Politics
Alumni reflect on the year since St. Louis school shooting
[ad_1]
In the year since the school shooting on the Central Visual Performing Arts High School and Collegiate School of Medicine and Bioscience campus, students are finding ways to process their grief, anger and guilt.Beyond the professional care from counselors and school administration, students and alumni have leaned on each other to talk about their traumas. They’ve learned that there are many ways to process and heal.On St. Louis on the Air, CVPA class of 2023 alumna Raniyah Taylor and Collegiate alumni Axel Cortes and Mikayla Sanders shared their experiences of the tragedy on October 24, 2022. They also reflected on the resulting media coverage, conversations amongst their peers, and what they wish people would better understand about how students have felt in the year since.This transcript was edited and condensed for clarity. Listen to the full interview.
Life after a school shooting: CVPA and Collegiate graduates reflect on healing and trauma
Elaine Cha: How was it that you realized that there was something really serious happening [that day]?Raniyah Taylor: My class is on the floor where the first shot took place. It was kind of down the hallway from us. So, we heard it, but we didn’t really pay any mind until the announcements went off. I still didn’t want to believe it was true after hearing all those shots. But then after hearing all that, I heard kids screaming because my class was right under Mrs. Kuczka’s classroom. That’s when it became 100% real to me.Mikayla Sanders: I was a [teachers assistant] for a gym class, so there was a lot going on in the moment. Then the security guard came in the room and started yelling and told us we were going into lockdown. That’s what kind of threw everybody off. For me, I was about making sure that everybody made it into where we were hiding safely and everyone was accounted for.Cha: Was it scarier to be unsure about what was happening or to know for certain what was going on?Axel Cortes: For me, it was scarier to know for certain what was going on because when I was unsure I was hoping that everything was going to be taken care of. Once I realized what was happening I panicked and I didn’t know whether to stay calm or just contact my loved ones from my phone.Taylor: In my case, somebody pulled on my classroom door. So I didn’t know whether [the shooter] was right down the hallway, outside the door or upstairs. I could hear him, but I don’t know exactly where because everything felt so close.Cha: After you finally were able to meet with your families after evacuating campus, what were the conversations that you were having among your friend groups?Sanders: We were seniors and we just started the school year. We haven’t really gotten to do all the stuff that we planned for the school year. This threw everyone through a loop because it’s like, “What do we do now?”Cortes: We had conversations about how school was going to happen in the future. We didn’t know if it was going to go back in person next semester. Other conversations amongst my friends just included them checking up on me and seeing how I was doing about the whole incident.Taylor: There was a senior group chat on Instagram. Everybody in the group chat were in different parts of the building, [and] we were trying to pinpoint what happened. And like Mikayla said, it was senior year, we had a lot planned. So a couple of the seniors from [CVPA] stepped up and made events. Not only were we trying to figure out what happened, but how to move forward. We saw that when we came together everybody was doing just a little bit better. We were trying to make events so that we could be together for Kuczka and Alex.
Brian Munoz
/
St. Louis Public RadioCars pass Central Visual and Performing Arts High School on Tuesday along Kingshighway Boulevard in Southwest Garden. Today marks the 1-year anniversary of a shooting at the building shared by CVPA and the Collegiate School of Medicine and Bioscience.
Cha: After learning the knowable facts about the shooting, how did you feel?Taylor: I was very uneasy. Like, what did we do for that to happen to us? That was the main question. I also feel guilty because the student that died was an underclassman. The boy who shot the school up graduated when I was a freshman or sophomore. So he would have only known the seniors in the building. Why do that to an underclassman? [Alex] was only 15 years old. And Mrs. Kuczka was so sweet to everybody.Cortes: I was also confused as to why people in both schools have to suffer because of one individual’s actions. Why did everyone have to go through fear, have to live with it after the event happened? All because someone decided to make a stupid decision.Cha: What were your conversations with your family?Cortes: First, we went to my grandma’s house. She was the only one who wasn’t working and was at home at the time. She said to me, “¿Estás bien? You’re not hurt or anything?” She worried about me and my cousin who also attended school — and we hadn’t seen him yet. My mom and dad had to go pick up my brother from school because his school was on lockdown because of what happened. My brother was so relieved to see me because there were also gunshots around his area.Sanders: I was looking for my cousin in the Schnucks parking lot. I didn’t know anything about him. Eventually I found him in the parking lot and his mom came to get us before my parents could because they were stuck in traffic trying to get to the school or to where we were. It was a lot of relief when I first found him, just making sure he was ok. When we got out of there I was ready to be somewhere where I felt comfortable and safe.Cha: There was a lot of media coverage on TV, social media and radio during that time and the weeks that followed. Were you following the coverage?Taylor: Personally, I just wanted to turn my phone off. I was tired of everybody texting me. To this day I haven’t responded to some of my family members that had texted me. They saw what my mama said live on Facebook, so they know I’m OK. I kind of followed [the media] to an extent, more so of my friends sending me updates on what happened.Cortes: After a week I stopped keeping up with the news because I was tired of it. At that time I was trying to forget about it. And it wasn’t easy when we returned back to school and there was news companies [outside the campus]. Luckily we didn’t have to interact with them at all about the shooting.
Tristen Rouse
/
St. Louis Public RadioFrom left: Mikayla Sanders, Axel Cortes and Raniyah Taylor talk on Oct. 18 after their St. Louis on the Air roundtable at St. Louis Public Radio. The trio are alumni of Collegiate School of Medicine and Bioscience and Central Visual and Performing Arts High School who survived the shooting that happened there last year.
Cha: Was there anything specifically from mainstream or social media that made you think, “People really don’t get it.”Taylor: I hate that this generation is so desensitized to a lot of stuff. A lot of people were in the comments like, “Oh if I was there I would do this.” If you asked me what I would do [during a school shooting] the day before I would say, “I’mma do this, that and the third.” But in the moment I was sitting down there crying and calling my mom. You don’t know what you’re gonna do until you get in this situation. It really irritated me.Sanders: It was tiring being on social media because a lot of the underclassmen were trying to make it just about Collegiate, but it was like, almost a back and forth with schools. We all went through it. Can we stop trying to make it a competition? Everybody had their own experiences and everything. Every time I open Instagram or some type of social media, it’s a new argument between students.Cortes: I would also see students from Collegiate or from Central trying to belittle one another as to who suffered the most. In my head I’m just like, “Why can’t we both agree that we were all traumatized, scared in that moment, without belittling one another and saying that they don’t care?”Cha: As far as support goes, were there people who really made you feel like they had your back during that time?Taylor: My sister and my best friend. My sister wasn’t there [during the shooting], but I can talk to her about anything. I went to my best friend’s house a lot and we would just vent and say what we were going through. It hit different for us because basketball was right around the corner, and after school we would sit in the gym with Mrs. Kuczka. So it hit a little harder because we were thinking, “Who’s supposed to watch us when we get out of school?”Cortes: Just spending time with my little brother. He and I have a close connection, so anytime I would just hang out with him, I’d forget about it. If I wanted to get out the house and not be asked questions about the event, I would go out with my friends who were also in the shooting, and we would just be there for one another because we shared the same experience.
Brian Munoz
/
St. Louis Public RadioCandles illuminate a carved Snoopy character on Tuesday outside of Central Visual and Performing Arts High School. Today marks the 1-year anniversary of a shooting at the building shared by CVPA and the Collegiate School of Medicine and Bioscience, killing two — teacher Jean Kuszca, who loved Peanuts cartoons, and 15-year-old student Alexzandria Bell.
Cha: Is there something that you would like people to know or understand about what you’ve been through this last year?Sanders: That throughout this time it’s important to just ask somebody if they are OK. Some people might have moved past what happened and already healed in their own way. Some people might still have thoughts about that day. It’s always OK to ask, “Are you OK? Is there anything I can do?”Taylor: Always be nice. You never know how your kindness can affect somebody’s life. Even if you’re having a bad day, don’t put it on everybody else. Because they could be having a bad day, and you’re their last straw. So, just be nice.For more on Raniyah Taylor, Mikayla Sanders, and Axel Cortes’ reflections of the year since the school shooting, listen to St. Louis on the Air on Apple Podcast, Spotify or Google Podcast, or by clicking the play button below.
Life after a school shooting: CVPA and Collegiate graduates reflect on healing and trauma
“St. Louis on the Air” brings you the stories of St. Louis and the people who live, work and create in our region. The show is produced by Miya Norfleet, Emily Woodbury, Danny Wicentowski, Elaine Cha and Alex Heuer. Ulaa Kuziez is our production intern. The audio engineer is Aaron Doerr. Send questions and comments about this story to talk@stlpr.org.
