adult-use) program was initially built around — why wouldn’t we want them to have access? They should have access to any dispensary.”Customers with a medical marijuana card pay a 1% tax on all marijuana products, whereas recreational customers pay retail taxes between roughly 20 and 40% on a given cannabis product, when accounting for local taxes.While Illinois has received praise for its equity-focused cannabis law, including through an independent study that showed more people of color own cannabis licenses than in any other state, some industry operators say they’ve experienced many unnecessary hurdles getting their businesses up and running.The state, in fact, announced last month that it had opened its 100th social equity dispensary.But Steve Olson, purchasing manager at a pair of dispensaries (including one dual-purpose dispensary) near Rockford, said small specialty license holders have been left in the lurch since the first craft grower opened in October 2022.“You would think that this would be something they’re (the government) trying to help out these social equity companies with, but they’re putting handcuffs on them in so many different spots,” he said. “One of them being this medical thing.”Olson said he contacted state agencies, including the Department of Financial and Professional Regulation, months ago about whether craft products can be sold to medical patients at their retail tax rate, but only heard one response: “They all say it was an oversight.”This potentially hurt social equity companies because they sell wholesale to dispensaries and may have been missing out on a consistent customer base through those medical dispensaries.Olson said the state’s attempts to provide licensees with a path to a successful business over the years, such as with corrective lotteries that granted more social equity licenses, have come up short.“It’s like they almost set up the social equity thing to fail so the big guys could come in and swoop up all these licenses,” Olson said. “I hate to feel like that but, if you look at it, it’s pretty black and white.”Olson said craft companies benefit from any type of retail sale.“If we sell it to medical patients or not, it’s a matter of, ‘Are we collecting the proper taxes?’ That’s all it is,” he said.State revenue from cannabis taxes, licensing costs and other fees goes into the Cannabis Regulation Fund, which is used to fund a host of programs, including cannabis offense expungement, the general revenue fund, and the R3 campaign aiming to uplift disinvested communities.For fiscal year 2024, nearly $256 million was paid out from Cannabis Regulation Fund for related initiatives, which includes almost $89 million transferred to the state’s general revenue fund and more than $20 million distributed to local governments, according to the Illinois Department of Revenue.Medical access still limitedThe state’s 55 medical dispensaries that predate the 2020 legalization law, mostly owned by publicly traded multistate operators that had been operating in Illinois since 2014 under the state’s medical marijuana program, were automatically granted a right to licenses to sell recreationally in January 2020. That gave them a dual-purpose license that no new entrants into the market can receive under current law.Since expanding their clientele in 2020, Illinois dispensaries have sold more than $6 billion worth of cannabis products through recreational transactions alone.Nearly two-thirds of dispensaries licensed to sell to medical patients are in the northeast counties of Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake and Will. Dual-purpose dispensaries only represent about 20 percent of the state’s dispensaries.While the state began offering recreational dispensary licenses since the adult-use legalization law passed, it has not granted a new medical dispensary license since 2018. That has allowed the established players to continue to corner the market on the state’s nearly 150,000 medical marijuana patients.But social equity licensees and advocates say there are more ways to level the playing field, including expanding access to medical sales.Johnson, who became the state’s top cannabis regulator in late 2022, expressed hope for movement during the fall veto session on House Bill 2911, which would expand medical access to all Illinois dispensaries.“We would like every single dispensary in Illinois to be able to serve medical patients,” Johnson said. “It’s something that medical patients have been asking for, for years.”Johnson said the bill would benefit patients and small businesses.“It’s something we desperately want to happen as a state system, because we want to make sure that medical patients are able to easily access what they need,” she said. “We also think it’s good for our social equity dispensaries, as they’re opening, to be able to serve medical patients.”Rep. Bob Morgan, D-Deerfield, who was the first statewide project coordinator for Illinois’ medical cannabis program prior to joining the legislature, wrote in an email to Capitol News Illinois that the state needs to be doing more for its patients.“Illinois is failing the state’s 150,000 medical cannabis patients with debilitating conditions. Too many are still denied the patient protections they deserve, including access to their medicine,” Morgan wrote, adding he would continue to work with stakeholders on further legislation.Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news service covering state government. It is distributed to hundreds of newspapers, radio and TV stations statewide. It is funded primarily by the Illinois Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation, along with major contributions from the Illinois Broadcasters Foundation and Southern Illinois Editorial Association.

[ad_2]

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending