Connect with us

Politics

Hawley blasts Wagner over radioactive contamination bill

Published

on

[ad_1]


U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley sharply criticized U.S. Rep. Ann Wagner after she questioned the cost of legislation compensating people exposed to radioactive waste — a display of unusual public discord among Missouri’s GOP delegation.For months, Hawley has sought to pass legislation reauthorizing what’s known as the Radioactive Exposure Compensation Act, or RECA, which provides money to people who became sick because of radioactive waste exposure. Hawley’s bill would extend that program into the St. Louis area, which was home to uranium processing during the Manhattan Project era.Hawley’s bill passed the Senate on Thursday by a 69-30 vote. But soon after that legislation was sent to the House, Hawley posted on the social media platform X blasting Wagner for comments she made to The Kansas City Star.While noting that she supported compensating people who became ill because of radioactive waste exposure, Wagner said the bill could face a tough road in the House because of its potential price tag and lack of funding stream to pay for the cost.Congress is not “looking to raise our deficits and debts any further than they already are,” she told the Star, adding “there needs to be a legit pay-for on this.”

Dominick Williams

/

Special to St. Louis Public RadioU.S. Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Missouri, speaks with potential voters at a pancake breakfast on Feb. 17 in Kansas City.

That prompted Hawley to send out several tweets blasting Wagner, including one that stated it’s “shameful for Ann Wagner to turn her back on her constituents – after doing nothing on this issue for years. St. Louis deserves better than this.”He also criticized Wagner for her support for U.S. military assistance to Ukraine, an issue that’s been a major point of difference between the two.He reiterated some of that criticism after meeting with striking Teamsters Saturday outside of Graybar in Hazelwood and also stressed that the House should pass the extension of RECA as soon as possible.“The government poisoned the people of St. Louis and St. Charles. And for 50 years, they’ve been waiting for basic justice,” Hawley said. “I hope every Missouri House member would be a vocal champion of this, but especially somebody who’s from St. Louis. I mean, what’s the holdup?”Without mentioning Hawley by name, Wagner sent out a series of tweets Friday afternoon in which she said she “will do all that I can to see RECA signed into law.”“I have consistently fought on this issue for the last decade and those who stood alongside me know the work I have done to support our St. Louis community,” Wagner said. “I have made it known to House leadership, including the Speaker, that RECA passage is vitally important to the St. Louis region, and to tens of thousands of other families nationwide affected by the nuclear programs.”Later on Friday, after Hawley continued his criticism of her on social media, Wagner said she would try to get the Senate version of RECA into a government funding bill that needs to be passed later in the month.“Asking my MO House colleagues to join me in this effort to House & Senate Leadership & the Appropriations Committees to help victims of our WWII nuclear programs in the STL/St. Chas areas,” Wagner wrote.When asked about Wagner’s push to get RECA into the government funding bill, Hawley replied: “it sounds like we’re moving in the right direction there.”“But there needs to be no excuses. No delays from anybody,” Hawley said. “I’ve talked to the Speaker of the House about this multiple times before. I’m going to talk to every House member who will listen to me. The Senate now has done its part. The House needs to get on it. And I would just hope that folks from here in the St. Louis area would be major champions of this. I can’t imagine why you would not be.”The price tagHawley sought to place RECA in a major national security bill last year known as the National Defense Authorization Act, but it was taken out of the final version. Some lawmakers raised concerns about the potential cost of the legislation.On Saturday, Hawley said that the estimated cost of the bill that passed the Senate last week would be around $50 billion. But he said that money “represents costs that right now the victims are paying.”“If the government breaks it, the government ought to fix it,” Hawley said. “In this case, the government has literally broken these people’s lives in our state and around the country.”Hawley also pushed back against the idea that there should be some sort of funding stream.“My response is that these guys pass bills all the time, like foreign aid, like money to defense contractors, like money for big corporations that are not paid for,” Hawley said. “What they say then is it’s a national priority. Are the people of Missouri not a priority? They are. Are the rest of the folks in America who have been poisoned by the government in numerous other states, are they not a priority?”Hawley has often made the argument that efforts like providing military assistance to Ukraine is a misplaced priority from lawmakers when they haven’t passed legislation compensating people who became sick because of radioactive waste exposure.When asked if it was possible for lawmakers to help Ukraine and help people who contracted diseases consistent with radioactive waste exposure, Hawley said: “Of course.”“I’m a skeptic of additional aid to Ukraine for a lot of different reasons. But even if you think it’s wonderful, fine. Why can we not prioritize the state of Missouri and other good Americans who have served their country, who have given their health for their country, who have given their lives to their country — they deserve to be compensated. This is not a handout. This is justice for people their own government has put into harm’s way.”

Brian Munoz

/

St. Louis Public RadioWagner has played a critical role in Missouri Republican Party politics for several decades.

Unusual public criticismHawley’s criticism of Wagner is highly unusual — especially since the two officials are so influential in Missouri Republican politics.Wagner, a former chairwoman of the Missouri Republican Party and ambassador to Luxembourg, is a powerhouse fundraiser and a mentor to a number of prominent GOP political figures in the St. Louis area.She was touted as a U.S. Senate candidate in 2018, but chose to run for reelection in the 2nd Congressional District instead. That decision came as other Missouri GOP heavyweights, suchas former Sen. John Danforth, were urging then-Attorney General Hawley to run against then-U.S. Sen. Claire McCaskill.Ultimately, Wagner ended up prevailing in reelection bids in 2018 and 2020 that were competitive, primarily because the 2nd District morphed from a fairly GOP-leaning seat at the beginning of the 2010s to a bonafide swing district. After redistricting, the 2nd District will be difficult for Democrats to win — especially since it includes Republican strongholds like Franklin and Warren counties.The winner of the Republican primary in the 2nd District will be favored to win in November. That’s why state Sen. Nick Schroer of St. Charles County’s social media activity criticizing Wagner was notable — as the Defiance Republican lives in the 2nd District and can run for another office this cycle without giving up his state Senate seat.But Hawley said his criticism has nothing to do with any perceived political animosity between himself and Wagner but rather getting RECA passed and getting people in the St. Louis area compensated. He noted he’s been fiercely critical of outgoing Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, but added he’s pleased that he ended up voting for RECA last week.“I want everybody to support this,” Hawley said. “And folks who don’t support it or stand in the way of it — I’m going to come after them. I don’t care what party it is. The people of St. Charles and St. Louis had been told for 50 years: ‘Wait another day. Wait a little longer.’ No more excuses, no more delays.”

[ad_2]

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Poll: Support for Missouri abortion rights amendment growing

Published

on

[ad_1]


A proposed constitutional amendment legalizing abortion in Missouri received support from more than half of respondents in a new poll from St. Louis University and YouGov.That’s a boost from a poll earlier this year, which could mean what’s known as Amendment 3 is in a solid position to pass in November.SLU/YouGov’s poll of 900 likely Missouri voters from Aug. 8-16 found that 52% of respondents would vote for Amendment 3, which would place constitutional protections for abortion up to fetal viability. Thirty-four percent would vote against the measure, while 14% aren’t sure.By comparison, the SLU/YouGov poll from February found that 44% of voters would back the abortion legalization amendment.St. Louis University political science professor Steven Rogers said 32% of Republicans and 53% of independents would vote for the amendment. That’s in addition to nearly 80% of Democratic respondents who would approve the measure. In the previous poll, 24% of Republicans supported the amendment.Rogers noted that neither Amendment 3 nor a separate ballot item raising the state’s minimum wage is helping Democratic candidates. GOP contenders for U.S. Senate, governor, lieutenant governor, treasurer and secretary of state all hold comfortable leads.“We are seeing this kind of crossover voting, a little bit, where there are voters who are basically saying, ‘I am going to the polls and I’m going to support a Republican candidate, but I’m also going to go to the polls and then I’m also going to try to expand abortion access and then raise the minimum wage,’” Rogers said.Republican gubernatorial nominee Mike Kehoe has a 51%-41% lead over Democrat Crystal Quade. And U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley is leading Democrat Lucas Kunce by 53% to 42%. Some GOP candidates for attorney general, secretary of state and treasurer have even larger leads over their Democratic rivals.

Brian Munoz

/

St. Louis Public RadioHundreds of demonstrators pack into a parking lot at Planned Parenthood of St. Louis and Southwest Missouri on June 24, 2022, during a demonstration following the Supreme Court’s reversal of a case that guaranteed the constitutional right to an abortion.

One of the biggest challenges for foes of Amendment 3 could be financial.Typically, Missouri ballot initiatives with well-funded and well-organized campaigns have a better chance of passing — especially if the opposition is underfunded and disorganized. Since the end of July, the campaign committee formed to pass Amendment 3 received more than $3 million in donations of $5,000 or more.That money could be used for television advertisements to improve the proposal’s standing further, Rogers said, as well as point out that Missouri’s current abortion ban doesn’t allow the procedure in the case of rape or incest.“Meanwhile, the anti side won’t have those resources to kind of try to make that counter argument as strongly, and they don’t have public opinion as strongly on their side,” Rogers said.There is precedent of a well-funded initiative almost failing due to opposition from socially conservative voters.In 2006, a measure providing constitutional protections for embryonic stem cell research nearly failed — even though a campaign committee aimed at passing it had a commanding financial advantage.Former state Sen. Bob Onder was part of the opposition campaign to that measure. He said earlier this month it is possible to create a similar dynamic in 2024 against Amendment 3, if social conservatives who oppose abortion rights can band together.“This is not about reproductive rights or care for miscarriages or IVF or anything else,” said Onder, the GOP nominee for Missouri’s 3rd Congressional District seat. “Missourians will learn that out-of-state special interests and dark money from out of state is lying to them and they will reject this amendment.”Quade said earlier this month that Missourians of all political ideologies are ready to roll back the state’s abortion ban.“Regardless of political party, we hear from folks who are tired of politicians being in their doctor’s offices,” Quade said. “They want politicians to mind their own business. So this is going to excite folks all across the political spectrum.”

[ad_2]

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Democrat Mark Osmack makes his case for Missouri treasurer

Published

on

[ad_1]


Mark Osmack has been out of the electoral fray for awhile, but he never completely abandoned his passion for Missouri politics.Osmack, a Valley Park native and U.S. Army veteran, previously ran for Missouri’s 2nd Congressional District seat and for state Senate. Now he’s the Democratic nominee for state treasurer after receiving a phone call from Missouri Democratic Party Chairman Russ Carnahan asking him to run.“There’s a lot of decision making and processing and evaluation that goes into it, which is something I am very passionate and interested in,” Osmack said this week on an episode of Politically Speaking.Osmack is squaring off against state Treasurer Vivek Malek, who was able to easily win a crowded GOP primary against several veteran lawmakers including House Budget Chairman Cody Smith and state Sen. Andrew Koenig.While Malek was able to attract big donations to his political action committee and pour his own money into the campaign, Osmack isn’t worried that he won’t be able to compete in November. Since Malek was appointed to his post, Osmack contends he hasn’t proven that he’s a formidable opponent in a general election.“His actions and his decision making so far in his roughly two year tenure in that office have been questionable,” Osmack said.Among other things, Osmack was critical of Malek for placing unclaimed property notices on video gaming machines which are usually found in gas stations or convenience stores. The legality of the machines has been questioned for some time.As Malek explained on his own episode of Politically Speaking, he wanted to make sure the unclaimed property program was as widely advertised as possible. But he acknowledged it was a mistake to put the decals close to the machines and ultimately decided to remove them.Osmack said: “This doesn’t even pass the common sense sniff test of, ‘Hey, should I put state stickers claiming you might have a billion dollars on a gambling machine that is not registered with the state of Missouri?’ If we’re gonna give kudos for him acknowledging the wrong thing, it never should have been done in the first place.”Osmack’s platform includes supporting programs providing school meals using Missouri agriculture products and making child care more accessible for the working class.He said the fact that Missouri has such a large surplus shows that it’s possible to create programs to make child care within reach for parents.“It is quite audacious for [Republicans] to brag about $8 billion, with a B, dollars in state surplus, while we offer next to no social services to include pre-K, daycare, or child care,” Osmack said.Here’s are some other topics Osmack discussed on the show:How he would handle managing the state’s pension systems and approving low-income housing tax credits. The state treasurer’s office is on boards overseeing both of those programs.Malek’s decision to cut off investments from Chinese companies. Osmack said that Missouri needs to be cautious about abandoning China as a business partner, especially since they’re a major consumer of the state’s agriculture products. “There’s a way to make this work where we are not supporting communist nations to the detriment of the United States or our allies, while also maintaining strong economic ties that benefit Missouri farmers,” he said.What it was like to witness the skirmish at the Missouri State Fair between U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley and Democratic challenger Lucas Kunce.Whether Kunce can get the support of influential groups like the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, which often channels money and staff to states with competitive Senate elections.

[ad_2]

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

As Illinois receives praise for its cannabis equity efforts, stakeholders work on system’s flaws

Published

on

[ad_1]


Medical marijuana patients can now purchase cannabis grown by small businesses as part of their allotment, Illinois’ top cannabis regulator said, but smaller, newly licensed cannabis growers are still seeking greater access to the state’s medical marijuana customers.Illinois legalized medicinal marijuana beginning in 2014, then legalized it for recreational use in 2020. While the 2020 law legalized cannabis use for any adult age 21 or older, it did not expand licensing for medical dispensaries.Patients can purchase marijuana as part of the medical cannabis program at dual-purpose dispensaries, which are licensed to serve both medical and recreational customers. But dual-purpose dispensaries are greatly outnumbered by dispensaries only licensed to sell recreationally, and there are no medical-only dispensaries in the state.As another part of the adult-use legalization law, lawmakers created a “craft grow” license category that was designed to give more opportunities to Illinoisans hoping to legally grow and sell marijuana. The smaller-scale grow operations were part of the 2020 law’s efforts to diversify the cannabis industry in Illinois.Prior to that, all cultivation centers in Illinois were large-scale operations dominated by large multi-state operators. The existing cultivators, mostly in operation since 2014, were allowed to grow recreational cannabis beginning in 2019.Until recently, dual-purpose dispensaries have been unsure as to whether craft-grown products, made by social equity licensees — those who have lived in a disproportionately impacted area or have been historically impacted by the war on drugs — can be sold medicinally as part of a patient’s medical allotment.Erin Johnson, the state’s cannabis regulation oversight officer, told Capitol News Illinois last month that her office has “been telling dispensaries, as they have been asking us” they can now sell craft-grown products to medical patients.“There was just a track and trace issue on our end, but never anything statutorily,” she said.

Dilpreet Raju

/

Capitol News IllinoisThe graphic shows how cannabis grown in Illinois gets from cultivation centers to customers.