[ad_2]
Source link
Politics
Poll: Support for Missouri abortion rights amendment growing

[ad_1]
A proposed constitutional amendment legalizing abortion in Missouri received support from more than half of respondents in a new poll from St. Louis University and YouGov.That’s a boost from a poll earlier this year, which could mean what’s known as Amendment 3 is in a solid position to pass in November.SLU/YouGov’s poll of 900 likely Missouri voters from Aug. 8-16 found that 52% of respondents would vote for Amendment 3, which would place constitutional protections for abortion up to fetal viability. Thirty-four percent would vote against the measure, while 14% aren’t sure.By comparison, the SLU/YouGov poll from February found that 44% of voters would back the abortion legalization amendment.St. Louis University political science professor Steven Rogers said 32% of Republicans and 53% of independents would vote for the amendment. That’s in addition to nearly 80% of Democratic respondents who would approve the measure. In the previous poll, 24% of Republicans supported the amendment.Rogers noted that neither Amendment 3 nor a separate ballot item raising the state’s minimum wage is helping Democratic candidates. GOP contenders for U.S. Senate, governor, lieutenant governor, treasurer and secretary of state all hold comfortable leads.“We are seeing this kind of crossover voting, a little bit, where there are voters who are basically saying, ‘I am going to the polls and I’m going to support a Republican candidate, but I’m also going to go to the polls and then I’m also going to try to expand abortion access and then raise the minimum wage,’” Rogers said.Republican gubernatorial nominee Mike Kehoe has a 51%-41% lead over Democrat Crystal Quade. And U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley is leading Democrat Lucas Kunce by 53% to 42%. Some GOP candidates for attorney general, secretary of state and treasurer have even larger leads over their Democratic rivals.
Brian Munoz
/
St. Louis Public RadioHundreds of demonstrators pack into a parking lot at Planned Parenthood of St. Louis and Southwest Missouri on June 24, 2022, during a demonstration following the Supreme Court’s reversal of a case that guaranteed the constitutional right to an abortion.
One of the biggest challenges for foes of Amendment 3 could be financial.Typically, Missouri ballot initiatives with well-funded and well-organized campaigns have a better chance of passing — especially if the opposition is underfunded and disorganized. Since the end of July, the campaign committee formed to pass Amendment 3 received more than $3 million in donations of $5,000 or more.That money could be used for television advertisements to improve the proposal’s standing further, Rogers said, as well as point out that Missouri’s current abortion ban doesn’t allow the procedure in the case of rape or incest.“Meanwhile, the anti side won’t have those resources to kind of try to make that counter argument as strongly, and they don’t have public opinion as strongly on their side,” Rogers said.There is precedent of a well-funded initiative almost failing due to opposition from socially conservative voters.In 2006, a measure providing constitutional protections for embryonic stem cell research nearly failed — even though a campaign committee aimed at passing it had a commanding financial advantage.Former state Sen. Bob Onder was part of the opposition campaign to that measure. He said earlier this month it is possible to create a similar dynamic in 2024 against Amendment 3, if social conservatives who oppose abortion rights can band together.“This is not about reproductive rights or care for miscarriages or IVF or anything else,” said Onder, the GOP nominee for Missouri’s 3rd Congressional District seat. “Missourians will learn that out-of-state special interests and dark money from out of state is lying to them and they will reject this amendment.”Quade said earlier this month that Missourians of all political ideologies are ready to roll back the state’s abortion ban.“Regardless of political party, we hear from folks who are tired of politicians being in their doctor’s offices,” Quade said. “They want politicians to mind their own business. So this is going to excite folks all across the political spectrum.”
[ad_2]
Source link
Politics
Democrat Mark Osmack makes his case for Missouri treasurer

[ad_1]
Mark Osmack has been out of the electoral fray for awhile, but he never completely abandoned his passion for Missouri politics.Osmack, a Valley Park native and U.S. Army veteran, previously ran for Missouri’s 2nd Congressional District seat and for state Senate. Now he’s the Democratic nominee for state treasurer after receiving a phone call from Missouri Democratic Party Chairman Russ Carnahan asking him to run.“There’s a lot of decision making and processing and evaluation that goes into it, which is something I am very passionate and interested in,” Osmack said this week on an episode of Politically Speaking.Osmack is squaring off against state Treasurer Vivek Malek, who was able to easily win a crowded GOP primary against several veteran lawmakers including House Budget Chairman Cody Smith and state Sen. Andrew Koenig.While Malek was able to attract big donations to his political action committee and pour his own money into the campaign, Osmack isn’t worried that he won’t be able to compete in November. Since Malek was appointed to his post, Osmack contends he hasn’t proven that he’s a formidable opponent in a general election.“His actions and his decision making so far in his roughly two year tenure in that office have been questionable,” Osmack said.Among other things, Osmack was critical of Malek for placing unclaimed property notices on video gaming machines which are usually found in gas stations or convenience stores. The legality of the machines has been questioned for some time.As Malek explained on his own episode of Politically Speaking, he wanted to make sure the unclaimed property program was as widely advertised as possible. But he acknowledged it was a mistake to put the decals close to the machines and ultimately decided to remove them.Osmack said: “This doesn’t even pass the common sense sniff test of, ‘Hey, should I put state stickers claiming you might have a billion dollars on a gambling machine that is not registered with the state of Missouri?’ If we’re gonna give kudos for him acknowledging the wrong thing, it never should have been done in the first place.”Osmack’s platform includes supporting programs providing school meals using Missouri agriculture products and making child care more accessible for the working class.He said the fact that Missouri has such a large surplus shows that it’s possible to create programs to make child care within reach for parents.“It is quite audacious for [Republicans] to brag about $8 billion, with a B, dollars in state surplus, while we offer next to no social services to include pre-K, daycare, or child care,” Osmack said.Here’s are some other topics Osmack discussed on the show:How he would handle managing the state’s pension systems and approving low-income housing tax credits. The state treasurer’s office is on boards overseeing both of those programs.Malek’s decision to cut off investments from Chinese companies. Osmack said that Missouri needs to be cautious about abandoning China as a business partner, especially since they’re a major consumer of the state’s agriculture products. “There’s a way to make this work where we are not supporting communist nations to the detriment of the United States or our allies, while also maintaining strong economic ties that benefit Missouri farmers,” he said.What it was like to witness the skirmish at the Missouri State Fair between U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley and Democratic challenger Lucas Kunce.Whether Kunce can get the support of influential groups like the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, which often channels money and staff to states with competitive Senate elections.
[ad_2]
Source link
Politics
As Illinois receives praise for its cannabis equity efforts, stakeholders work on system’s flaws

[ad_1]
Medical marijuana patients can now purchase cannabis grown by small businesses as part of their allotment, Illinois’ top cannabis regulator said, but smaller, newly licensed cannabis growers are still seeking greater access to the state’s medical marijuana customers.Illinois legalized medicinal marijuana beginning in 2014, then legalized it for recreational use in 2020. While the 2020 law legalized cannabis use for any adult age 21 or older, it did not expand licensing for medical dispensaries.Patients can purchase marijuana as part of the medical cannabis program at dual-purpose dispensaries, which are licensed to serve both medical and recreational customers. But dual-purpose dispensaries are greatly outnumbered by dispensaries only licensed to sell recreationally, and there are no medical-only dispensaries in the state.As another part of the adult-use legalization law, lawmakers created a “craft grow” license category that was designed to give more opportunities to Illinoisans hoping to legally grow and sell marijuana. The smaller-scale grow operations were part of the 2020 law’s efforts to diversify the cannabis industry in Illinois.Prior to that, all cultivation centers in Illinois were large-scale operations dominated by large multi-state operators. The existing cultivators, mostly in operation since 2014, were allowed to grow recreational cannabis beginning in 2019.Until recently, dual-purpose dispensaries have been unsure as to whether craft-grown products, made by social equity licensees — those who have lived in a disproportionately impacted area or have been historically impacted by the war on drugs — can be sold medicinally as part of a patient’s medical allotment.Erin Johnson, the state’s cannabis regulation oversight officer, told Capitol News Illinois last month that her office has “been telling dispensaries, as they have been asking us” they can now sell craft-grown products to medical patients.“There was just a track and trace issue on our end, but never anything statutorily,” she said.
Dilpreet Raju
/
Capitol News IllinoisThe graphic shows how cannabis grown in Illinois gets from cultivation centers to customers.
No notice has been posted, but Johnson’s verbal guidance comes almost two years after the first craft grow business went online in Illinois.It allows roughly 150,000 medical patients, who dispensary owners say are the most consistent purchasers of marijuana, to buy products made by social equity businesses without paying recreational taxes. However — even as more dispensaries open — the number available to medical patients has not increased since 2018, something the Cannabis Regulation Oversight Office “desperately” wants to see changed. Johnson said Illinois is a limited license state, meaning “there are caps on everything” to help control the relatively new market.Berwyn Thompkins, who operates two cannabis businesses, said the rules limited options for patients and small businesses.“It’s about access,” Thompkins said. “Why wouldn’t we want all the patients — which the (adult-use) program was initially built around — why wouldn’t we want them to have access? They should have access to any dispensary.”Customers with a medical marijuana card pay a 1% tax on all marijuana products, whereas recreational customers pay retail taxes between roughly 20 and 40% on a given cannabis product, when accounting for local taxes.While Illinois has received praise for its equity-focused cannabis law, including through an independent study that showed more people of color own cannabis licenses than in any other state, some industry operators say they’ve experienced many unnecessary hurdles getting their businesses up and running.The state, in fact, announced last month that it had opened its 100th social equity dispensary.But Steve Olson, purchasing manager at a pair of dispensaries (including one dual-purpose dispensary) near Rockford, said small specialty license holders have been left in the lurch since the first craft grower opened in October 2022.“You would think that this would be something they’re (the government) trying to help out these social equity companies with, but they’re putting handcuffs on them in so many different spots,” he said. “One of them being this medical thing.”Olson said he contacted state agencies, including the Department of Financial and Professional Regulation, months ago about whether craft products can be sold to medical patients at their retail tax rate, but only heard one response: “They all say it was an oversight.”This potentially hurt social equity companies because they sell wholesale to dispensaries and may have been missing out on a consistent customer base through those medical dispensaries.Olson said the state’s attempts to provide licensees with a path to a successful business over the years, such as with corrective lotteries that granted more social equity licenses, have come up short.“It’s like they almost set up the social equity thing to fail so the big guys could come in and swoop up all these licenses,” Olson said. “I hate to feel like that but, if you look at it, it’s pretty black and white.”Olson said craft companies benefit from any type of retail sale.“If we sell it to medical patients or not, it’s a matter of, ‘Are we collecting the proper taxes?’ That’s all it is,” he said.State revenue from cannabis taxes, licensing costs and other fees goes into the Cannabis Regulation Fund, which is used to fund a host of programs, including cannabis offense expungement, the general revenue fund, and the R3 campaign aiming to uplift disinvested communities.For fiscal year 2024, nearly $256 million was paid out from Cannabis Regulation Fund for related initiatives, which includes almost $89 million transferred to the state’s general revenue fund and more than $20 million distributed to local governments, according to the Illinois Department of Revenue.Medical access still limitedThe state’s 55 medical dispensaries that predate the 2020 legalization law, mostly owned by publicly traded multistate operators that had been operating in Illinois since 2014 under the state’s medical marijuana program, were automatically granted a right to licenses to sell recreationally in January 2020. That gave them a dual-purpose license that no new entrants into the market can receive under current law.Since expanding their clientele in 2020, Illinois dispensaries have sold more than $6 billion worth of cannabis products through recreational transactions alone.Nearly two-thirds of dispensaries licensed to sell to medical patients are in the northeast counties of Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake and Will. Dual-purpose dispensaries only represent about 20 percent of the state’s dispensaries.While the state began offering recreational dispensary licenses since the adult-use legalization law passed, it has not granted a new medical dispensary license since 2018. That has allowed the established players to continue to corner the market on the state’s nearly 150,000 medical marijuana patients.But social equity licensees and advocates say there are more ways to level the playing field, including expanding access to medical sales.Johnson, who became the state’s top cannabis regulator in late 2022, expressed hope for movement during the fall veto session on House Bill 2911, which would expand medical access to all Illinois dispensaries.“We would like every single dispensary in Illinois to be able to serve medical patients,” Johnson said. “It’s something that medical patients have been asking for, for years.”Johnson said the bill would benefit patients and small businesses.“It’s something we desperately want to happen as a state system, because we want to make sure that medical patients are able to easily access what they need,” she said. “We also think it’s good for our social equity dispensaries, as they’re opening, to be able to serve medical patients.”Rep. Bob Morgan, D-Deerfield, who was the first statewide project coordinator for Illinois’ medical cannabis program prior to joining the legislature, wrote in an email to Capitol News Illinois that the state needs to be doing more for its patients.“Illinois is failing the state’s 150,000 medical cannabis patients with debilitating conditions. Too many are still denied the patient protections they deserve, including access to their medicine,” Morgan wrote, adding he would continue to work with stakeholders on further legislation.Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news service covering state government. It is distributed to hundreds of newspapers, radio and TV stations statewide. It is funded primarily by the Illinois Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation, along with major contributions from the Illinois Broadcasters Foundation and Southern Illinois Editorial Association.
[ad_2]
Source link
-
Politics2 years ago
Prenzler ‘reconsidered’ campaign donors, accepts vendor funds
-
Board Bills1 year ago
2024-2025 Board Bill 80 — Prohibiting Street Takeovers
-
Business3 years ago
Fields Foods to open new grocery in Pagedale in March
-
Board Bills3 years ago
2022-2023 Board Bill 168 — City’s Capital Fund
-
Business3 years ago
We Live Here Auténtico! | The Hispanic Chamber | Community and Connection Central
-
Entertainment1 year ago
OK, That New Cardinals/Nelly City Connect Collab Is Kind of Great
-
Entertainment3 years ago
St.Louis Man Sounds Just Like Whitley Hewsten, Plans on Performing At The Shayfitz Arena.
-
Politics1 year ago
Illinois residents can submit designs for the state’s new flag