Politics
Legalizing sports betting in Missouri may require voter support
[ad_1]
Most of the bills passed by Missouri lawmakers and signed into law this past legislative session went into effect on Monday, but one issue that still hasn’t made it through the Capitol is legalizing sports betting.The Missouri House voted in the past two sessions to advance a bill that would make it legal for people in Missouri to place bets both in person at casinos and online. However, the Senate has not advanced any of the legislation.This lack of action has led to frustration from lawmakers, casinos, sports organizations and people who now make it a habit to drive across state lines in order to place a bet.Cameron Basden used to live in Illinois but has lived in the St. Louis area for the past few months. Basden makes his living betting on sports, so every day he drives from Missouri to Illinois to place his bets.“I probably spend like two, three hours driving a day just to get over there and to get back,” Basden said.Paul Halfacre, a Florissant resident, only places bets in person as opposed to on his phone. He says seeing states that surround Missouri legalize sports betting makes him wonder why the state is behind on this issue.“I don’t know where the money goes after it gets out of my hands, but it might go back into the community when my money is now going over to the community in Alton or Collinsville as opposed to St. Charles,” Halfacre said.Brett Koenig, who is behind Let MO Play, which advocates legalizing sports betting, said some of the disappointment is just seeing the dysfunction within the legislature on the issue.“It’s frustrating and feels like something that we should be able to do,” Koenig said.Missouri lags behind other states
Brian Munoz
/
St. Louis Public RadioBill Dewitt III, president of the St. Louis Cardinals, on Aug. 10 outside of his office in Busch Stadium. The Cardinals, with Dewitt at the helm, are one of the Missouri-based sports franchises pushing for the legalization of sports betting in the state. “While the clock ticks, we have all of our surrounding states that have legalized it and regulated it and they’re collecting tax revenue from it,” he said. “Here we are in Missouri, you know, waiting to try to break the logjam.”
Over 30 states have legalized sports betting, including all but one of the states, Oklahoma, that border Missouri.Rep. Dan Houx, R-Warrensburg, has worked his legislation through the House the past two years.“We got it out of the House and then over to the Senate; they kind of just sat on it,” Houx said.Houx’s bill passed the House with a vote of 118-35. The year before, the vote was 115-33.Through this bill, sports betting would be legal both in person at the state’s casinos and online, including through mobile apps. People 21 and older would be able to bet on professional and collegiate sports.Sports betting would not be allowed in person at anywhere other than licensed facilities within a casino.Houx said it’s shameful that the legislature has not passed sports betting.“We’ve got a deep base of great sports teams, although this year, both sides of the state are struggling a little bit on baseball, but you know, people want to bet,” Houx said.
Tristen Rouse
/
St. Louis Public RadioCameron Basden, of Mehlville, places sports bets from his phone on Monday in the parking lot of a TJ Maxx in Fairview Heights. Basden regularly drives across the river to Illinois — sometimes multiple times a day — to place bets, which generate his primary source of income.
Mike Winter, executive director of the Missouri Gaming Association, said that while casinos would profit from allowing sports betting, a larger benefit is drawing in more customers who are interested in sports betting but wouldn’t normally enter a casino.“We’ll likely not see as much benefit as we do from our casino games, but there will be some benefits, hopefully with our properties, potentially building out sports betting opportunities and specific rooms, and which would attract more patrons to our casino properties,” Winter said.Drawing in new patrons is also appealing for sports organizations, including the St. Louis Cardinals.“We feel like it sort of opens up a new demo, where people all of a sudden get attracted to the game for slightly different reasons. And they might follow players, they might follow various aspects of the game that are unrelated to wins and losses, although that’s part of it, too,” said Cardinals President Bill DeWitt III.DeWitt has traveled to Jefferson City multiple times to testify in support of legislation legalizing sports betting. He says it’s frustrating that people are going either out of state to place bets or doing so illegally.“While the clock ticks, we have all of our surrounding states that have legalized it and regulated it and they’re collecting tax revenue from it. And here we are in Missouri, you know, waiting to try to break the logjam.” DeWitt said.The Cardinals aren’t the only sports organization that wants to see sports betting legal in Missouri. All of the state’s six professional teams have testified in support of legislation in Jefferson City.A legislative stalemate
Brian Munoz
/
St. Louis Public RadioMissouri state Sen. Denny Hoskins, R-Warrensburg, pictured in January during a Missouri Senate committee hearing, has been named by many as a roadblock to legalized sports gambling in the state. Hoskins wants to include video gambling machines, like those found in truck stops, to the bill, which has been met with objection from the legislature.
Despite multiple groups wanting to see sports betting pass, the issue remains at an impasse in the Missouri Senate.The roadblock largely has to do with Sen. Denny Hoskins, R-Warrensburg. Hoskins filed legislation legalizing sports betting, including the past session, but wants to include video gambling terminals like those often found at truck stops.Hoskins said he became interested in legalizing video machines as a way to raise money to aid veterans.“I was looking for a dedicated funding source to help out our veterans homes and cemeteries. Casino revenue has decreased significantly over the last several years and to the tune that we have to supplement our veterans homes and cemetery budget by about $50 million a year,” Hoskins said. “Passing a sports book only bill would give us zero increase in funding for our veterans homes and cemeteries as well as sportsbook doesn’t help out any of our small businesses either.”According to Hoskins’ bill, those machines would be allowed in veterans and fraternal organizations as well as bars.Comparing the fiscal impact notes of Houx’s and Hoskins’ bills, allowing both sports betting and video lottery terminals is anticipated to bring more than five times the state revenue as just sports betting.Hoskins says he thinks it makes the most sense to combine the two topics.“I think we just need to take care of the overall gaming discussion with one bill,” Hoskins said.Hoskins has received campaign contributions from organizations and businesses that are pro-video gambling terminals.
Missouri Sen. Denny Hoskins, R-Warrensburg, has received campaign contributions from organizations and businesses that back video gambling machines.
Hoskins said it makes sense that organizations and businesses that want video gaming machines legalized would support him.“This is something that I’ve been passionate about, about helping small businesses, veteran organizations and most certainly companies that would like to see that happen are going to support those senators that are supportive of that issue as well,” Hoskins said.Winter said the Missouri Gaming Association has testified against video gambling terminals before, and its position has not changed.“We’ve invested billions of dollars in Missouri and the voters have spoken that they want slot machines in certain locations, which are the 13 licensed casinos,” Winter said.On what will happen next session, Houx says he plans on introducing the same bill.“Hopefully, we’ll be in the top 10 bills that get out of the House in the month of January, you know, let’s get them going rather quickly,” Houx said.However, Hoskins is still waiting for a compromise and said he doesn’t see a path for sports betting without it.“Until the casinos are ready to come to the table and work on a solution and compromise, I don’t foresee a path that a sportsbook would pass in the state of Missouri,” Hoskins said.Matt DiMiceli, who lives in Kansas City, Missouri, and during football season makes the trip to Kansas a couple of times to make bets, believes sports betting and video gambling should be separate issues.“In my mind, it should be: Should sports betting be legal or not? Let’s vote on it. Should the digital video lottery terminals be legalized? Let’s talk about it, and then you can vote however you want. But to tie them together is ridiculous to me,” DiMiceli said.An alternate route
Brian Munoz
/
St. Louis Public RadioIf the Missouri legislature chooses to not act on legalizing sports betting during the upcoming session, a path forward could mean putting the issue before voters under the initiative petition process.
For DeWitt and the Cardinals, the path forward could mean putting the issue to voters directly if the legislature again fails to act this session.“I think that what we need to do is create a game plan where we work on an initiative petition process, which is a ballot initiative in Missouri, that would be ready for voters to vote on this issue in the November election of ’24,” DeWitt said.DeWitt said they the ballot language is still being worked on, but it would be similar to what has already passed the House.One question for those pushing to pass sports betting through the initiative petition process would be if it’s worth pursuing at all, since Hoskins is term limited after next session.Hoskins said he doesn’t believe this issue will cease to exist once he leaves.“I know some people think, ‘We’ll just wait Senator Hoskins out, and he’s termed out in 2024.’ But I would say there’s at least five or six different senators that feel the same way that I do and want to see both VLTs (video lottery terminals) and a sportsbook get passed,” Hoskins said.Hoskins said he isn’t sure how successful a ballot initiative would be.“The polling that I’ve seen doesn’t look like a sports book-only initiative would pass with Missouri voters,” Hoskins said.Hoskins referenced a SLU/YouGov poll published in March that showed 35% approval of legalizing sports betting and 41% disapproval. The poll surveyed 900 likely Missouri voters.However, DeWitt said they have done some polling, and it looks favorable.“I hate to make any predictions in something like that,” Dewitt said. “But we’re optimistic at this point that it’s something that Missourians want.”
[ad_2]
Source link
Politics
Poll: Support for Missouri abortion rights amendment growing

[ad_1]
A proposed constitutional amendment legalizing abortion in Missouri received support from more than half of respondents in a new poll from St. Louis University and YouGov.That’s a boost from a poll earlier this year, which could mean what’s known as Amendment 3 is in a solid position to pass in November.SLU/YouGov’s poll of 900 likely Missouri voters from Aug. 8-16 found that 52% of respondents would vote for Amendment 3, which would place constitutional protections for abortion up to fetal viability. Thirty-four percent would vote against the measure, while 14% aren’t sure.By comparison, the SLU/YouGov poll from February found that 44% of voters would back the abortion legalization amendment.St. Louis University political science professor Steven Rogers said 32% of Republicans and 53% of independents would vote for the amendment. That’s in addition to nearly 80% of Democratic respondents who would approve the measure. In the previous poll, 24% of Republicans supported the amendment.Rogers noted that neither Amendment 3 nor a separate ballot item raising the state’s minimum wage is helping Democratic candidates. GOP contenders for U.S. Senate, governor, lieutenant governor, treasurer and secretary of state all hold comfortable leads.“We are seeing this kind of crossover voting, a little bit, where there are voters who are basically saying, ‘I am going to the polls and I’m going to support a Republican candidate, but I’m also going to go to the polls and then I’m also going to try to expand abortion access and then raise the minimum wage,’” Rogers said.Republican gubernatorial nominee Mike Kehoe has a 51%-41% lead over Democrat Crystal Quade. And U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley is leading Democrat Lucas Kunce by 53% to 42%. Some GOP candidates for attorney general, secretary of state and treasurer have even larger leads over their Democratic rivals.
Brian Munoz
/
St. Louis Public RadioHundreds of demonstrators pack into a parking lot at Planned Parenthood of St. Louis and Southwest Missouri on June 24, 2022, during a demonstration following the Supreme Court’s reversal of a case that guaranteed the constitutional right to an abortion.
One of the biggest challenges for foes of Amendment 3 could be financial.Typically, Missouri ballot initiatives with well-funded and well-organized campaigns have a better chance of passing — especially if the opposition is underfunded and disorganized. Since the end of July, the campaign committee formed to pass Amendment 3 received more than $3 million in donations of $5,000 or more.That money could be used for television advertisements to improve the proposal’s standing further, Rogers said, as well as point out that Missouri’s current abortion ban doesn’t allow the procedure in the case of rape or incest.“Meanwhile, the anti side won’t have those resources to kind of try to make that counter argument as strongly, and they don’t have public opinion as strongly on their side,” Rogers said.There is precedent of a well-funded initiative almost failing due to opposition from socially conservative voters.In 2006, a measure providing constitutional protections for embryonic stem cell research nearly failed — even though a campaign committee aimed at passing it had a commanding financial advantage.Former state Sen. Bob Onder was part of the opposition campaign to that measure. He said earlier this month it is possible to create a similar dynamic in 2024 against Amendment 3, if social conservatives who oppose abortion rights can band together.“This is not about reproductive rights or care for miscarriages or IVF or anything else,” said Onder, the GOP nominee for Missouri’s 3rd Congressional District seat. “Missourians will learn that out-of-state special interests and dark money from out of state is lying to them and they will reject this amendment.”Quade said earlier this month that Missourians of all political ideologies are ready to roll back the state’s abortion ban.“Regardless of political party, we hear from folks who are tired of politicians being in their doctor’s offices,” Quade said. “They want politicians to mind their own business. So this is going to excite folks all across the political spectrum.”
[ad_2]
Source link
Politics
Democrat Mark Osmack makes his case for Missouri treasurer

[ad_1]
Mark Osmack has been out of the electoral fray for awhile, but he never completely abandoned his passion for Missouri politics.Osmack, a Valley Park native and U.S. Army veteran, previously ran for Missouri’s 2nd Congressional District seat and for state Senate. Now he’s the Democratic nominee for state treasurer after receiving a phone call from Missouri Democratic Party Chairman Russ Carnahan asking him to run.“There’s a lot of decision making and processing and evaluation that goes into it, which is something I am very passionate and interested in,” Osmack said this week on an episode of Politically Speaking.Osmack is squaring off against state Treasurer Vivek Malek, who was able to easily win a crowded GOP primary against several veteran lawmakers including House Budget Chairman Cody Smith and state Sen. Andrew Koenig.While Malek was able to attract big donations to his political action committee and pour his own money into the campaign, Osmack isn’t worried that he won’t be able to compete in November. Since Malek was appointed to his post, Osmack contends he hasn’t proven that he’s a formidable opponent in a general election.“His actions and his decision making so far in his roughly two year tenure in that office have been questionable,” Osmack said.Among other things, Osmack was critical of Malek for placing unclaimed property notices on video gaming machines which are usually found in gas stations or convenience stores. The legality of the machines has been questioned for some time.As Malek explained on his own episode of Politically Speaking, he wanted to make sure the unclaimed property program was as widely advertised as possible. But he acknowledged it was a mistake to put the decals close to the machines and ultimately decided to remove them.Osmack said: “This doesn’t even pass the common sense sniff test of, ‘Hey, should I put state stickers claiming you might have a billion dollars on a gambling machine that is not registered with the state of Missouri?’ If we’re gonna give kudos for him acknowledging the wrong thing, it never should have been done in the first place.”Osmack’s platform includes supporting programs providing school meals using Missouri agriculture products and making child care more accessible for the working class.He said the fact that Missouri has such a large surplus shows that it’s possible to create programs to make child care within reach for parents.“It is quite audacious for [Republicans] to brag about $8 billion, with a B, dollars in state surplus, while we offer next to no social services to include pre-K, daycare, or child care,” Osmack said.Here’s are some other topics Osmack discussed on the show:How he would handle managing the state’s pension systems and approving low-income housing tax credits. The state treasurer’s office is on boards overseeing both of those programs.Malek’s decision to cut off investments from Chinese companies. Osmack said that Missouri needs to be cautious about abandoning China as a business partner, especially since they’re a major consumer of the state’s agriculture products. “There’s a way to make this work where we are not supporting communist nations to the detriment of the United States or our allies, while also maintaining strong economic ties that benefit Missouri farmers,” he said.What it was like to witness the skirmish at the Missouri State Fair between U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley and Democratic challenger Lucas Kunce.Whether Kunce can get the support of influential groups like the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, which often channels money and staff to states with competitive Senate elections.
[ad_2]
Source link
Politics
As Illinois receives praise for its cannabis equity efforts, stakeholders work on system’s flaws

[ad_1]
Medical marijuana patients can now purchase cannabis grown by small businesses as part of their allotment, Illinois’ top cannabis regulator said, but smaller, newly licensed cannabis growers are still seeking greater access to the state’s medical marijuana customers.Illinois legalized medicinal marijuana beginning in 2014, then legalized it for recreational use in 2020. While the 2020 law legalized cannabis use for any adult age 21 or older, it did not expand licensing for medical dispensaries.Patients can purchase marijuana as part of the medical cannabis program at dual-purpose dispensaries, which are licensed to serve both medical and recreational customers. But dual-purpose dispensaries are greatly outnumbered by dispensaries only licensed to sell recreationally, and there are no medical-only dispensaries in the state.As another part of the adult-use legalization law, lawmakers created a “craft grow” license category that was designed to give more opportunities to Illinoisans hoping to legally grow and sell marijuana. The smaller-scale grow operations were part of the 2020 law’s efforts to diversify the cannabis industry in Illinois.Prior to that, all cultivation centers in Illinois were large-scale operations dominated by large multi-state operators. The existing cultivators, mostly in operation since 2014, were allowed to grow recreational cannabis beginning in 2019.Until recently, dual-purpose dispensaries have been unsure as to whether craft-grown products, made by social equity licensees — those who have lived in a disproportionately impacted area or have been historically impacted by the war on drugs — can be sold medicinally as part of a patient’s medical allotment.Erin Johnson, the state’s cannabis regulation oversight officer, told Capitol News Illinois last month that her office has “been telling dispensaries, as they have been asking us” they can now sell craft-grown products to medical patients.“There was just a track and trace issue on our end, but never anything statutorily,” she said.
Dilpreet Raju
/
Capitol News IllinoisThe graphic shows how cannabis grown in Illinois gets from cultivation centers to customers.
No notice has been posted, but Johnson’s verbal guidance comes almost two years after the first craft grow business went online in Illinois.It allows roughly 150,000 medical patients, who dispensary owners say are the most consistent purchasers of marijuana, to buy products made by social equity businesses without paying recreational taxes. However — even as more dispensaries open — the number available to medical patients has not increased since 2018, something the Cannabis Regulation Oversight Office “desperately” wants to see changed. Johnson said Illinois is a limited license state, meaning “there are caps on everything” to help control the relatively new market.Berwyn Thompkins, who operates two cannabis businesses, said the rules limited options for patients and small businesses.“It’s about access,” Thompkins said. “Why wouldn’t we want all the patients — which the (adult-use) program was initially built around — why wouldn’t we want them to have access? They should have access to any dispensary.”Customers with a medical marijuana card pay a 1% tax on all marijuana products, whereas recreational customers pay retail taxes between roughly 20 and 40% on a given cannabis product, when accounting for local taxes.While Illinois has received praise for its equity-focused cannabis law, including through an independent study that showed more people of color own cannabis licenses than in any other state, some industry operators say they’ve experienced many unnecessary hurdles getting their businesses up and running.The state, in fact, announced last month that it had opened its 100th social equity dispensary.But Steve Olson, purchasing manager at a pair of dispensaries (including one dual-purpose dispensary) near Rockford, said small specialty license holders have been left in the lurch since the first craft grower opened in October 2022.“You would think that this would be something they’re (the government) trying to help out these social equity companies with, but they’re putting handcuffs on them in so many different spots,” he said. “One of them being this medical thing.”Olson said he contacted state agencies, including the Department of Financial and Professional Regulation, months ago about whether craft products can be sold to medical patients at their retail tax rate, but only heard one response: “They all say it was an oversight.”This potentially hurt social equity companies because they sell wholesale to dispensaries and may have been missing out on a consistent customer base through those medical dispensaries.Olson said the state’s attempts to provide licensees with a path to a successful business over the years, such as with corrective lotteries that granted more social equity licenses, have come up short.“It’s like they almost set up the social equity thing to fail so the big guys could come in and swoop up all these licenses,” Olson said. “I hate to feel like that but, if you look at it, it’s pretty black and white.”Olson said craft companies benefit from any type of retail sale.“If we sell it to medical patients or not, it’s a matter of, ‘Are we collecting the proper taxes?’ That’s all it is,” he said.State revenue from cannabis taxes, licensing costs and other fees goes into the Cannabis Regulation Fund, which is used to fund a host of programs, including cannabis offense expungement, the general revenue fund, and the R3 campaign aiming to uplift disinvested communities.For fiscal year 2024, nearly $256 million was paid out from Cannabis Regulation Fund for related initiatives, which includes almost $89 million transferred to the state’s general revenue fund and more than $20 million distributed to local governments, according to the Illinois Department of Revenue.Medical access still limitedThe state’s 55 medical dispensaries that predate the 2020 legalization law, mostly owned by publicly traded multistate operators that had been operating in Illinois since 2014 under the state’s medical marijuana program, were automatically granted a right to licenses to sell recreationally in January 2020. That gave them a dual-purpose license that no new entrants into the market can receive under current law.Since expanding their clientele in 2020, Illinois dispensaries have sold more than $6 billion worth of cannabis products through recreational transactions alone.Nearly two-thirds of dispensaries licensed to sell to medical patients are in the northeast counties of Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake and Will. Dual-purpose dispensaries only represent about 20 percent of the state’s dispensaries.While the state began offering recreational dispensary licenses since the adult-use legalization law passed, it has not granted a new medical dispensary license since 2018. That has allowed the established players to continue to corner the market on the state’s nearly 150,000 medical marijuana patients.But social equity licensees and advocates say there are more ways to level the playing field, including expanding access to medical sales.Johnson, who became the state’s top cannabis regulator in late 2022, expressed hope for movement during the fall veto session on House Bill 2911, which would expand medical access to all Illinois dispensaries.“We would like every single dispensary in Illinois to be able to serve medical patients,” Johnson said. “It’s something that medical patients have been asking for, for years.”Johnson said the bill would benefit patients and small businesses.“It’s something we desperately want to happen as a state system, because we want to make sure that medical patients are able to easily access what they need,” she said. “We also think it’s good for our social equity dispensaries, as they’re opening, to be able to serve medical patients.”Rep. Bob Morgan, D-Deerfield, who was the first statewide project coordinator for Illinois’ medical cannabis program prior to joining the legislature, wrote in an email to Capitol News Illinois that the state needs to be doing more for its patients.“Illinois is failing the state’s 150,000 medical cannabis patients with debilitating conditions. Too many are still denied the patient protections they deserve, including access to their medicine,” Morgan wrote, adding he would continue to work with stakeholders on further legislation.Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news service covering state government. It is distributed to hundreds of newspapers, radio and TV stations statewide. It is funded primarily by the Illinois Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation, along with major contributions from the Illinois Broadcasters Foundation and Southern Illinois Editorial Association.
[ad_2]
Source link
-
Politics2 years ago
Prenzler ‘reconsidered’ campaign donors, accepts vendor funds
-
Board Bills1 year ago
2024-2025 Board Bill 80 — Prohibiting Street Takeovers
-
Business3 years ago
Fields Foods to open new grocery in Pagedale in March
-
Board Bills3 years ago
2022-2023 Board Bill 168 — City’s Capital Fund
-
Business3 years ago
We Live Here Auténtico! | The Hispanic Chamber | Community and Connection Central
-
Entertainment1 year ago
OK, That New Cardinals/Nelly City Connect Collab Is Kind of Great
-
Entertainment3 years ago
St.Louis Man Sounds Just Like Whitley Hewsten, Plans on Performing At The Shayfitz Arena.
-
Politics1 year ago
Illinois residents can submit designs for the state’s new flag