No notice has been posted, but Johnson’s verbal guidance comes almost two years after the first craft grow business went online in Illinois.It allows roughly 150,000 medical patients, who dispensary owners say are the most consistent purchasers of marijuana, to buy products made by social equity businesses without paying recreational taxes. However — even as more dispensaries open — the number available to medical patients has not increased since 2018, something the Cannabis Regulation Oversight Office “desperately” wants to see changed. Johnson said Illinois is a limited license state, meaning “there are caps on everything” to help control the relatively new market.Berwyn Thompkins, who operates two cannabis businesses, said the rules limited options for patients and small businesses.“It’s about access,” Thompkins said. “Why wouldn’t we want all the patients — which the (adult-use) program was initially built around — why wouldn’t we want them to have access? They should have access to any dispensary.”Customers with a medical marijuana card pay a 1% tax on all marijuana products, whereas recreational customers pay retail taxes between roughly 20 and 40% on a given cannabis product, when accounting for local taxes.While Illinois has received praise for its equity-focused cannabis law, including through an independent study that showed more people of color own cannabis licenses than in any other state, some industry operators say they’ve experienced many unnecessary hurdles getting their businesses up and running.The state, in fact, announced last month that it had opened its 100th social equity dispensary.But Steve Olson, purchasing manager at a pair of dispensaries (including one dual-purpose dispensary) near Rockford, said small specialty license holders have been left in the lurch since the first craft grower opened in October 2022.“You would think that this would be something they’re (the government) trying to help out these social equity companies with, but they’re putting handcuffs on them in so many different spots,” he said. “One of them being this medical thing.”Olson said he contacted state agencies, including the Department of Financial and Professional Regulation, months ago about whether craft products can be sold to medical patients at their retail tax rate, but only heard one response: “They all say it was an oversight.”This potentially hurt social equity companies because they sell wholesale to dispensaries and may have been missing out on a consistent customer base through those medical dispensaries.Olson said the state’s attempts to provide licensees with a path to a successful business over the years, such as with corrective lotteries that granted more social equity licenses, have come up short.“It’s like they almost set up the social equity thing to fail so the big guys could come in and swoop up all these licenses,” Olson said. “I hate to feel like that but, if you look at it, it’s pretty black and white.”Olson said craft companies benefit from any type of retail sale.“If we sell it to medical patients or not, it’s a matter of, ‘Are we collecting the proper taxes?’ That’s all it is,” he said.State revenue from cannabis taxes, licensing costs and other fees goes into the Cannabis Regulation Fund, which is used to fund a host of programs, including cannabis offense expungement, the general revenue fund, and the R3 campaign aiming to uplift disinvested communities.For fiscal year 2024, nearly $256 million was paid out from Cannabis Regulation Fund for related initiatives, which includes almost $89 million transferred to the state’s general revenue fund and more than $20 million distributed to local governments, according to the Illinois Department of Revenue.Medical access still limitedThe state’s 55 medical dispensaries that predate the 2020 legalization law, mostly owned by publicly traded multistate operators that had been operating in Illinois since 2014 under the state’s medical marijuana program, were automatically granted a right to licenses to sell recreationally in January 2020. That gave them a dual-purpose license that no new entrants into the market can receive under current law.Since expanding their clientele in 2020, Illinois dispensaries have sold more than $6 billion worth of cannabis products through recreational transactions alone.Nearly two-thirds of dispensaries licensed to sell to medical patients are in the northeast counties of Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake and Will. Dual-purpose dispensaries only represent about 20 percent of the state’s dispensaries.While the state began offering recreational dispensary licenses since the adult-use legalization law passed, it has not granted a new medical dispensary license since 2018. That has allowed the established players to continue to corner the market on the state’s nearly 150,000 medical marijuana patients.But social equity licensees and advocates say there are more ways to level the playing field, including expanding access to medical sales.Johnson, who became the state’s top cannabis regulator in late 2022, expressed hope for movement during the fall veto session on House Bill 2911, which would expand medical access to all Illinois dispensaries.“We would like every single dispensary in Illinois to be able to serve medical patients,” Johnson said. “It’s something that medical patients have been asking for, for years.”Johnson said the bill would benefit patients and small businesses.“It’s something we desperately want to happen as a state system, because we want to make sure that medical patients are able to easily access what they need,” she said. “We also think it’s good for our social equity dispensaries, as they’re opening, to be able to serve medical patients.”Rep. Bob Morgan, D-Deerfield, who was the first statewide project coordinator for Illinois’ medical cannabis program prior to joining the legislature, wrote in an email to Capitol News Illinois that the state needs to be doing more for its patients.“Illinois is failing the state’s 150,000 medical cannabis patients with debilitating conditions. Too many are still denied the patient protections they deserve, including access to their medicine,” Morgan wrote, adding he would continue to work with stakeholders on further legislation.Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news service covering state government. It is distributed to hundreds of newspapers, radio and TV stations statewide. It is funded primarily by the Illinois Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation, along with major contributions from the Illinois Broadcasters Foundation and Southern Illinois Editorial Association.

[ad_2]

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending